On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:39:28AM +0200, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
> Is there a simple way to disable all default rules / scores?
Move aside/delete the default rule files. There's no point in a config
option to ignore other config options. ;)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Rock 'n' Roll had bec
Hi,
Is there a simple way to disable all default rules / scores? I would
like to group IP based blacklist as recommended in bug #4356 and more
fine grained bayes and razor rules. I have now changed my scores to 100
so the default rules have less impact but I wonder if there is a better
way.
Addit
Just a little more history on Chris Terrebonne: The page at
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/utilities.html
has a list of tools used to harvest email accounts and user names written
by Chris Terrebonne (though quite a while ago, and most are no longer
available - reasons not given).
>...
>
>On Sat, 21 May 2005 16:06:25 -0700 (PDT) List Mail User wrote:
>
>> Follow the trail; Chris Terrebonne's "NFP Inc." - snakeoil and
>> spam/scammers of Slidell, LA - (985) 726-0928. They've been around a very
>> long time (domains change weekly, but a few constants like remain
>> c
On Sat, 21 May 2005 16:06:25 -0700 (PDT) List Mail User wrote:
> Follow the trail; Chris Terrebonne's "NFP Inc." - snakeoil and
> spam/scammers of Slidell, LA - (985) 726-0928. They've been around a very
> long time (domains change weekly, but a few constants like remain
> conradpromotio
>...
>
>Hi,
>
>I believe treatment of certain diseases should be left to physicians,
>rather than to spam mails. The unique collection of dissimilar illnesses should
>make for a good rule :)
>
>Wolfgang
>
> begin spam
>
>The New Breakthrough of "The Antidote"
>PROVEN FORMULA Not availabl
Loren Wilton wrote:
I am not NAT'ed so I can see no reason why it is ALL_TRUSTED
I think I can:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 19588 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 22:45:07 +0100
Received: from 82-35-6-77.cable.ubr01.hari.blueyonder.co.uk (@82.35.6.77)
by secure.roshan.
It's Chinese in origin. Send a message to their ISP thanking them for
their order for 1000 Feng Shui information packets. "Now that I have
your attention please note that "ns006.bogebor.info", hosted on your
servers, is spamming the world with utterly bogus information.
Those in the US should "cc"
Hi,
I believe treatment of certain diseases should be left to physicians,
rather than to spam mails. The unique collection of dissimilar illnesses should
make for a good rule :)
Wolfgang
begin spam
The New Breakthrough of "The Antidote"
PROVEN FORMULA Not available in any retail o
Interesting problem here
I'm on a system that runs SpamAssassin through MIMEDefang globally... I
however an running it on my own account seperatly. I pass all my mail
through spamassassin -d, but not all of the markup gets removed...
I still get messages that have been modified by the global Spa
I'm not sure why your score is changing, since the list of hit tests seems
to be the same. Two points though:
> (command "spamassassin spam.txt")
I had always thought it was "spamassassin I am not NAT'ed so I can see no reason why it is ALL_TRUSTED
I think I can:
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTEC
> Do i copy and paste the contents of german.cf into my local.cf or just
> download the german.cf into /etc/mail/spamassassin ?
Either one. SA will load all files ending in *.cf in alphabetical order by
file name.
Simplest to just drop the new file into the directory.
Remember to restart spamd,
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:59:18PM +0300, George Breahna wrote:
> Spamd is running properly, as the very next message has a proper score.
> What else can cause this ?
>
> > Clear:RC:1(69.49.133.21):SA:0(?/?):
Since that isn't a SpamAssassin log message (qmail-scanner maybe?) I'd ask
whoever it i
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Raphael Clifford wrote:
> razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Razor2 report requires
> authentication at
>
> What can I do to fix it?
Read the Razor docs. In this case, SA is telling you that Razor requires you
to have authentication inform
Hello,
I use spamassain behind amavisd-new. I get two prblems with BAYES:
1) my imap folders are scanned everyday some for HAM some for SPAM, everyday
ssa-learn tells it learned from all messages although some are not new
2) some of my messages are checked for BAYES (and therefore have BAYES
On Sat, 21 May 2005, Raphael Clifford wrote:
I have what appears to be a fully functional spamassassin 3.0.3 set up with
all network tests working. However,
spamassassin -r samplespam.txt
Try "spamassassin -r < samplespam.txt"
You have to direct the input with a "<"
HTH.
Ed
. . . . . .
Menno van Bennekom wrote:
FYI, so far I only found 3 of these right-wing mails in my company.
It seems almost all have been blocked by the RBL's in postfix:
- dynablock.njabl.org
- dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
- and a lot of dsl* dial* provider-domain-names I blocked in postfix.
This helps for all kinds o
I have what appears to be a fully functional spamassassin 3.0.3 set up
with all network tests working. However,
spamassassin -r samplespam.txt
gives me
razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Razor2 report requires
authentication at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth Porter wrote:
| I'd like to knock together a utility for invoking SA against messages in
| an IMAP store..[snip]
Kenneth,
I use DMZS-sa-learn here, with some local modifications.
http://www.dmzs.com/tools/files/spam.phtml
Regards,
Craig.
--
George Breahna wrote:
Spamd is running properly, as the very next message has a proper score.
What else can cause this ?
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 14:24, George Breahna wrote:
I get plenty of weird looking messages in my spamassassin logs.
Some of them look like this:
Clear:RC:1(69.49.133.21
Spamd is running properly, as the very next message has a proper score.
What else can cause this ?
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 14:24, George Breahna wrote:
> I get plenty of weird looking messages in my spamassassin logs.
>
> Some of them look like this:
>
> Clear:RC:1(69.49.133.21):SA:0(?/?):
>
>
I have a spam message (attached below) which is causing all kinds of
problems. The first is that the score is
(command "spamassassin spam.txt")
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
autolearn=unavailable version=3.0.3
I am not NAT'ed so I can see no reason
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 14:09, List wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "wolfgang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 9:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Bombarded by German political spam
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> >>> it uses a score of 8 a
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 14:24, George Breahna wrote:
> I get plenty of weird looking messages in my spamassassin logs.
>
> Some of them look like this:
>
> Clear:RC:1(69.49.133.21):SA:0(?/?):
>
> Usually, it should say something like (20.0/5.0) but I get question marks!
>
> What could it mean ?
I get plenty of weird looking messages in my spamassassin logs.
Some of them look like this:
Clear:RC:1(69.49.133.21):SA:0(?/?):
Usually, it should say something like (20.0/5.0) but I get question marks!
What could it mean ?
George
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "wolfgang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Bombarded by German political spam
Hi!
it uses a score of 8 and /i - anyway, it might save you some effort ;)
Just finished
26 matches
Mail list logo
