Definitely not, I'm using SA 3.0.1 on a dual 1.13ghz P3 with 2gb RAM with
SCSI, processing a fair bit of mail.
I have 25 spamd children running, and the load is typically like this ;
> w
9:46AM up 9 days, 13:06, 1 user, load averages: 1.14, 1.46, 1.59
Cheers
Gav
On 28/10/04 9:13 AM, "emai
I install SpamAssassin 3.0.1 on Fedora 2, like this:
#perl Makefile.PL
#make
error message;
-
/usr/bin/perl version.h.pl
version.h.pl: creating version.h
spamc/configure.pl: version.h.pl: Fail to get the version from
Mail::SpamAssassin
Please use the --with-version= switch to specify it mann
email builder wrote:
BTW, SpamAssassin *is* CPU-intensive. It's designed that way ;)
But not as CPU intensive as I am seeing. According to others on this list, I
should not be seeing a mere five spamd children completely dominating a
2.8GHz(HT) processor.
How much email are you processing ?
Hav
> Does spamd burn up the CPU if you do not have the Bayes turned on?
> If not, then I humbly suggest to turn off the Bayes in SA and
> use bogofilter to handle the Bayes processing.
Unfortunately, with use_bayes set to zero, spamd children average probably
around 20% cpu and bounce regularly into
> BTW, SpamAssassin *is* CPU-intensive. It's designed that way ;)
But not as CPU intensive as I am seeing. According to others on this list, I
should not be seeing a mere five spamd children completely dominating a
2.8GHz(HT) processor.
> Tim B writes:
> > email builder wrote:
> > > I hurried
--- Tim B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> email builder wrote:
>
> > I hurried out and installed 3.0.1, thinking one of those memory/language
> > improvements mentioned in the release notes were going to be my savior...
> >
> > Sadly, 3.0.1's spamd has the same CPU-intensive behavior here. I am
>
--- Tim B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> email builder wrote:
> > I hurried out and installed 3.0.1, thinking one of those memory/language
> > improvements mentioned in the release notes were going to be my savior...
> >
> > Sadly, 3.0.1's spamd has the same CPU-intensive behavior here. I am
> so
SpamAssassin version 3.0.1
running on Perl version 5.8.5
Solaris 8
I get the following warnings when reporting spam:
# spamassassin -r < m1.msg
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm line
435.
Use of uninit
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> In general the "Argument "n.nn" isn't numeric in.." type complaints in
> Conf.pm usually mean you've got a configuration line in your config files
> which requires a numeric parameter, but you've left the parameter off, or
> put in
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: Shared Bayes but users own user_prefs
> At 03:58 PM 10/27/2004, Obantec Support wrote:
> >Thanks but it does seem like the loca
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Bart Schaefer wrote:
Here's the problem. I had the "enable-full-header-and-text" option set.
All good now, thanks.
-Dan
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:06:41 -0400 (EDT), Dan Mahoney, System Admin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I'm viewing full headers there is no attachment screen
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:06:41 -0400 (EDT), Dan Mahoney, System Admin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I'm viewing full headers there is no attachment screen -- the whole
raw message is before me. Know if this is a tunable?
In (m)ain -> (s)etup -> (c)onfig, s
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:06:41 -0400 (EDT), Dan Mahoney, System Admin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I'm viewing full headers there is no attachment screen -- the whole
> raw message is before me. Know if this is a tunable?
In (m)ain -> (s)etup -> (c)onfig, scroll down to "Viewer Preferences"
an
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Steven W. Orr wrote:
The solution is not in SA. You need to set up the VERPing. I don't know
what list manager you're using.
Personally, mailman -- but I'm setting this up more for finding things
like, say, exploited formmail scripts.
=>2) This is more a pine issue than anyth
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:05:44 -0400 (EDT), "Dan Mahoney, System Admin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Jeff Chan wrote:
>
> >> Pedantic nit-pick of the day:
> >> I'm sure you meant reject instead of bounce, right?
