Thanks for the info -
BTW the cloudmark servers seem to all be back online now...
e
Bill Landry said:
> - Original Message -
> From: "kaiser suse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> BTW I have head of folly and joy, but where does one find the definitive
>> list of cloudmark servers?
>
> Don't kno
- Original Message -
From: "kaiser suse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BTW I have head of folly and joy, but where does one find the definitive
> list of cloudmark servers?
Don't know if there is a master list somewhere, but here are the razor
servers that I know of:
folly.cloudmark.com
joy.clo
Yikes - that's a lot of razor configs to edit, I have 1000 users invoking
spamc from procmail... time to whip up a little perl script I guess.
BTW I have head of folly and joy, but where does one find the definitive
list of cloudmark servers?
e
Bill Landry said:
> - Original Message -
>
- Original Message -
From: "Keyser SuSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Since midmorning PST today (Sept 8), all razor servers have been
> rejecting connections - did I miss an announcement somehow? Did anybody
> else see this coming?
I had to switch from the "thrill" and "pride" servers this mo
Since midmorning PST today (Sept 8), all razor servers have been
rejecting connections - did I miss an announcement somehow? Did anybody
else see this coming?
e
Sep 08 15:40:31.233958 check[7543]: [ 2] [bootup] Logging initiated
LogDebugLevel=3 to file:/home/jjs/.razor/razor-agent.log
Sep 08 1
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:04:00 -0500
Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To migrate AWL data you can use the convert_awl_dbm_to_sql script in
> the tools directory.
Looks like I have it working though I think I'm going to give up on
importing my bayes db into MySQL and re-train it because it
It would be nice if we had full complete directions on upgrading to sql
based for SA 3.0.
Step by step.
--
Luke Computer Science System Administrator
Security Administrator,College of Engineering
Montana State University-Bozeman,Montana
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:16:06 -0500
Josh Trutwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Meta: In the future, please limit your line length, it makes it
> > easier
> > to reply.
>
> Really? I have it set to wrap at 70 chars. Should it be less?
> (Sylpheed Claws client). Let me try this: "Wrap befo
Its Vegas baby! What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas! ;)
Was the air horn for the hotel?
--Chris (My wife won't let me within 50 miles of Vegas!)
>-Original Message-
>From: Gary Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 5:17 PM
>To: Gary Smith; Chris Santerre
Correction, Rooms... My wife might get a little confused if she reads that
one! :)
Gary
From: Gary Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 9/8/2004 2:16 PM
To: Chris Santerre; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: ANNOUNCE: ApacheCon US 2004 (SpamAssass
Josh Trutwin wrote:
But the man page says:
--restore=filename
Performs a restore of the Bayes database defined by filename.
WARNING: This is a destructive operation, previous Bayes data will be wiped out.
That doesn't sound promising!
Remember that your *SQL* Bayes db is empty at that point...
--
Since no one else is offering I guess I'll go with you... Do you know if they
allow air horns?
BTW, I got a free hat at Linux world that say's "Linux Rocks" by the guy at the
door because the hat I was wearing had a penguin with his head blown off... He
said it was "Inpropriate" (not a missp
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:04:00 -0500
Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Meta: In the future, please limit your line length, it makes it
> easier
> to reply.
Really? I have it set to wrap at 70 chars. Should it be less?
(Sylpheed Claws client). Let me try this: "Wrap before sending
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:00:15 -0400
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the SQL docs have more info
Doesn't appear to - there is no mention of either the words "restore" or "dump"
in the SQL docs or the UPGRADE file. Might be a nice addition before 3.0 goes
final.
> but IIRC
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 03:55:43PM -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
>
> My best guess is that after upgrading the configuration file to use
> the SQL settings, sa-learn --sync would migrate the current AWL/Bayes
> files in DB_File format to SQL. Is that correct?
>
Meta: In the future, please limit yo
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 03:55:43PM -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> My best guess is that after upgrading the configuration file to use the SQL
> settings, sa-learn --sync would migrate the current AWL/Bayes files in
> DB_File format to SQL. Is that correct?
--sync syncronizes the journal and the d
I've been reading through the 3.0 docs figured I'd upgrade a test box from 2.64
and play with it. I'm looking to use the SQL AWL/Bayes feature since I'm
already using the userpref feature.
