If this has any relation to http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2489 please add
a note on how it was resolved.
Thanks!
On 6 Mar 2014, at 2:35 am, Ron Scott-Adams wrote:
> Ah, I had 8443 missing from the SSL conditional block (it was only in the TLS
> block). Oops. It’s working now… that’s two
Hi Guys,
Not getting much back from the bug report
(http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2489) so just throwing it out here.
Has anybody come across this?
Summary 0002489: Apple iCal - OS X 10.9 - Delegated Calendars Show Error
Description Hi,
Upon upgrading OS X to 10.9 and first opening i
For anyone who is using an external reverse proxy it will break, by default it
now listens on only 127.0.0.1
To fix use: defaults write sogod WOPort 2
On 08/11/2013, at 2:16 PM, Francis Lachapelle wrote:
> The Inverse Team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of SOGo
> 2.1.0.
This would be a good place to start looking.
http://www.sogo.nu/files/docs/SOGo%20Installation%20Guide.pdf
http://wiki.sogo.nu
On 30/10/2013, at 12:52 AM, wrote:
> i am totally new for SOGo and i need help how to configure sogo with existing
> active directory 2012 on CentOS server.
>
> Thank
Hi,
Are there any plans to support iCal in OS X Mavericks?
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Nice, should it resolve the delegation issue as well as the unknown webclient?
On 25/10/2013, at 12:00 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
> On 2013-10-24 8:38 PM, sicr...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
>> I assume 10.9 isn't supported yet as sogo logs show:
> I've just pushed a fix in SOPE - try the upcoming ni