Hi,
first of all, this is my first post to this list, if this is the wrong
place for signed messages please tell and i'll turn it off.
Now to my problem:
I am using spamassassin Version 3.0.1-1 from debian unstable and i am
invoking spamc via my ~/.procmailrc as postet here:
8<--- ~/.procma
Greetings. I've just installed SA 3.0.1_2 on a FreeBSD 5.2.1 system
running Postfix 2.1.5,1 and procmail 3.22_5. All installs are from ports,
and I've included the output of "sa-learn -D --sync" below.
I've followed the SA wiki instructions for "UsedViaProcmail" but still
have two problems:
1.
> >why isnt my autolearn working?(ok so it was one quick questiona nd one not
> >so quick)
>
> Check to see if you have all the DB modules bayes needs to run.
>
> The debug output should show you if SA is skipping bayes entirely because
> it can't find DB_File or some other reason...
>
>
>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 11:26:02AM -0500, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
> I was referring to the fact that the newest "A" time is 20-something
> years in the future. Apparently, this is what is keeping it from
> expiring tokens.
>
>
This is a known problem with bayes in version < 3.0. Upgrade to 3.0.1
On Nov 24, 2004, at 10:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:26 PM 11/24/2004, Greg Earle wrote:
mipl:1:46 [/tmp] # spamassassin -D < SunTrust_spam |& egrep -i
received\|records\|Relays
debug: received-header: parsed as [ ip=137.78.38.32
rdns=mipl.jpl.nasa.gov
helo=mipl.jpl.nasa.gov by=miplnew.JPL
We had a similar problem with our system a while back (SA 2.64, Exim 4
using exiscan)
I found the attached script. It didn't work perfectly, so I edited it a
bit.
However, this was 2-3 months ago, and I didn't comment my changes (it
was only for my company ;) )
We had a problem that because i
Hi,
I'm trying to configure spamassain 2.64 on my redhat 9 mail server (sendmail
8.12.9).
I've tried to send me an email but I can't see X-Spam-Check on the mail.
So I think Spamassassin it's not working !
Spamassassin's daemon is running and my sendmail.mc file is :
OSTYPE(linux)dnl
DOMAIN(gene
I was referring to the fact that the newest "A" time is 20-something
years in the future. Apparently, this is what is keeping it from
expiring tokens.
Tim Gustafson
MEI Technology Consulting, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(516) 379-0001 Office
(516) 480-1870 Mobile/Emergencies
(516) 908-4185 Fax
http://
- Original Message -
From: "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've attached the output of "sa-learn --force-expire -D" to this e-mail.
>
> Is there any way to "repair" this problem? I'd like to keep the
> database since it's so incredibly effective right now.
All looks fine here, wh
At 09:34 AM 11/25/2004 +, Ronan wrote:
how can i tell if bayes is working?
why isnt my autolearn working?(ok so it was one quick questiona nd one not
so quick)
Check to see if you have all the DB modules bayes needs to run.
The debug output should show you if SA is skipping bayes entirely beca
I've attached the output of "sa-learn --force-expire -D" to this e-mail.
Is there any way to "repair" this problem? I'd like to keep the
database since it's so incredibly effective right now.
Thanks.
Tim Gustafson
MEI Technology Consulting, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(516) 379-0001 Office
(516) 480-
Here's the result from running it with ktrace (BSD equiv of systrace).
I've included what looks to be the headers from the last message it was
attempting to read.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 2 08:51:34 2004
Status: D
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from
Spamassassin learned with about 2000 spam messages and 4000 ham.
Our SA 3.0.1 site-wide setup was working fine until recently,
when we noticed that bayes stopped learning new messages
submitted as ham/spam via:
$ cat | /usr/bin/sa-learn --ham --no-sync --single --local
or
$ cat | /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam --no-sync --single --local
Although the above commands
Hi all!
I try to use spamassasin 3.0.1
My configs
init.pre:
cut
# This is the right place to customize your installation of SpamAssassin.
#
# See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' for details of what can be #
tweaked.
#
# This file will be loaded before *all other* configuration files,
Mathias Koerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are two tests I would like to use to whitelist incoming email.
>
> a) If it's References: or In-Reply-To: header matches a Message-ID
>of a mail sent out through my server. This would require
The main reason I haven't checked this in is bec
2 quick questions
how can i tell if bayes is working?
why isnt my autolearn working?(ok so it was one quick questiona nd one
not so quick)
Nov 25 09:30:37 elisha spamd[22430]: result: . 0 -
ALL_TRUSTED,J_CHICKENPOX_57,NO_REAL_NAME,PLING_PLING
scantime=2.8,size=2405,mid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,auto
Hi Daniel,
Interesting on the local dns issue. I am actually running spamd with the -L
option, and the local.cf is definitely being read as any changes I make
there are picked up apart from some DNS call it must be making to check
network connection every time it scans a message. I would love fo
There are two tests I would like to use to whitelist incoming email.
a) If it's References: or In-Reply-To: header matches a Message-ID
of a mail sent out through my server. This would require
a) recording M-IDs of outgoing emails ina formail -D
manner
b) expiring M-IDs from that l
"Will Kruss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have written a script which simply monitors the spamd processes and if one
> increases above 200mb virtual it gets killed, if that fails I'll look to
> implementing your suggestion Justin.
The patch Justin mentioned should help. Please try that befo
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
> How do you keep your ntokens so low?
>
> Mine averages ((nspam + nham) * 10). Yours is basically (nspam + nham).
> Do you run some job that expires tokens or something? I'm running
> sa-learn --force-expire once a day (and it takes about 2-3 minutes t
Thanks Theo
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 November 2004 07:35 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: need testers for a new memory patch
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 07:24:37AM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS
-Rosebank] wrote:
> What is
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 07:24:37AM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]
wrote:
> What is the correct syntax for patching?
> It keeps asking which file to patch.
When you're in the main directory of the unpacked tarball, run:
patch -p0 < patchfile
Then install and enjoy. :)
--
Randomly Ge
Hi List.
This is a really dumb question and I appologise for it but
I cannot seem to get the patch to work.
What is the correct syntax for patching?
It keeps asking which file to patch.
Thanks
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Dawn Keenan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 November 2004
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:19:49AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Quite frankly, I suspect corpus pollution. It really only takes 1 high
> scoring spam in the nonspam corpus to really screw up the message scores.
That's quite possible. I don't think anyone has 100% non-polluted corpus,
though try
On Wednesday 24 November 2004 05:45 pm, Chris wrote:
Don't even ask me what I did, because I could swear I had my local.cf setup
like this before when it wasn't working, but its working now:
add_header all DCC _DCCB_ _DCCR_
add_header all Pyzor _PYZOR_
X-Spam-DCC: dcc3mcgill cpollock 1275; Bod
I don't know if the below message got forwarded to this list, but
it didn't come back as non-existant or non-deliverable. Only
found out about this list when I searched for the mail lists on
source forge and found it had moved...
Original Message
Subject: spamassassin error messa
27 matches
Mail list logo