My best guess is that after upgrading the configuration file to use the SQL
settings, sa-learn --sync w
You could give everyone their own login to mysql? (onerous)
Jason Levine wrote:
Is there any way to hide the SQL database password from users? Currently,
it's plaintext in the local.cf file, a file that has to be world-readable
in order for users to be able to use the spamassassin client in an set
I have not had time to read past the gush on the homepage:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/mailavenger/, but it gives me the
impression that you could drop it into postfix (as a replacement for
smtpd) and run per user SA.
Anyone have any experience with it?
--
Eric W. Bates
Good day, all,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3634572.stm , seen on
slashdot.
I don't know anything more than what's there, but it would be
marvelous if their claim of shutting off their spamming customers
within 10 days was true.
Just in case it does turn out to b
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Saklad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 12:02 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Usability. Spamassassin.
>
> Thank you for your interest in the usability of the
> spamassassin
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:36:55 -0700, Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It had to happen, I suppose. This morning I received a 996 KB message
> advertising, as near as I can tell, some Taiwanese take-out restaurant.
> And by Taiwanese, I don't mean style of cooking, but *location*.
> (Yeah, next
Hi Jack,
I think you can setup so-called "public" spam and ham (not-spam) imap folders
where all users can drop incorrectly tagged mail. Then you run a cron job
that gets SA to learn from these folders.
There was a guide on how to do exactly this on the SA wiki pages, I seem to
recall. Someone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2004 12:13:04 PM:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
[snip]
> > Although it would be nice if the links above actually looked like links
> > to Joe Average rather then being in the same colour as the actual
text!!
>
> they don't? they're in
Hello Folks,
We installed Spamassassin yesterday with great success. However,
we use Outlook as the primary email client; is there anyway to report spam
using Outlook?
Thanks
J.H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Hildebrandt writes:
> I'm using spamassassin from within amavisd-new. Loggin shows that
> amavis's SA-check is the most time-consuming step while processing an
> email (>>80% of the total time needed).
>
> How can I run spamassassin against some
Mark,
We set up our own integration package; however, you probably want
something like CGPSA - http://www.tffenterprises.com/cgpsa, which is a
pretty nice full-featured setup.
Cheers,
David.
-
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Mark Wendt (Contractor) wrote:
We've been long time users of sendmail with Sola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Hepworth writes:
> NM Public wrote:
>
> >
> > And then say something like: If you do not immediately know the answer
> > to all these questions, you should not be installing or administering
> > SpamAssassin (unless it is for educational pu
Thank you for your interest in the usability of the spamassassin
headers !
At this end spamassassin headers appear with messages in emacs rmail.
What puzzles people is how to use the headers effectively,
efficiently, where many have not the apparent mastery exhibited among
the other enthusiasts.
Don Saklad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/08/2004 11:46:34 AM:
> Who do you believe actually set it up?... stormloader.com/saklad
>
>
>IFRAME:
>http://216.98.142.114/cgi-bin/advertpro/banners.fcgi?
> region=7&keyword=NULL
>Click Here!
>
>The Don
Who do you believe actually set it up?... stormloader.com/saklad
IFRAME:
http://216.98.142.114/cgi-bin/advertpro/banners.fcgi?region=7&keyword=NULL
Click Here!
The Don Saklad Tribute pages logo
Don Saklad, BPL, Boston Public L
Hi,
[N.B.: I'm speaking generally to this thread, not specifically to Chris.]
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
> I was mistaken. MIT now teaches Trolling 101. [...]
I'm not willing to personalize this issue. SpamAssassin *is* difficult to
use and is probably unusable for most unskilled/
At 07:03 AM 9/8/2004, Seyyed Mehdi Sheikhalishahi wrote:
I installed qmail and spamassissin on it. I don't know how configure
spamass to have a blacklist, whitelist ?
How update spam database of spamass for new spammer?
First, read the manpage for the configuration. This will detail how to
change
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Sabatke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 11:35 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Unreasonable penalty for AOL addresses ending in numbers?
>
>
>Martin Hepworth wrote:
>> Jim
>>
>> Pierre's scores are similar t
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Obantec Support wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have upgraded from 2.60 to 2.64 but the test
> spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt > nonspam.out locks up.
> spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out works as expected.
Disk corruption, file corruption, lack of disk space?
--
Mike Burge
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Jim
Pierre's scores are similar to mine - what extra rules do you run, do
you use surbl.org and any RBL's/pyzor/razor/bayes stuff?
I find you need to add in alot of the SARE rules, surbl, bayes,
razor/pyzor to get the setup working well.
I use a lot of SARE rules. I als
At 16:43 07/09/2004, Don Saklad wrote:
How to use spamassassin explanations have not worked out for people
with no mastery of computers. There are neophytes and others not agile
with the learning curve unable to use spamassassin.
1. Install MailScanner. Plenty of installation help available, and it
>-Original Message-
>From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 10:52 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Usability. Spamassassin.
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>>
>>Is MIT teaching a course in useless sarcasim now? Both of
>your respo
Don Saklad wrote:
Here's the original question that did not get through !...
http://zork.net/~dsaklad/usabilityspamassassin.html
Are you aware that no question actually appears anywhere on that page?
It seems like it's perhaps a statement of frustration.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-qu
Hi
I have upgraded from 2.60 to 2.64 but the test
spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt > nonspam.out locks up.
spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out works as expected.
Any ideas?
Mark
Here's the original question that did not get through !...
http://zork.net/~dsaklad/usabilityspamassassin.html
Don Saklad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/07/2004 10:43:45 AM:
> How to use spamassassin explanations have not worked out for people
> with no mastery of computers. There are neophytes and others not agile
> with the learning curve unable to use spamassassin.
>
> Apparently compiling a list o
Chris Santerre wrote:
Is MIT teaching a course in useless sarcasim now? Both of your responses do
nothing to help this conversation.
Next time Bob might just answer RTFM, instead of actually trying to help
you.
http://www.stormloader.com/saklad/
Don is um... probably not looking for an answer. H
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 4:05 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: ANNOUNCE: ApacheCon US 2004 (SpamAssassin Sessions!)
>
>
>ApacheCon US 2004
>
> Alexis Park Resort
> Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
> 13-1
Chris Santerre wrote:
Antispam should NOT happen at the client!
It should happen at the ISP level. Otherwise POP3 or IMAP has already
downloaded the stupid thing. Whats the sense in that? SO you don't have to
read it, big whoop! Still took up your time already.
With ever more people on some form of
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 9:51 AM
>To: Pierre Thomson
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Unreasonable penalty for AOL addresses ending in numbers?
>
>
>Hello Pierre,
>
>Wednesday, September 8, 20
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 09:55:08 -0400 Don Saklad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See also
> usability
> http://www.google.com/search?q=define:+usability
Please rephrase this in the form of a question.
-- Bob
>-Original Message-
>From: Don Saklad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 9:55 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Usability. Spamassassin.
>
>
>See also
> usability
>http://www.google.com/search?q=define:+usability
Is MIT te
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm using spamassassin from within amavisd-new. Loggin shows that
> amavis's SA-check is the most time-consuming step while processing an
> email (>>80% of the total time needed).
>
> How can I run spamassassin against some mails to find out what part of
>-Original Message-
>From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 11:10 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: SpamAssassin help
>
>
>From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "lloe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> Hello lloe,
>>
>> Tuesday, September 7, 2004
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 7:12 PM
> To: Smart,Dan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mass-check errors
> TextCat looks for $rulesdir/languages, which via your above
> command is /etc/mail/spamass
Jim
Pierre's scores are similar to mine - what extra rules do you run, do
you use surbl.org and any RBL's/pyzor/razor/bayes stuff?
I find you need to add in alot of the SARE rules, surbl, bayes,
razor/pyzor to get the setup working well.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State
See also
usability
http://www.google.com/search?q=define:+usability
Hello Pierre,
Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 5:38:40 AM, you wrote:
PT> I have had a couple of FP's recently from valid AOL users. AOL
PT> recommends appending digits to your screen name to make it unique,
PT> and many users do that. The result (sender using AOL 9.0 client, SA
PT> 2.63) is a pen
Pierre Thomson wrote:
Martin,
The real egregious spams score up in the 20's and 30's, and the vast majority score over
12. What we review represents only a tiny fraction of the received spam, and some of the
"sham" which is hardest to categorize.
