[SOGo] Authentication of Funambol 8.7 and SOGo

2010-11-02 Thread Peter Simpson
h log files to look at and where would be very much appreciated. (PS. Even if I clear my browser cache, it does not sometimes result in entries in Funambol's logs.) Many thanks for any help that may be available. Regards, Peter Simpson -- This message is intended only for the address

Re: [SOGo] Authentication of Funambol 8.7 and SOGo

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Simpson
Thanks for the rapid reply. On Tuesday 02 Nov 2010 17:31:15 Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > On 10-11-02 1:06 PM, Peter Simpson wrote: > > In order to test Funambol, I am merely trying to connect to the sample > > web demo provided with Funambol. > > That won't show you any

Re: [SOGo] Authentication of Funambol 8.7 and SOGo

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Simpson
I should add that I have just found this conversation: http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/sogo/2008-September/001275.html Which suggests that the problem is in versions of Apache Commons being used. Would you know which versions are expected ? Or is this a Funambol problem ? (I hope the fo

Re: [SOGo] Authentication of Funambol 8.7 and SOGo

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Simpson
regards, Peter On Tuesday 02 Nov 2010 17:31:15 Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > On 10-11-02 1:06 PM, Peter Simpson wrote: > > In order to test Funambol, I am merely trying to connect to the sample > > web demo provided with Funambol. > > That won't show you any SOGo related data. &g

Re: [SOGo] Authentication of Funambol 8.7 and SOGo

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Simpson
est server? my script worked 100 % :-) in the > evening I can try to install this on x64 but I use x32. > > > > -- orginal Nachricht ------ > From: "Peter Simpson" > To: users@sogo.nu > Sent: 03.11.2010 16:54:53 > Subject: Re: [SOGo] Authentication of Funambo

Re: [SOGo] Authentication of Funambol 8.7 and SOGo

2010-11-19 Thread Peter Simpson
one's time. Peter On Wednesday 03 Nov 2010 15:54:53 Peter Simpson wrote: > Hi, again. > > A fellow subscriber has sent me the script that he uses to set up a > Funambol box and that fails in exactly the same way too! > > I have now tried Funambol 8.5.2 and 8.7 > >