On Tuesday, June 7, 2005, 6:34:22 PM, Tom Kern wrote:
> I keep getting spam with url's of know spammers but i never see the email
> tagged or blocked.
> i'm running sa 2.63(yeah, i know i gotta upgrade) and i block the mail with a
> score of 4 and tag at 3.
> spamcop_uri's score is 4 by default
FYI to the handful of people that use it, the ldapfilter.pm plugin on
http://www.ntrg.com/misc/ldapfilter/ has been updated to v0.02
The significant change was the use of an eval {} timer block around the
LDAP searches, so that if Net::LDAP doesn't come back on its own, the
plugin timer kicks in.
Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
06/08/2005 02:03:08 PM:
> According to the wiki, Backhair is unnecessary with SA 3.0.0 (and
presumably
> the newer versions as well).
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
>
> Bowie
Ah, that's right. I couldn't remember why I
wasn't r
I made a fresh install and got the same errors.
Here are the cf files I found on my machine
etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/70_sare_evilnum0.cf
/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/70_sare_random.cf
/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf
/etc/mai
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I haven't seen weeds hit in some time. But I only look at low-scoring
> spam, and it may well be that some of the really high-scoring stuff had
> help from weeds.
>
> Tripwire and Chickenpox and Backhair are still quite helpful in my
> opinion, if
Jonathan Lutz wrote:
> I have just set up a little mail server with Postfx and Spamassassin
> 2.63 with the newest Razor installed (of course). Spamassassin seems
> to be working fine, and running spamassassin -D --lint shows Razor
> appearing to be working fine.. but unfortunately it is not taggi
I have just set up a little mail server with Postfx and Spamassassin2.63 with the newest Razor installed (of course). Spamassassin seemsto be working fine, and running spamassassin -D --lint shows Razorappearing to be working fine.. but unfortunately it is not tagging anymessages. So far I have
I haven't seen weeds hit in some time. But I only look at low-scoring spam,
and it may well be that some of the really high-scoring stuff had help from
weeds.
Tripwire and Chickenpox and Backhair are still quite helpful in my opinion,
if you are in an english speaking situation. Some of these ca
Tieum wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to install RulesDuJour
>
> My problem is I cannot update because there are some problems with standrad
> SA
> rules. Where does this come from ?
>
Any chance you're using a LANG other than en?
AFAIK many of the non-English rule descriptions were not rewri
I'm getting ready to upgrade to a new
server and have been looking through the rules that I use. I know
that the chickenpox and weeds rules haven't been updated in a very long
time. But have they or a variation of them been incorporated into
the new SA releases or new SARE rules? Should I still
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:56:15AM +0200, Sven Riedel wrote:
> I'll have to see if the plugin mechanisms allow the passing
> back of changed mail content somehow.
Not in as much as you would have to directly manipulate the internal message
structure. The parsing bits are wholy separate from the
>-Original Message-
>From: Geoff Soper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 4:36 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Mortgage spam
>
>
>About half of the false negatives I now get concern mortgage offers.
>Currently I have the following rulesets installed
>
> Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > I'm running a more recent snapshot and URI's that are
> dotted-decimal
> > are not being reversed and checked properly against
> uridnsbl lists.
> > For example, a test on '202.99.223.139'.
>
> You mean they ARE being lookup up, right? Not are not?
>
Yes,
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
SpamAssassin 3.0.4 is released! SpamAssassin 3.0.4 contains several
important bug fixes and is highly recommended for use over previous
versions.
STILL http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3949 isn't
included. Why? Am I the
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
SpamAssassin 3.0.4 is released! SpamAssassin 3.0.4 contains several
important bug fixes and is highly recommended for use over previous
versions.
STILL http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3949 isn't
included. Why? Am I the only one who thinks this is a
You appear to have a bunch of 2.63 or earlier rules that you are trying to
use with 3.0.x. You also seem to have a number of old outdated local copies
of the SARE rules, which aren't the ones being updated by RDJ.
Depending on how you did the installation, which OS you are using, and which
packag
Geoff Soper wrote:
About half of the false negatives I now get concern mortgage offers.
Currently I have the following rulesets installed and updated by rules de
jour.
SARE_ADULT
SARE_GENLSUBJ0
SARE_HEADER0
SARE_HTML0
SARE_OEM
SARE_RANDOM
SARE_RATWARE
SARE_SPECIFIC
SARE_SPOOF
SARE_BML
EVILNUMBERS
About half of the false negatives I now get concern mortgage offers.
Currently I have the following rulesets installed and updated by rules de
jour.
SARE_ADULT
SARE_GENLSUBJ0
SARE_HEADER0
SARE_HTML0
SARE_OEM
SARE_RANDOM
SARE_RATWARE
SARE_SPECIFIC
SARE_SPOOF
SARE_BML
EVILNUMBERS
Are there any others
From: "Maurice Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:04 AM
The wiki server is down
Making HTTP connection to wiki.apache.org
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
I hate to reply myself but forget it he is back online
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-I
Hello,
The wiki server is down
Making HTTP connection to wiki.apache.org
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
> I suspect that you could do this as a plugin, but I also
> suspect you would
> have to take ugly liberties with the internal data storage in SA. For
> instance, I suspect (but do not know) that plugins are
> probably not supposed
> to modify the mail text.
Well, the modification would not be
21 matches
Mail list logo
