Hello, spamassassinners.
I have some question about AWL, perhaps they're classified in novis class.
If my questions are FAQ, simply give me only pointer to the documents,
please.
(1) How to monitor AWL registered listings?
In my spambox, there are many various scored mail address.
I want
Hi,
Well, what I thought was fixed with the /root problem with a -u Spamd
user in spamd has not gone away, spamd is still trying to create
everything with root privileges. Do the devs have any ideas for me ?
Regards,
Rick
I know (I read changelog now) ... sorry.
But I have problem with this combination (SA3 + amavisd-new-20030616-p10):
Oct 5 15:33:11 x amavis[25039]: (24614-01) ESMTP: 500 5.5.2
Error: bad syntax; PENALIZE: ...
FIY: After PENALIZE: is only one line from email source.
Something in SA
I'm in the process of building a couple of new servers and to run some test
mail through, put one of them on the tertiary address for a domain. While I
know this topic was discussed a while ago I was surprised at what I was
seeing in the logs namely;
- all traffic to the tertiary was UCE
- there
On Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 10:28:06 AM, Nate Schindler wrote:
Once in a while, I notice a hit for an RBL-related test that seems a little
off. When I check for the existance of a record in the list, I can't find
one. Below is a match SA 3 found in an e-mail
from one of our dealers. I
At 08:25 AM 10/13/2004 +0900, MATSUDA Yoh-ichi wrote:
(1) How to monitor AWL registered listings?
In my spambox, there are many various scored mail address.
I want to monitor registered email address and scoring.
I couldn't find method for monitoring or dumping list.
If you look in
Is there any accepted method for expiring AWL entries? I'm currently
using the SQL implementation of AWL.
If there was no accepted method, my plan was to add a TIMESTAMP field
to the database and expire old records...
Thanks!
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I configure SpamAssassin to modify the subject of spam, the headers
break
up in 2 pieces...up to and including the Subject header remain headers.
All
headers after the Subject header move to the body/message part of the
mail!
Some people seem to be seeing this, others aren't.
I wonder if
LOL, oh please let me know how that conversation went!
Uh...yeah..hello. Is this Tanya? You actually exhist? Ok, thanks. *click*
I bet she slept well that night!
I got voicemail. :P Good thing about Vonage, you don't get long distance
charges. 6 pack of Pyramid Ale offerings, and I'll call
hi
my qmail server only acts as the spam/av gateway server to our internal
MS server(s).
i need to allow users, with mail accounts on our internal server(s), to
access the whitelist/blacklist functions of spamassassin but without
seeing the entire list, i'm only interested in allowing them to
I understand my problem might be rooted in Horde, amavisd-new, or
Postfix. However, I want to be sure it's not a fundamental
misunderstanding (on my part) of how SA should be setup.
Postfix filters mail via amavisd-new (which calls SA). Everything runs
smoothly except the Report as Spam link
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:31:28PM -0400, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Is there any accepted method for expiring AWL entries? I'm
currently
using the SQL implementation of AWL.
If there was no accepted method, my plan was to add a
TIMESTAMP field
to the database and expire old
What is likely happening is that sa-learn is running as root, with
nobody's permissions since apache su's itself to nobody by default on RH
9/FC1 (I am assuming this version of linux from the LC_ALL/LANG issue,
although mac osx is a possibility). When you click the link in horde, it
is
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 09:26, martin f krafft wrote:
1. ezmlm provides no NOMAIL feature. Many people use different
email addresses to read and post, or post from multiple email
addresses. I, for one, receive my list mail at an address
created specifically for this list (I do
I'm using SA in the environment described by Scott Vintinner at
http://www.flakshack.com/anti-spam/ (Fairly-Secure Anti-SPAM Gateway
Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC).
Things had been running smoothly until I recent upgraded from v2.6 to
3.0. The upgrade went
At 12:55 AM 10/13/2004 -0700, Chris Weiss wrote:
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 1
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: use_terse_report 0
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: auto_learn 1
debug: config:
On 10/12/2004 10:22 PM +0200, Brett Romero wrote:
I sent the following message through SA 3.0 on Windows.
[SNIP HTML]
The following were returned:
UPPERCASE_25_50 0.10 message body is 25-50% uppercase
MISSING_SUBJECT 1.40 Missing Subject: header ALL_TRUSTED -2.80 Did
not pass
On 10/13/2004 12:41 AM +0200, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
I'm running spamd on it's own server with the following command line
(under daemontools)
exec /usr/local/bin/spamd -q -x -m 10 --max-conn-per-child=20 -i
206.123.6.18 -A 206.123.6.19,206.123.6.18,216.162.64.120 -u Spamd 21
Try this as
-Original Message-
From: Ronan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:32 AM
To: spam
Subject: upgrade not going to plan
Just completed an upgrade to v3.0 from 2.63.
SA not accepting *any* external connections on the one mailhub i
upgraded on.
