On 21/05/12 10:39, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote:
Why the two different methods of finding posix[gG]roup? Would it be
more advantageous to search for objectClasses using the same methods?
Yes - please file a bug report with your findings.
Thanks,
--
Ludovic Marcotte
+1.514.755.3630 :: www.invers
On 5/21/2012 9:59 AM, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote:
On 5/18/2012 4:06 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 18/05/12 08:41, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote:
objectClass: posixgroup
It could be a string case issue. Try "posixGroup".
No dice, group still not expanded. Only change made was posixgroup to
posixGro
On 5/18/2012 4:06 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 18/05/12 08:41, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote:
objectClass: posixgroup
It could be a string case issue. Try "posixGroup".
No dice, group still not expanded. Only change made was posixgroup to
posixGroup, everything else remained the same. wireshark
On 18/05/12 08:41, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote:
objectClass: posixgroup
It could be a string case issue. Try "posixGroup".
--
Ludovic Marcotte
+1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inve
Hello all!
Looking to re-configure SOGo to use Groups but seem to be overlooking
something which is preventing groups from properly working. Our LDAP
group appears to have the right attributes set as well as the SOGo
config, but when we add a group to an event it is not expanded out to
its me
