in wiki://BayesInSpamAssassin it is said:
Do not train Bayes on different mail streams or public spam corpora.
These method will mislead Bayes into believing certain tokens are
spammy or hammy when they are not.
Could you explain why it is so, and what could happen if to teach
nayes from several
Is there any rules available for catching messages that use the unicode
right to left override in HTML to reverse text (sample attached)?
For instance 'H#8236;olle#8238; W#8236;dlro#8238;' would render as
'Hello World'
I've seen a couple of these sneak thru recently. I don't want to create
a
Hello,
I installed spamassassin a month agowiththebayes auto learn option, but there is still 60% of spam that is not detected. In my bayes db there was nothing ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# sa-learn --dump magic0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nspam0.000 0
I forgot ... the version !
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# spamassassin -VSpamAssassin version 3.0.4 running on Perl version 5.8.0
Hello,
I installed spamassassin a month agowiththebayes auto learn option, but there is still 60% of spam that is not detected. In my bayes db there was
If I am understanding this correctly...the concern is that the Bayes
should match the mail server in which the ham and spam was received on
only?
David Roth
rothmail (at) comcast.net (dot) net
On Nov 18, 2005, at 5:10 AM, qMax wrote:
in wiki://BayesInSpamAssassin it is said:
Do not train
Hi,
I actually think it is more to do with the fact that one person's
spam could be another person's ham. If the mail streams and servers
are carrying messages for a community of users who receive (and want
to receive) similar types of email messages, I can't see any major
problem with using
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 1:47:24 PM, you wrote:
SL I guess if this is the case I need to lower
SL the score for that rule as my kill value is a 3.5, ...
SpamAssassin scores are optimized for a this is spam threshold of 5.
Anyone who
I see. That's a very good point, about sharing the Bayes within a
different community.
Anyone see a problem with a single-user collecting spam (and ham) from
various personal mailboxes that came in from different internet service
providers and doing a sa-learn on it?
David Roth
rothmail
Hi,
I see. That's a very good point, about sharing the Bayes within a
different community.
Anyone see a problem with a single-user collecting spam (and ham) from
various personal mailboxes that came in from different internet
service providers and doing a sa-learn on it?
This really
I am still receiving spam, that is wrapped in html code. I am not sure
why this rule I added is not picking it up. From what I read, it seems
to work for others, but adding it to my local.cf, and running -lint with
no errors, my spam checks still ignore it. What can I do to stop this?
I`m getting some spams with Return-Path: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then I did this rule.
header EL_NOBODY_RP Return-Path =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
describe EL_NOBODY_RP Contém nobody no return path
score EL_NOBODY_RP 1.0
What do you
Folks:
I just got a message that was flagged as spam due to the URIBL_JP_SURBL
rule ... it matched on the URI 'range.com' ... my domain, midrange.com,
is what triggered it.
3.4 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL
blocklist
[URIs: range.com]
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 11:55, Christian Recktenwald wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 11:42:44AM -0800, John Woolsey wrote:
It would be an interesting addition to a honeypot. Make the mail server
just hang up and not respond to tie up connections on the spammer.
There's a cool piece of
Elton Ramos Carvalho wrote:
I`m getting some spams with Return-Path: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then I did this rule.
header EL_NOBODY_RP Return-Path =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
describe EL_NOBODY_RP Contém nobody no return path
David Gibbs wrote:
Folks:
I just got a message that was flagged as spam due to the URIBL_JP_SURBL
rule ... it matched on the URI 'range.com' ... my domain, midrange.com,
is what triggered it.
3.4 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL
blocklist
in wiki://BayesInSpamAssassin it is said:
Do not train Bayes on different mail streams or public spam
corpora. These method will mislead Bayes into believing
certain tokens are spammy or hammy when they are not.
Could you explain why it is so, and what could happen if to
teach nayes from several
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Three firewall rules I think nobody should live without:
1) ipfw add 500 allow tcp from any to me 25 limit src-addr 2 setup
Yup, you read that right. Limits tcp connections to no more than two
per connecting address. You could probably even drop that to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin W. Gagel writes:
in wiki://BayesInSpamAssassin it is said:
Do not train Bayes on different mail streams or public spam
corpora. These method will mislead Bayes into believing
certain tokens are spammy or hammy when they are not.
Could
Elton Ramos Carvalho wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Elton Ramos Carvalho wrote:
I`m getting some spams with Return-Path: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then I did this rule.
header EL_NOBODY_RP Return-Path =~ /[EMAIL
On Nov 17, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Kelson wrote:
incoming mail. I turned them back on, unsubscribed from everything
for a few months to weed out any legitimate mailing lists that the
old users might have subscribed to, and eventually turned them into
spam
I would vote that these ligitimate
I would vote that these legitimate mailing list are not so
legitimate if they can't clean up bounces after several years of
getting them.
Legitimate != well-run.
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com
In our family, happy usually involves gunfire and at least
two patrol cars
Hello,
OS: RHES 3.0
SA 3.1.0
spamd start options: SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -D -q -x -m5 -H -u qscand
--max-conn-per-child=10
spamass-milter 0.3.0
spamass-milter start options: SM_EXTRA_FLAGS=-i xx.xxx.xx.0/24 -r 21 -u
qscand -x -- -f -s 64000
Here is the output from running spamd -q -D, then running echo
Hi
I would like to display SA summaries in HTML tables. I have a problem
with 'new lines' added of summary items that are too long to fit in
one line, e.g. please see the summary below. The description of a test
does not fit in one line.
URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL
23 matches
Mail list logo