The
Dear Listers,
I'm having problems with spamd. It does not add any information to the
header.
I'm running version 3.0.0 of SA. I'm using a global procmailrc file. Further
am I running a Postfix mailserver and my distro is the SuSE Server.
/*
SENDER=$1
SHIFT=1
# Until now, mail is
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:04:49 -0500, Michael Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How odd, I was just writing a blurb about this in my ApacheCon
presentation. In the future, AWL will have some sort of expiration,
in the mean time, with SQL, I've had great success with a lastupdate
of type TIMESTAMP
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:58:43 -0500, Dallas L. Engelken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John, if you need expiry right now, you can use my patch on bug 3802 if
you want. It will basically do what Michael is talking about except for
purging count=1 entries.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Munday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:11 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [OT] Spammer behaviour
I'm in the process of building a couple of new servers and to
run some test
mail through, put one of them on the
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if SA had a rule or score that you could define a
specific word to look for. I don't get a lot of spam mail and SA has
been working well so far, but I've been getting a few loan apps lately.
They don't get any hits at all:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 6:10 PM
To: Brett Romero; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What Missing Subject?
At 05:37 PM 10/12/2004, Brett Romero wrote:
What is this test:
MISSING_SUBJECT 1.40 Missing Subject:
I need a shower after we removed this domain from SURBL:
hypnoticsellingsecrets.com
I would like to know if anyone gets a report of spam that has this domain in
it. They just make me feel all icky. The more I read their site, the more I
wished we didn't remove them. But...I need a spam.
Chris wrote:
Matt, I take it theres no check_whitelist in the cpan installed
version of 2.63? At least I can't find it. I did find
check_whitelist from the old 2.41 version I installed via Mandrake
RPM a while back.
It's always been included in the tarball so far as I recall; whether it
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 12:55 AM 10/13/2004 -0700, Chris Weiss wrote:
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
rewrite_subject 1
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
use_terse_report 0
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
Exactly. Sometimes you have nothing to go on but the 'feeling' that you are
being fed a load of horse crap. Even some of the people who always cry for
whitlisting on SURBL felt a little fishy about this one. So we give the
benefit of the doubt for the first time. But if we find you did feed us a
I apologize for the questions, but this is how my Boss wants
things done and who am I to argue with him. I figure he will listen to me
better if I have a creditable source, the SpamAssassin mailing list, backing me
up versus me by myself.
Part 1:
My boss is convinced that SpamAssassin
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
I would like to know if anyone gets a report of spam that has this domain in
it. They just make me feel all icky. The more I read their site, the more I
Icky ? The biggest reason I think this is a scam is -- he obviously hasn't
read his own book. I
J Thomas Hancock wrote:
I apologize for the questions, but this is how my Boss wants things done
and who am I to argue with him. I figure he will listen to me better if
I have a creditable source, the SpamAssassin mailing list, backing me up
versus me by myself.
Part 1:
My boss is
Hey,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:10:59 -0500, J Thomas Hancock wrote:
JTH[...]
JTH What are the thoughts of the members of this list? Does anyone
JTH have any other suggestions besides MailScanner and our two
JTH solutions?
Try amavisd-new. It integrates perfectly into the postfix mail system,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:13:53 -0400 (EDT)
Christopher X. Candreva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
I would like to know if anyone gets a report of spam that has this
domain in it. They just make me feel all icky. The more I read their
site, the more I
Kevin Peuhkurinen said:
J Thomas Hancock wrote:
I apologize for the questions, but this is how my Boss wants things
done and who am I to argue with him. I figure he will listen to me
better if I have a creditable source, the SpamAssassin mailing list,
backing me up versus me by myself.
I had this issue before where I got an error like this:
Argument isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 572.
I understand that you are supposed to change the rewrite subject line to
rewrite_header, which I did. My local.cf file is
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 04:30:41PM -0400, scohen wrote:
bayes_auto_learn
That line is the problem, you need a 1 or 0 (zero) there.
Michael
Jerry wrote:
Does anyone have a good list of RBL's they use that blocks majority of
the spam?
This comes up every few months (which is OK - spam changes, and so
various lists' effectiveness changes), but the most recent thread was
just two weeks ago. Check out the Preferred DNSBL thread:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 04:30 PM 10/13/2004, scohen wrote:
Your error is in the bayes_auto_learn line.. you need to specify a 1 or a 0
after it.
Thanks! I can't believe I missed that.
Steve Cohen
I'm running Spamassassin v3.0.0 on FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE, and I run spamd like
this:
/usr/local/bin/spamd -A 127.0.0.1 -L -x -u spamc -d -m 10
When I use `ps aux |grep spamd` I get this:
spamc 61970 0.5 3.9 21292 20032 ?? Is3:04PM 0:00.47
/usr/local/bin/spamd -A 127.0.0.1 -L -x -u
40 matches
Mail list logo
