Paul Grenda wrote:
I recently upgraded to SA3.0.1 but I still only seem to be able to catch
between 55% and 70% of spam. I read a thread started by Florian Effenberger
and there was advice that he should upgrade Net::DNS. So I ran
spamassassin -D --lint and it said debug: Net::DNS version is 0.26
On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 09:48 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 12:32 AM 12/26/2004 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> > > > Didn't SPEWS shut down and blacklist the world?
> > > >
> > > > Thomas
> > >
> > > No.
> >
> >Yes, they did - I found this article on Slashdot. Did they go down and
> >then come bac
At 12:32 AM 12/26/2004 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> > Didn't SPEWS shut down and blacklist the world?
> >
> > Thomas
>
> No.
Yes, they did - I found this article on Slashdot. Did they go down and
then come back later?
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238
Thomas
No, that's OSIRUSOF
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 13:10:04 -0900, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From your web page:
>
> "Bodytest" support - allows you to run filters like spamassassin and clamscan
> on the body of a mail message before replying to the final "." of the SMTP
> DATA command. (See the edinplace(1) ma
What I've do now is:
1) Spam over a certain score goes to /dev/null
2) Spam under a certain score, and over a certain score go to spamtrap
incase someone's looking for something.
3) Low scoring spam gets delivered the user with **SPAM** in the
subject which the users have a client side rules to
On Sat, 2004-12-25 at 10:06 -0800, SA wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 17:42, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>
> >
> > Didn't SPEWS shut down and blacklist the world?
> >
> > Thomas
>
> No.
Yes, they did - I found this article on Slashdot. Did they go down and
then come back later?
http://slashdot.org/
