Using the -l (log) option

2004-09-06 Thread Chris
I'm sure this question will have an easy answer, but after reading man spamassassin, the conf man, spamd man, I can't find the answer. I'm calling spamassassin with spamd, I'm curious as to what would be written to a log file using the -l option in spamassassin, however, I haven't the

using a global bayesian database?

2004-09-06 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
hi I've started to train SA with some old mail (running slowly), and, running this as root, SA generates the database under /root/.spamassassin/ Can I have spamassassin update a common database for all users on the whole system somehow? thanks roy

Re: Using the -l (log) option

2004-09-06 Thread Bob McClure Jr
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 09:00:58PM -0500, Chris wrote: I'm sure this question will have an easy answer, but after reading man spamassassin, the conf man, spamd man, I can't find the answer. I'm calling spamassassin with spamd, Umm, you mean calling spamd with spamc. spamassassin is the

Re: using a global bayesian database?

2004-09-06 Thread Lucas Albers
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk said: Can I have spamassassin update a common database for all users on the whole system somehow? This depends on how SA is integrated with your mail server. if all incoming mail is run under the same account, then you have a a global database, if it runs under each user,

Re: Ping for primary MX

2004-09-06 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Perhaps something like: - a higher priority MX is up - the mail was delivered from a secondary MX with little or no delay Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My concern was primarily for the secondary, where you don't know the delay until you forward. Are you saying that the first

Re: 1-Megabyte Spam

2004-09-06 Thread Nix
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, David B. Funk stated: If you -know- that the non-binary part is small/moderate, throw it at SA anyway. SA is programmed to skip over binary parts and not even try to scan their contents, so no loss of speed. Rawbody rules still apply to them, don't they? That was my point.

Re: using a global bayesian database?

2004-09-06 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 09:54:43AM -0600, Lucas Albers whispered: This depends on how SA is integrated with your mail server. if all incoming mail is run under the same account, then you have a a global database, if it runs under each user, with procmail for example then you do not. Actually,

Re: Bayes Perms

2004-09-06 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:24:28AM -0400, JP whispered: /etc/mail/spamassassin ls -l total 1252 -rw---1 vscanvscan 27827 2004-09-06 00:11 bayes_journal -rw-rw-r--1 vscanusers 86016 2004-09-06 00:10 bayes_seen -rw-rw-r--1 vscanusers 1314816