[SOGo] BTS activities for Thursday, September 19 2013

2013-09-19 Thread SOGo reporter
Title: BTS activities for Thursday, September 19 2013 BTS Activities Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs Project: SOGo For the period covering: Thursday, September 19 2013 idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Rémi Letot
Jeroen Dekkers writes: > At Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:10:24 +0200, > Rémi Letot wrote: >> >> Ludovic Marcotte >> writes: >> >> > 1. create an Active Sync bundle in SOGo for synchronization >> > 2. license it under a free but non-GPL (BSD, for example) >> > 3. distribute it for free >> > >> > We can'

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Jean Raby
On 13-09-19 12:45 PM, MJ Ray wrote: Could something semi-detached Funambol-like be done instead of moving SOGo away from the GPL? We're not moving SOGo away from the GPL. the active sync stuff will have to be licensed under another license, but that's it. -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/so

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
At Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:10:24 +0200, Rémi Letot wrote: > > Ludovic Marcotte > writes: > > > 1. create an Active Sync bundle in SOGo for synchronization > > 2. license it under a free but non-GPL (BSD, for example) > > 3. distribute it for free > > > > We can't use the GPL because of patents > > r

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread MJ Ray
On 09/19/13 09:10, Rémi Letot wrote: > Ludovic Marcotte writes: >> 1. create an Active Sync bundle in SOGo for synchronization >> 2. license it under a free but non-GPL (BSD, for example) >> 3. distribute it for free >> >> We can't use the GPL because of patents >> restrictions. Z-Push/OPush/Synch

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Steven Swarts
On 19/09/2013 9:09 PM, Davor Vusir wrote: Bravo! -- Skickat från mobilusken! -- 18 sep 2013 kl. 23:23 skrev "Ludovic Marcotte" >: Hello, We've been pretty silent when it came to Active Sync support in SOGo for multiple reasons. First of all, there are licen

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Davor Vusir
Bravo! -- Skickat från mobilusken! -- > 18 sep 2013 kl. 23:23 skrev "Ludovic Marcotte" : > > Hello, > > We've been pretty silent when it came to Active Sync support in SOGo for > multiple reasons. > > First of all, there are licensing implications with Microsoft Active Sync. > Moreover, ther

Re: [SOGo] not receiving mails

2013-09-19 Thread labolinux
Le 19/09/2013 08:37, Relu Parfene a écrit : On 18.09.2013 17:41, labolinux wrote:Hi, It seems you have an issue with lmtp daemon. Try these steps: 1. Check if lmtp daemon is running: telnet 0 24 If it is working, you have to have a prompt similar to this one (i use dovecot): Trying 0.0.0.0...

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 2013-09-19 6:49 AM, Martin Rabl wrote: Ok, for my understanding: that fees are to pay, when SOGo + AS is used in a ISP setup? What about the company setup? Microsoft charges a per-mailbox fee for Active Sync support. We'll produce the software and distribute it for free, it'll be your respo

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Martin Rabl
Hi, Am 19.09.13 12:47, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte: On 2013-09-19 3:03 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: Do you have any ballpark estimates for what that fee would be? I'm worried that such a per-mailbox fee might not scale very well to ISP scale number of mailboxes. At a minimum it must be based on

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 2013-09-19 3:03 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: Do you have any ballpark estimates for what that fee would be? I'm worried that such a per-mailbox fee might not scale very well to ISP scale number of mailboxes. At a minimum it must be based on actual ActiveSync usage, not total number of accoun

Re: [SOGo] not receiving mails

2013-09-19 Thread Martin (Lists)
Am 18.09.2013 16:41, schrieb labolinux: > Le 18/09/2013 14:36, Szládovics Péter a écrit : >> 2013-09-18 13:24 keltezéssel, labolinux írta: >>> Bonjour, >>> We configured SOGowith all its dependencies (ldap, postfix, >>> cyrus-imap, postgresql) >>> on centos 6.4.Everything is working well, unless th

RE : Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread alain.abbas
Hello The activesync licence is not appliable in Europe because the Europe doens t reconize brevets on software or protocols. European peoples can use activesync protocol without pay microsoft.  Envoyé depuis mon Samsung Galaxy S 4 d’Orange Message d'origine De : Jan-Frode My

[SOGo] Problem connecting native Outlook mode

2013-09-19 Thread mlists
Hello everyone, first of all thanks for the great product, we have been using SOGo here for some time now with no problems at all. Now we would like to introduce the native Outlook support to our users, but we ran into some problems. Samba keeps on failing with an uncaught exception: mapipro

Re: [SOGo] not receiving mails

2013-09-19 Thread Relu Parfene
On 18.09.2013 17:41, labolinux wrote: Le 18/09/2013 14:36, Szládovics Péter a écrit : 2013-09-18 13:24 keltezéssel, labolinux írta: Bonjour, We configured SOGowith all its dependencies (ldap, postfix, cyrus-imap, postgresql) on centos 6.4.Everything is working well, unless the fact that users

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Rémi Letot
Ludovic Marcotte writes: > 1. create an Active Sync bundle in SOGo for synchronization > 2. license it under a free but non-GPL (BSD, for example) > 3. distribute it for free > > We can't use the GPL because of patents > restrictions. Z-Push/OPush/Synchotron are all using patented > technologies

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:03:26AM +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > > it. That fee, would have to be paid to Microsoft directly. > > Do you have any ballpark estimates for what that fee would be? I'm > worried that such a per-mailbox fee might not scale very well to > ISP scale number of mailbo

Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo

2013-09-19 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:22:50PM -0400, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > > Since the addition of Active Sync support in SOGo would be a > server-side implementation, there would be a per-mailbox fee to use > it. That fee, would have to be paid to Microsoft directly. Do you have any ballpark estimates