> >
> > "Bounce" to some means reject. "Bounce" to others means for
At 09:36 AM 10/14/2004, Hou, Ming wrote:
Was this problem happened in SpamAssassin 3.0 or early version?
I saw the same issue with SpamAssassin 3.0, it complained:
Argument "n.nn" isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 238.
However, I ha
On Wednesday, Oct 27th 2004 at 15:27 -0400, quoth Dan Mahoney, System Admin:
=>Hey all,
=>
=>I just started getting AOL's SCOMP emails, and after a little twiddling to
=>keep them from getting seen as spam by SpamAssassin, I've found a couple
=>issues with them. I was wondering if anyone else had
At 03:58 PM 10/27/2004, Obantec Support wrote:
Thanks but it does seem like the local.cf is being ignored! i am still
seeing users bayes files updating in their own $HOME/.spamassassin/
directory
Did you restart spamd? (local.cf is only parsed as spamd loads)
Did you run spamassassin --lint? (typo
At 04:03 PM 10/27/2004, Gary Manigault wrote:
=
Oct 27 14:55:08 AREA51 spamd[23120]: Couldn't create readable
default_prefs for [//.spamassassin/user_prefs]
Oct 27 14:55:49 AREA51 spamd[23162]: Creating default_prefs
[//.spamassassin/user_prefs]
=
It seems like spamd is the culprit but I
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:27:50 -0400 (EDT), Dan Mahoney, System Admin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) This is more a pine issue than anything else, but it seems when you're
viewing attached messages in pine, they're only seen in their "standard"
form (i.e. ther
Title: Message
I am running
Postfix, Procmail, SpamC / SpamD and I am getting the following messages
occassionally.
=
Oct 27 14:55:08
AREA51 spamd[23120]: Couldn't create readable default_prefs for
[//.spamassassin/user_prefs]
Oct 27 14:55:49
AREA51 spamd[23162]: Creating default_pre
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:27:50 -0400 (EDT), Dan Mahoney, System Admin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) This is more a pine issue than anything else, but it seems when you're
> viewing attached messages in pine, they're only seen in their "standard"
> form (i.e. there is NO way) to view full headers fo
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: Shared Bayes but users own user_prefs
> At 01:52 PM 10/27/2004, Obantec Support wrote:
> >I wonder if anyone has a sitewide con
> dyndns.org allows the use of non-standard ports for mail relay
>
> I'd be interested to see a message sent from your outlook client and one
> from the 'problem' machine in order to compare the headers. Feel free
> to directly send me one sample from each and I'll post the results.
>
Based on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin writes:
> Hey all,
>
> I just started getting AOL's SCOMP emails, and after a little twiddling to
> keep them from getting seen as spam by SpamAssassin, I've found a couple
> issues with them. I was wondering if anyone else
> As far as it working using Outlook Express that's because Squirrelmail is
> inserting its own Received header in there before delivering it to your
> ISP.
> When you send through Outlook Express the first hop is your ISP receiving
> the mail from you which has your dynamic IP as the sender. Spam
Bret Miller wrote:
I'm having problems whitelisting one of the mailing lists I'm
on.. a few
sparklist.com lists. I'm using SA 2.6x and amavisd-new. I can't just
whitelist the "From" because it's the "To:" field that I need to use..
Help. I'm too brain dead today to figure this one out.. blah.
Does spamd burn up the CPU if you do not have the Bayes turned on?
If not, then I humbly suggest to turn off the Bayes in SA and
use bogofilter to handle the Bayes processing.
> I'm having problems whitelisting one of the mailing lists I'm
> on.. a few
> sparklist.com lists. I'm using SA 2.6x and amavisd-new. I can't just
> whitelist the "From" because it's the "To:" field that I need to use..
>
> Help. I'm too brain dead today to figure this one out.. blah.
Ouch. I'd g
rewrite_header subject **SPAM**
this could have been better highlighted. but oh well...
