Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 22 January 2006 00:31, jdow wrote: >From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> On Saturday 21 January 2006 22:06, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >>>On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 09:44:54PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: Ok, I just set that up in kmail, triggered by 'does not contain' "X-Spam-

Re: rbldnsd on FreeBSD

2006-01-21 Thread Jeff Peng
hi,Irina, rbldnsd is really a simple dns server.you can use it directly,no any need to bind.and,you can use rsync to download the rbl files. > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: "Irina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: > Betreff: rbldnsd on FreeBSD > Datum: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:57:02 -0500 > > Hel

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread jdow
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Saturday 21 January 2006 22:06, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 09:44:54PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: Ok, I just set that up in kmail, triggered by 'does not contain' "X-Spam-Status" It's worth noting that you're likely to cause a m

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread jdow
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 09:44:54PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: Ok, I just set that up in kmail, triggered by 'does not contain' "X-Spam-Status" It's worth noting that you're likely to cause a mail loop on your machine. If the header doesn't exist aft

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 21 January 2006 22:06, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 09:44:54PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >> Ok, I just set that up in kmail, triggered by 'does not >> contain' "X-Spam-Status" > >It's worth noting that you're likely to cause a mail loop on your > machine. If the hea

Re: rbldnsd on FreeBSD

2006-01-21 Thread Randy Smith
Irina wrote: Hello all, Thank you for your answers on SURBL (few days back). I decided to install rbldnsd with rsync and have few things to ask. It will run on FreeBSD 5.4 with no named running. Server uses resolve.conf with 2 our DNS servers. Do I need to use BIND with rbldnsd and rsync? O

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 09:44:54PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > Ok, I just set that up in kmail, triggered by 'does not > contain' "X-Spam-Status" It's worth noting that you're likely to cause a mail loop on your machine. If the header doesn't exist after passing through SA the first time, the h

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread Loren Wilton
How is SA being called? Some of the integration tools do not use SA headers at all, they install their own. Others will only install the SA headers if the mail is classified as spam, and leave the pristine message if for whatever reason it wasn't classified as spam (thus making it impossible to s

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 21 January 2006 20:42, jdow wrote: >From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] >> An interesting thought just came to mind, Joanne. Could one check >> for the header added, and if not present, just repeat the scan by >> pipeing it thru spamc again? What you say would tend to show

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread jdow
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Saturday 21 January 2006 18:40, jdow wrote: From: "Spam Ass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 1/21/06, Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So does SA mark EVERY email with the: X-Spam-Status: Yes/No header? The only time I have run into an email not being tag

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 21 January 2006 18:40, jdow wrote: >From: "Spam Ass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On 1/21/06, Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So does SA mark EVERY email with the: >> X-Spam-Status: Yes/No header? > >The only time I have run into an email not being tagged is when the > email was over a

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread jdow
From: "Spam Ass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 1/21/06, Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So does SA mark EVERY email with the: X-Spam-Status: Yes/No header? The only time I have run into an email not being tagged is when the email was over a certain size. I believe the default max size is 256kb.

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread Spam Ass
On 1/21/06, Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:   So does SA mark EVERY email with the: X-Spam-Status: Yes/No  header?The only time I have run into an email not being tagged is when the email was over a certain size.  I believe the default max size is 256kb.  This can be changed on a per user or global

X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread Robb
Hello All,     I am working with a customer who is complainiing that Spam Assassin is not working correctly becuase it is not putting headers into some emails.   So does SA mark EVERY email with the: X-Spam-Status: Yes/No  header?   The customer gave header information which seems to be lack

Re: Rule Help

2006-01-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:17:50PM -0600, Rob Poe wrote: > I need a custom rule that looks for > X-Status: F > In the header, and adds a value to the score. (i.e. 2.5) > If anyone has some direction .. :) header X_STATUS_F X-Status =~ /^F$/ score X_STATUS_F 2.5 -- Randomly Generated Tagl

Rule Help

2006-01-21 Thread Rob Poe
I need a custom rule that looks for X-Status: F In the header, and adds a value to the score. (i.e. 2.5) If anyone has some direction .. :) thanks! CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail message and all documents that

rbldnsd on FreeBSD

2006-01-21 Thread Irina
Hello all, Thank you for your answers on SURBL (few days back). I decided to install rbldnsd with rsync and have few things to ask. It will run on FreeBSD 5.4 with no named running. Server uses resolve.conf with 2 our DNS servers. Do I need to use BIND with rbldnsd and rsync? Or only rbldnsd

Re: Bit OT, help needed with a regex, please

2006-01-21 Thread Loren Wilton
I can't see anything wrong with the regex. My guess is that shell quoting and substitution might be biting you. Did the original working regex have parends around it? If not, looking at some of the other lines in that witches brew makes me think that maybe you need a backslash in front of each p