As for the all caps rule, it is hard to understand why it was written
not to fire on a single
excessively long word.
Probably because end users are morons and think that if they put lots of
capital letters in the subject that you'll somehow prioritize it
differently. Our helpdesk guy is
From: Thomas Booms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's the content of my local.cf:
rewrite_subject 1
report_safe 2
trusted_networks
user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql::
user_scores_sql_username
user_scores_sql_password
user_scores_sql_custom_query SELECT preference, value FROM
Hi all,
due to some config probs i believe, i need to learn the machine
spams/hams new. How can i do that?
Thomas
--
Booms EDV
- hosting more -
Herrenstrasse 10
D-59073 Hamm
www.booms-edv.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there documentation available on all the prerequisites and setup
necessary for it to operate correctly?
On Jul 9, 2005, at 8:39 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:47:22PM -0400, Dr Robert Young wrote:
Is there any information available on what configuration your
Dr Robert Young wrote:
Is there documentation available on all the prerequisites and setup
necessary for it to operate correctly?
On Jul 9, 2005, at 8:39 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:47:22PM -0400, Dr Robert Young wrote:
Is there any information available on what
Hi Cedric. Welcome to the group. I can make some suggestions, although I
can't answer all your questions.
1.You should almost certainly have the SURBL rules enabled. Maybe this
is what you mean by spamcop rules, or maybe that is something else. The
SURBL rules should be enabled by default
This brings up a question. Why are these sent out? To validate addresses
perhaps?
Virtually all of the ones I see typically also lack either or both of a
subject and a To: address. They very typically have some header information
mangled also.
My belief is that one of the spammer tools (I
On 7/10/2005 3:12 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
Anybody got a rule that will catch messages that don't have a body?
There are things like that around. I have a rather draconian pesonal
rule I use. There is a much milder form in one of the SARE rulesets.
The problem is you can't check just
I guess I should have asked the obvious question:
and if so, could you post it?
Well, I'd hoped that the 'draconian' would detract from that idea. But
since you ask anyway, I went looking. And discovered that I *don't* have a
rule for this anymore! I'm just getting by on the SARE rules
Anybody got a rule that will catch messages that don't have a body?
3.1.0-pre3 has this already...
-
# __MIME_ATTACHMENT defined in 20_html_tests.cf
body __NONEMPTY_BODY/\S/
meta EMPTY_MESSAGE !__MIME_ATTACHMENT !__NONEMPTY_BODY
describe EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears
On 7/10/2005 3:49 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
However, if you want something like this, just off the top of my head:
header __HAS_TOTo =~/\S/
body__HAS_BODY/\S/
metaEMPTY_MSG(!__HAS_TO !__HAS_BODY)
Good idea. rawbody works better but the model is right.
--
Eric A. Hall
Rawbody will miss the subject, so you will need to add a test for that too.
Loren
On 7/10/2005 4:56 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
Rawbody will miss the subject, so you will need to add a test for that too.
I'm not looking for that
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
Hello,
nearly a year ago, i had trouble upgrading to 2.64. the problem ist still
present.
running 2.64 leads to mass syslog filling due to this lines:
Jul 10 22:41:35 xx spamd[15244]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at /opt/gnu/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/S
Just to add my 2 Euro-Cent:
Something like this might actually exist (in as far as gif-only spams
are of interest).
Bert Ungerer, an editor with the German IT magazine 'iX', developed a
procmail-based AntiSpam-System he called 'NiXSpam'.
One part of it is a list of MD5-hashes of parts of the
Does anyone have a rule to chech the envelope To: against the header
to: ? I'm sure that there's a reason why it's allowed to be different,
but it doesn't apply here, and almost half of the spam that gets thru
everything else would get stopped by that.
Thanks!
Mike-
--
Mornings: Evolution in
Thomas Booms wrote on Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:40:56 +0200:
due to some config probs i believe, i need to learn the machine
spams/hams new. How can i do that?
Delete the Bayes db files (files starting with bayes_).
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Does anyone have a rule to chech the envelope To: against the header
to: ? I'm sure that there's a reason why it's allowed to be
different, but it doesn't apply here, and almost half of the
spam that gets thru everything else would get stopped by that.
[First I am new here and so may know
Loren Wilton wrote:
This is quite interesting, and seems reasonably obvious that with the right
sort of mail (at least, maybe with any mail) this shoudl work better, since
it self tunes to your conditions. It does of course assume a reasonable
fp/fn rate to start, but SA is generally pretty
19 matches
Mail list logo