--
Many thanks, knew it was probably something simple but had spent too long
readin the man pages, seems like they need updating
Jim, I cant find in my CHANGES file the correct syntax it just says
"...noted
I'm having problems whitelisting one of the mailing lists I'm on.. a few
sparklist.com lists. I'm using SA 2.6x and amavisd-new. I can't just
whitelist the "From" because it's the "To:" field that I need to use..
Help. I'm too brain dead today to figure this one out.. blah.
Here's the full heade
Hey all,
I just started getting AOL's SCOMP emails, and after a little twiddling to
keep them from getting seen as spam by SpamAssassin, I've found a couple
issues with them. I was wondering if anyone else had these issues, and if
anyone knew of any easy way around them.
1) AOL seems to like to le
marti wrote:
I'm running SA 3.0.0 and have put the following in user_prefs &
local.cf(restarted spamd):-
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag **SPAM**
But still not getting the subject tagged, what am I missing? All was fine
with the previous version.
Your missing the part where you read the CHANGES file
also sprach marti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.2107 +0200]:
> rewrite_subject 1
> subject_tag **SPAM**
rewrite_header subject **SPAM**
this could have been better highlighted. but oh well...
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*>
I'm running SA 3.0.0 and have put the following in user_prefs &
local.cf(restarted spamd):-
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag **SPAM**
But still not getting the subject tagged, what am I missing? All was fine
with the previous version.
Martin
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Jeff Chan wrote:
Pedantic nit-pick of the day:
I'm sure you meant reject instead of bounce, right?
"Bounce" to some means reject. "Bounce" to others means forward.
The distinction between forwarding and bouncing for me is the same as in
pine -- bounce means to simply re-email
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 08:31:25PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> URIDNSBL: ... inhibited further callbacks
>
> I get a LOT of these when doing a -D --lint. What does it mean, can I
> switch this off somehow?
This is turning into an FAQ.
Typically if the normal SA code doesn't know what to do wit
URIDNSBL: ... inhibited further callbacks
I get a LOT of these when doing a -D --lint. What does it mean, can I
switch this off somehow?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.or
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:59:36PM -0400, Dan Barker wrote:
> My system is Windoze/IMail (5sp4/8.13) and the harry and susan (shouldn't
> call them Ham and Spam, should I) folders contain all mis-identified email
> in one giant flat file each.
>
> Does this work?
If the file format is correct, su
I've been running SA for about a week now, and need to sa-(un)learn the FPs.
My system is Windoze/IMail (5sp4/8.13) and the harry and susan (shouldn't
call them Ham and Spam, should I) folders contain all mis-identified email
in one giant flat file each.
Does this work?
Must I bust them up into
At 01:52 PM 10/27/2004, Obantec Support wrote:
I wonder if anyone has a sitewide config for having the bayes files under
the spamd users .spamassassin directory and still let users have their own
$HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs
in local.cf set
bayes_path /home/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mo
Hi
SA2.63
I wonder if anyone has a sitewide config for having the bayes files under
the spamd users .spamassassin directory and still let users have their own
$HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs
Or is this not possible.
I don't want the bayes files to add to the users quota.
Mark
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:35:11AM -0400, Keith Hackworth wrote:
>> > I'm guess you want PMS::get_decoded_stripped_body_text_array().
>>
>> Thanks, Theo - this may work for html only messages, which might be good
>> enough for what I'm trying to do. I need just the HTML version of the
>> email.
I start spamd with the following.
=
#!/bin/sh
#
# spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon
#
# chkconfig: 2345 80 30
#
# description: spamd is a daemon process which uses SpamAssassin to
check
# email messages for SPAM. It is normally called by spamc
#
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:39:54AM -0700, Alan Shine wrote:
> use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/pm line
> 225(sometimes line 179)
>
> is it OK?
> is everything continue to work alright?
> have I encountered a little bu
At 10:03 AM 10/27/2004 -0500, Gary Manigault wrote:
1. I want to use the configuration of Postfix, Procmail Spamd /Spamc. I
have the spamd daemon running. I tried to have the box start spamc to
check for spam. I am not sure that I have set it up correctly.
Your call to spamc looks fine. What
Title: Message
Several
problems.