Pierre
I keep reading these numbers and they don't
Martin,
The real egregious spams score up in the 20's and 30's, and the vast majority
score over 12. What we review represents only a tiny fraction of the received
spam, and some of the "sham" which is hardest to categorize.
Pierre
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMA
Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How come. Unless you give a bonus to SPF pass, then there's no real
> incentive for legit domains to use it (until people start rejecting
> SPF fails... ).
We give points to SPF fails, so the incentive (in SpamAssassin) is that
forged mail using your dom
Pierre
glad to see you've got time to check this email - I leave this to the
users :-)
tends to be 1-2 per user per day, if that..much better than the 80+
spams a day they where getting!
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Pierre Thomson wrote:
I quarantine mail scoring between 6.0 and 12.0 (it's 99% spam) using
MailScanner's quarantine system. It's delivered to a spambox that I check
hourly during the day. We get only a couple of true FP's per week, and the
last two were from two different AOL addresses.
For a quick fix, I took AOL
>> I have had a couple of FP's recently from valid AOL users. AOL
>> recommends appending digits to your screen name to make it unique,
>> and
>> many users do that. The result (sender using AOL 9.0 client, SA
>> 2.63)
>> is a penalty of 6.39 points right off the bat. Isn't that a bit
>> extreme
> Hi
> I installed qmail and spamassissin on it. I don't know how configure
> spamass to have a blacklist, whitelist ?
> How update spam database of spamass for new spammer?
Ahhh, did you even attempt to read through some of the FAQ wiki or any
of the documentation on the SA homepage, or the distr
> I have had a couple of FP's recently from valid AOL users. AOL
> recommends appending digits to your screen name to make it unique, and
> many users do that. The result (sender using AOL 9.0 client, SA 2.63)
> is a penalty of 6.39 points right off the bat. Isn't that a bit
> extreme?
I know a
Pierre
depends on how you handle a score of 6.651 in MailScanner
I deliver (with Tagged subject) scores from 5-10, and block anything
with score > 10, so this kind of thing still ends up in the recipients
email.
You could lower the score of the rules in spam.assassin.prefs.conf, or
whitelis
I have had a couple of FP's recently from valid AOL users. AOL recommends
appending digits to your screen name to make it unique, and many users do that.
The result (sender using AOL 9.0 client, SA 2.63) is a penalty of 6.39 points
right off the bat. Isn't that a bit extreme?
Pierre Thomson
Hi
I installed qmail and spamassissin on it. I don't know how configure
spamass to have a blacklist, whitelist ?
How update spam database of spamass for new spammer?
Thanks.
NM Public wrote:
And then say something like: If you do not immediately know the answer
to all these questions, you should not be installing or administering
SpamAssassin (unless it is for educational purposes and for processing
only *your* email).
The Procmail web site needs this too!
NM
alr
On 7 Sep 2004 Bob Apthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[...]
If the answer is 'a WinXP user who retrieves mail via POP3 with Outlook
and who does not use the command line and does not program, not even a
little bit, and who wants a button to press to make spam go away' then
the answer is probably no
We've been long time users of sendmail with Solaris, along with
SpamAssassin, procmail, and John Hardin's ESD for virus scanning (thanks
John, it's worked great!) for the last couple of years. We're in the
process of upgrading our server, hardware wise, and will also be switching
over to Commu
On 7 Sep 2004 Joe Emenaker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
By the same token, the point was never to be able to spot spammers by noting
who isn't using SPF. Rather, the point is to make the blacklists more
reliable. It is *only* when you use SPF in *conjunction* with
blacklists/whitelists that you se
I'm using spamassassin from within amavisd-new. Loggin shows that
amavis's SA-check is the most time-consuming step while processing an
email (>>80% of the total time needed).
How can I run spamassassin against some mails to find out what part of
spamassassin (maybe some sort of external DNS query
> How come. Unless you give a bonus to SPF pass, then there's no real
> incentive for legit domains to use it (until people start
> rejecting SPF
> fails... ). The idea that spammers can pass SPF doesn't bother me at
> all, since I know that it will make the blacklists that much more
> effecti
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Although others have already given reasons why, I figured I'd toss in
the analogy to explain why the dude from CypherTrust in the article is
lacking in clue:
The SpamAssassin development team has been aware of SPF pass results
Hello,
I recently setup bayesian filtering with my mail system, Postfix +
Spamassassin.
