On Thursday 11 of October 2012 22:00:31 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
> > Wonderful, thank you.
> >
> > Anyway, I just regret that to the patches mentioned at the beginning,
> > from the SOGo team was no reaction at all - neither positive nor
> > negative, no requirements to change patches, just nothing
Wonderful, thank you.
Anyway, I just regret that to the patches mentioned at the beginning, from the
SOGo team was no reaction at all - neither positive nor negative, no
requirements to change patches, just nothing.
Those bloody SOGo spoon benders. Don't ever trust them!
Seriously though, e
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 21:50:34 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
> Ah ok, I understand now.
>
>
> I have applied a fix in OpenChange, where the issue really lies. Please
> use the next nightly builds. Of course this will also be included in the
> next release.
>
>
> Wolfgang
Wonderful, thank you.
Ah ok, I understand now.
I have applied a fix in OpenChange, where the issue really lies. Please
use the next nightly builds. Of course this will also be included in the
next release.
Wolfgang
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 21:34:01 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
> > Thank you for your response.
> >
> > For rebuild debian package I have apt sources for both sogo-stable, and
> > also sogo-nightly. I've looked also to Openchange SVN, but there has not
> > been carried out related fix - adding in
Thank you for your response.
For rebuild debian package I have apt sources for both sogo-stable, and also
sogo-nightly. I've looked also to Openchange SVN, but there has not been
carried out related fix - adding include gen_ndr/server_id.h into
libmapiproxy.h. Therefore, I have patch that adds
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 20:36:07 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
> On 2012-10-11 13:12, Slávek Banko wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > When I again added patches for imaps and sieve with mailhost from ldap
> > (see bugs 1061 and 1866) and rebuild 2.0.1, I was surprised that there
> > are still same proble
On 2012-10-11 13:12, Slávek Banko wrote:
Hi all,
When I again added patches for imaps and sieve with mailhost from ldap (see
bugs 1061 and 1866) and rebuild 2.0.1, I was surprised that there are still
same problems with rebuild, as were in 2.0.0.
Hi Slávek,
Jean Raby is on vacation right n
Hi all,
When I again added patches for imaps and sieve with mailhost from ldap (see
bugs 1061 and 1866) and rebuild 2.0.1, I was surprised that there are still
same problems with rebuild, as were in 2.0.0.
Please, what more can I do to fix? The proposed patch I sent last time, but
unfortunatel