1. I want to use
the configuration of Postfix, Procmail Spamd /Spamc. I have the spamd
daemon running. I tried to have the box start spamc to check for
spam. I am not sure that I have set it up correctly.
Below is my procmailrc
script to call spamass
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:35:11AM -0400, Keith Hackworth wrote:
> > I'm guess you want PMS::get_decoded_stripped_body_text_array().
>
> Thanks, Theo - this may work for html only messages, which might be good
> enough for what I'm trying to do. I need just the HTML version of the
> email. No at
JP wrote:
But the problem is that my ISP, OptOnline, blocks port 25 both incoming
and outgoing so I am forced to use their SMTP server to get mail to the
outside world (I use a 'reflector' service from no-ip.com to get around
the incoming mail issue, I point my MX record to thier machine which in
t
Hi all,
II want to use mysql backend for users to define their own whitelist,
but I can't find any instructions on how to do so, can someone give me
a URL or pointers as to how to go about this? Also I would like to use
LDAP for mysql authentication.
Many thanks,
Yang
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
but if you
plan on running this on a production system with live users, it
is a death wish."
Death Wish ! I really don't think so. I run SpamAssassin+Razor+URI
checks and a good amount of rulesets with MailScanner, all written in
PERL on production syste
> JP wrote:
>>>Might I suggest recommending that the postfixer fix his postfix?
>>
>>
>> Thanks Matt!
>> I will certainly return the kind favor and pass your notes onto the
>> postfixer.
>>
>> Thanks again for taking the time!
>>
>> JP
>>
>>
>> --
>-Original Message-
>From: Ian FREISLICH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:12 AM
>To: Jeff Chan
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: very interesting article on refi spam
>
>
>Jeff Chan wrote:
>> On Wednesday, October 27, 2004,
At 08:29 AM 10/27/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Knowing that the more rules sets you add, the longer it takes to scan a
message, what rule sets do you recommend? I have found several sites with
sure sets such as The Rules Emporium and the SA wiki but I am certain I do
not need every rule set from those s
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 04:00:21PM -0400, Keith Hackworth wrote:
>> Is there a Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus method that will return just
>> the body of the message (no attachments/multiparts)? I need a
>> "non-pristine" message to speed things up in my plugins. I know there's
>> get_message
Knowing that the more rules sets you add, the longer it takes to scan a
message, what rule sets do you recommend? I have found several sites with
sure sets such as The Rules Emporium and the SA wiki but I am certain I do
not need every rule set from those sites.
Thank you,
Tom
> Might I suggest recommending that the postfixer fix his postfix?
Thanks Matt!
I will certainly return the kind favor and pass your notes onto the
postfixer.
Thanks again for taking the time!
JP
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Roel Bindels wrote:
> Hello Listers
>
> I know that this is not a subjuct that should be on this list,
> but can anyone advice me a virusscanner tool that works fine in my
> configuration with postfix, spamassassin, amavis
>
> greetings
> Roel Bindels
>
We have been succes
Hi,
I'm using SA 3.0.1 via spamd, running on Redhat 8.
some of the mails cause the spamd to write the following message:
use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/pm line 225(sometimes line 179)
is it OK?