I tried to train bayesian filter by forwarding spam to a particular
address e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], by following this reference in the web
http://jousset.org/pub/sa-postfix.en.html, and
even changed my MUA to
Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Although others have already given reasons why, I figured I'd toss in
> the analogy to explain why the dude from CypherTrust in the article is
> lacking in clue:
The SpamAssassin development team has been aware of SPF pass results for
spam since May (a
While revamping a little my quarantine scripts for SA
(http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/laboratory/email/quarantine.shtml) I
dicovered that the one script that report the incoming spam had an
error and it would be reporting the spam of user "foobar" to the user
"bar" (anyting ending with "bar" would be repo
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 6:26 am, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> > The file as it is now running, or not, is:
> >
> > #! /bin/bash
> > DEFFILES="/etc/mail/spamassassin/*.cf"
> > GREPSTR="describe"
> > cat $DEFFILES | egrep ^$GREPSTR \
> >
> > | awk '{ print "echo `fgrep " $2 "/home/robbo/.Mail/Spa
At 09:43 AM 8/21/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Here is a setup:
domain.com MX 10 relay1.domain.com
MX 20 relay2.domain.com
relay1 & relay2 have booth a SpamAssassing running.
Problem: when a mail is received on relay2, it's being check by SA
and tagged as spam. Later, relay2 sent it to relay1.
Hi,
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 22:26:58 -0400 Don Saklad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...to put into action or service : avail oneself of : employ
>
> Click on the verb
> use[2, verb]
> at
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=use&x=15&y=15
That really doesn't help, now does it?
From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lloe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello lloe,
>
> Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 9:47:13 AM, you wrote:
>
> l> Hello Fellow Users,
>
> l> When I saw Don's email " How neophytes without mastery of
> l> computers can use spamassassin. " I felt that I am someo
...to put into action or service : avail oneself of : employ
Click on the verb
use[2, verb]
at
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=use&x=15&y=15
Is there any way to hide the SQL database password from users? Currently,
it's plaintext in the local.cf file, a file that has to be world-readable
in order for users to be able to use the spamassassin client in an setuid
environment. (Thus, setting the file to disallow world reading results in
u
Hello guenther, George,
Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 2:46:13 AM, Guenther responded to George:
>> I have a cpanel hosting account with spamassassin where you only have
>> 3 options on the SA page. I can enable SA, enable a spam box, and
>> then another button to edit the user_prefs file.
Same he
Hello mort+spamassassin,
Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 10:32:20 AM, you wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert
Menschel writes:
>>LW> header SUB_UNDERSCORESSubject =~ /__/
>>LW> scoreSUB_UNDERSCORES0.1
>>LW> But don't use it, or at least not with any significant score.
>>Well,
Hello lloe,
Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 9:47:13 AM, you wrote:
l> Hello Fellow Users,
l> When I saw Don's email " How neophytes without mastery of
l> computers can use spamassassin. " I felt that I am someone who is also
l> in Don's shoes.
My impression wasn't that Don was a neophyte, unable to
Hello Don,
Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 8:43:45 AM, you wrote:
DS> How to use spamassassin explanations have not worked out for people
DS> with no mastery of computers. There are neophytes and others not agile
DS> with the learning curve unable to use spamassassin.
What do you mean by "to use spa
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Smart,Dan wrote:
> > Otherwise I would try explicitly running "mass-check -c
> > /path/to/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.64/rules"
>
> I did point to my 2.64 rules, per...
> ./mass-check -c=/etc/mail/spamassassin/ --progress --net --mbox
> /var/spool/procmail/tem
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 05:19:58PM -0500, Smart,Dan wrote:
> perl -d:DProf ./mass-check -c=/etc/mail/spamassassin/test --net --mbox
> /var/spool/procmail/tempfail
>
> Segmentation fault
>
> Any suggestions?
Yeah, that'd DProf... You can try rerunning it a few times, DProf is picky
sometimes. I
87 matches
Mail list logo
