[SOGo] BTS activities for Sunday, October 30 2011

2011-10-30 Thread SOGo reporter
Title: BTS activities for Sunday, October 30 2011 BTS Activities Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs Project: SOGo For the period covering: Sunday, October 30 2011 idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary

[SOGo] PostgreSQL gotchas

2011-10-30 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi, For other people trying to install SOGo using PostgreSQL authentication on CentOS6 here are a few gotchas I encountered: 1) By default PostgreSQL is not accepting TCP/IP connections. You can enable this by adding PGOPTS="-i" to /etc/sysconfig/pgsql/postgresql and restarting the postgresql

[SOGo] warning in the sogo log files

2011-10-30 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi, I've now got my first SOGo installation finally working with PostgreSQL and remote Dovecot IMAP server. When I login using the web UI I see the following warnings in /var/log/sogo/sogo.log : Oct 30 21:41:57 sogod [29911]: [WARN] <0x0x8a76f0c[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]> entry '{DAV:}write' already

Re: [SOGo] Re: sogo-1.3.9-2 update problems

2011-10-30 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi, On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > On 30/10/11 10:10, Peter Peltonen wrote: >> >> So... Is this a bug in the updated package or have I somehow managed >> to misconfigure my server? >> >> This is my first installation and the packages were updated by yum in >> the middl

Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Jeroen Beerstra
Same here, thank you for the quick solution! My sope packages were less outdated but still outdated. I think the problem yum wise was this: new version is 1.3.9-2, old version had a higher number so yum considered it newer. -- met vriendelijke groet, Jeroen Beerstra j.beers...@upcmail.nl --

Re: [SOGo] Re: sogo-1.3.9-2 update problems

2011-10-30 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 30/10/11 10:10, Peter Peltonen wrote: So... Is this a bug in the updated package or have I somehow managed to misconfigure my server? This is my first installation and the packages were updated by yum in the middle of the installation process. Maybe I should remove the packages and start all

[SOGo] Re: sogo-1.3.9-2 update problems

2011-10-30 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi, On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote: > Hi, > > Just ran 'yum update' on my centos6 box and SOGo was updated to version > 1.3.9-2. > > When accessing my server with the address /SOGo/ I get now no graphics > displayed in the login page. > > In the sogo.log file I see the er

Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Martin (Lists)
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2011 schrieb Ludovic Marcotte: > On 30/10/11 07:03, Martin (Lists) wrote: > > And if I change the table names ('b' for the _quick table and 'a' > > for the normal one) it went through smoothly. > > > > Besides this sogod tries to load libgnustep-base.so.1.23 and > > libgnus

Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 30/10/11 07:03, Martin (Lists) wrote: And if I change the table names ('b' for the _quick table and 'a' for the normal one) it went through smoothly. Besides this sogod tries to load libgnustep-base.so.1.23 and libgnustep-base.so.1.20. The command 'ldd /usr/sbin/sogod | grep base' reports: l

Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread jb
Same problem on SL6.1: sogo seems to attempt fetching fields from the quick tables that are really in the full tables: Oct 30 12:46:27 sogod [5457]: [ERROR] <0x0x2d063b8[GCSFolder]> -[GCSFolder fetchFields:fetchSpecification:ignoreDeleted:]: cannot execute quick-fetch SQL 'SELECT b.c_name,a.c_dele

Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Martin (Lists)
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2011 schrieb Christian Naumer: > Am 30.10.2011 09:53, schrieb Christian Naumer: > > There are some others as well for > > a.c_deleted > > b.c_component > > > > but there are only c_component fields in the table and no fields > > with deleted in there. But this is the same i

Re: [SOGo] SOGo 1.3.9 Update results

2011-10-30 Thread Dominique
Hi, SOGo and SOPE upgrade jointly under Ubuntu package release. Should I and Is there a way to reupgrade SOPE only ? Dominique On 30/10/2011 00:25, Tobias Wallura wrote: 3. The preferences windows does not close properly, and gives an error regarding a proxy "Proxy Error The proxy server rec

Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Christian Naumer
Am 30.10.2011 09:53, schrieb Christian Naumer: > > > There are some others as well for > a.c_deleted > b.c_component > > but there are only c_component fields in the table and no fields with > deleted in there. But this is the same in the working system on Centos6 I have to correct this the c

Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Christian Naumer
Am 30.10.2011 08:29, schrieb Christian Naumer: > > > After the Upgrade to 1.3.9 I get the following Error in sogolog: > > Oct 30 08:22:44 sogod [11571]: [ERROR] <0x0xa38050c[GCSFolder]> > -[GCSFolder fetchFields:fetchSpecification:ignoreDeleted:]: cannot > execute quick-fetch SQL 'SELECT b.c_na

[SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Christian Naumer
After the Upgrade to 1.3.9 I get the following Error in sogolog: Oct 30 08:22:44 sogod [11571]: [ERROR] <0x0xa38050c[GCSFolder]> -[GCSFolder fetchFields:fetchSpecification:ignoreDeleted:]: cannot execute quick-fetch SQL 'SELECT b.c_name,a.c_deleted FROM sogocn00122006b17_quick a, sogocn00122006b1