is everything contin
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Roel Bindels wrote:
> Hello Listers
>
> I know that this is not a subjuct that should be on this list,
> but can anyone advice me a virusscanner tool that works fine in my
> configuration with postfix, spamassassin, amavis
I've been very happy with H+BEDV's AntiVir, with Aam
Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 12:16:24 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> > http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,118164,pg,1,RSS,RSS,00.asp
>
> > 'In an effort to understand the sordid world of mortgage spam, I
> > responded to several of the many such messages that flood my i
Hello Listers
I know that this is not a subjuct that should be on this list,
but can anyone advice me a virusscanner tool that works fine in my
configuration with postfix, spamassassin, amavis
ClamAV , http://www.clamav.net
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 12:31:58 AM, Roel Bindels wrote:
> I know that this is not a subjuct that should be on this list,
> but can anyone advice me a virusscanner tool that works fine in my
> configuration with postfix, spamassassin, amavis
We use ClamAV with amavis, postfix and spamassas
Hello Listers
I know that this is not a subjuct that should be on this list,
but can anyone advice me a virusscanner tool that works fine in my
configuration with postfix, spamassassin, amavis
greetings
Roel Bindels
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 12:16:24 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,118164,pg,1,RSS,RSS,00.asp
> 'In an effort to understand the sordid world of mortgage spam, I
> responded to several of the many such messages that flood my inbox. I
> discovered that
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,118164,pg,1,RSS,RSS,00.asp
'In an effort to understand the sordid world of mortgage spam, I
responded to several of the many such messages that flood my inbox. I
discovered that clicking and responding to these messages led to
callbacks from well-k
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 1:26:55 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
> http://www.projecthoneypot.org/
> seems interesting, they plan to share their resulting corpora, and they
> seem like nice guys too [...]
> --j.
FWIW I've donated 25 MX records to Project Honeypot so far.
It looks like a good project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel M. Drucker writes:
> Ed Kasky wrote:
> > I upgraded to 3.0.1 and noticed the following running "make test"
> >
> > t/dnsbl.Bareword found in conditional at t/dnsbl.t line 15.
> >
> > Lines 14 & 15:
> > use constant DO_RUN => TEST_ENAB
Hello Christopher,
Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 9:25:18 AM, Christopher X. Candreva
responded to Dave Duffner:
>> Is there a way, possibly with SpamAssassin, to
>> simply reject anything not going to a valid user account?
CXC> I think the question is, why are you accepting mail that isn't
CXC> goi
At 12:34 AM 10/27/2004 -0400, JP wrote:
Here are the Spam rules and headers from one of my e-mails that a kind
postfixer sent me:
You're not a spammer.. your kind postfixer just has a broken setup and
doesn't realize it.
First, it appears the kind postfixer has a broken trust path. The copy of
S
Just a quick note for ISPs / Virtual Servers that may be interested:
I manage the email flow for three domains which run on two virtual
hosting servers run by ArteryPlanet.net, Linux, exim, and of course
SA.
In the last three days the servers were upgraded from 2.63 to 3.0.1
There were a couple
So I have querried the Postfix list with this problem to no avail so I
come to you all the veritable encyclopedia of all things spam, although
this one is a little different.
In short mail that comes from my domain is being tagged as spam by
entities such as Hotmail and yahoo, as well as the spam
Ed Kasky wrote:
I upgraded to 3.0.1 and noticed the following running "make test"
t/dnsbl.Bareword found in conditional at t/dnsbl.t line 15.
Lines 14 & 15:
use constant DO_RUN => TEST_ENABLED && HAS_SPFQUERY &&
!(AM_ROOT && !IS_LINUX);
All the tests
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 6:49:39 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 06:14:30PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> "Bounce" to some means reject. "Bounce" to others means forward.
> Well, "bounce" (in this context) generally means that the receiving MTA
> accepts the message and then
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 06:14:30PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 11:43:38 AM, snowjack snowjack wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:37:38 -0400 (EDT), "Ron Johnson"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >> Seems to me that using some kind of Milter (I'd do it in Mimedefang,
> >>
Hi,
I have 2 servers. Server A & Server B.
Server B has a perfectly running copy of Spam Assassin 3.0.1 running on it,
and is acting as a "MX Proxy" doing SA systemwide via milter for those
domains going through it.
I want Server A, which is a mail server which a few thousand POP boxes, to
be ab
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 11:43:38 AM, snowjack snowjack wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:37:38 -0400 (EDT), "Ron Johnson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Seems to me that using some kind of Milter (I'd do it in Mimedefang,
>> but that's because I'm already using it) you could do something like:
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 8:36:21 AM, Frank Johansen wrote:
> Sorry for being a bit quick with my last mail. I got it to work now, was
> just an erroneously newline that got into the rules files when I cut & pasted.
Yes, I should have mentioned those rules are on three lines and
one of the li
78 matches
Mail list logo
