Ok, that's a perfect answer to my questions..I didn't think of the DB
preallocation.
Thanks!
Steven
On Jan 26, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:52:20AM +0100, Steven Moix wrote:
I'm currently running a mail server with Postfix + amavsid-new + SA
3.1 with
Hi all, I have spamassassin 2.64 running on a SuSE Enterprise 9 running
postfix as smtpd.
My spamassassin system is leaking most spam messages (60-80%) without
tagging them.
I have done some configuration tests:
# spamassassin --lint gives no output error.
# spamassassin /tmp/spam-message
Chris
That seemed to work ta - I'll me a little more careful with editing next
time...
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 January 2006 17:29
To: Martin
Hi,
The Amavis is generated this error in /var/log/maillog:
Jan 27 04:03:40 jacaranda amavis[26216]: (26216-01) SA TIMED OUT,
backtrace: at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm line
1846\n\teval {...} called at
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.7 required=4.0
This says it is spam. The X-Spam-Report also says that.
It would seem you have aproblem in Postfix, that it is doing something wrong
with the message.
Loren
Looks like Amvis thought an SA transaction was taking too long. The
backtrace seems to indicate that SA was in Bayes.
I suspect that you have a fairly large bayes database, and this user got hit
with a bayes expiry run. Since Amvis killed SA before this could complete,
it will probably keep
Hi Loren,
Loren Wilton wrote:
Looks like Amvis thought an SA transaction was taking too long. The
backtrace seems to indicate that SA was in Bayes.
I suspect that you have a fairly large bayes database, and this user got hit
with a bayes expiry run. Since Amvis killed SA before this
In what way is a postfix issue?. I guess the usual message flow is
postfix - amavis - spamassassin - postfix - imap_user_inbox
Why would postfix rewrite the subject of a message already tagged with
SPAM
-Mensaje original-
De: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el:
Do you run amavisd-new (which is shipped with SLES9, I think)
If you do, there's the culprit: amavisd-new does its own spam testing
using the spamassassin code directly (not via spamc/spamd)
Details can be found at http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#faq-spam
Likey you didn't configure
Jaime,
btw: any special reason you plan to use SA 2.64 with local tests only?
I'd recommend upgrading to the latest and greatest stable version which
can be found (as RPMs for SLES9 on Intel) at
http://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/choeger/spamassassin/i386/sles9/
Take care as the config requires
You can turn off auto-expiry and set up a cron job to do it every so
often.
I have try, i will edit local.cf and setup /bayes_auto_expire/ to 0. It's
correct?
Thanks a lot,
Clóvis
Yes, and here is a sample cron job:
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/bayes-maint.txt
Also, you can simply
Jaime Aguado wrote:
Hi all, I have spamassassin 2.64 running on a SuSE Enterprise 9 running
postfix as smtpd.
My spamassassin system is leaking most spam messages (60-80%) without
tagging them.
I have done some configuration tests:
# spamassassin --lint gives no output error.
#
dear spamassassin list,
this question regards using SA via sun's JES which has a spamassassin
library, but any ideas from this list would be appreciated:
here's how spam looks in my spam folder from sun's uwc (imap/http
webmail client):
[SPAM detected True ; 25.0 / 5.0] The Ultimate Online
dear spamassassin list,
this question regards using SA via sun's JES which has a spamassassin
library, but any ideas from this list would be appreciated:
here's how spam looks in my spam folder from sun's uwc (imap/http
webmail client):
[SPAM detected True ; 25.0 / 5.0] The Ultimate Online
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dear spamassassin list,
this question regards using SA via sun's JES which has a spamassassin
library, but any ideas from this list would be appreciated:
here's how spam looks in my spam folder from sun's uwc (imap/http
webmail client):
[SPAM detected True ; 25.0 /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7.1 [SPAM detected True ; 9.2 / 5.0] Report For Traders
...
spamfilter_string_action=data:,require [fileinto]; fileinto
SPAM;[addheader ];addtag [SPAM detected $U];addheader
X-Spam-Level: $U;
An uneducated guess...
Perhaps there's another addtag later on in your
http://rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_stocks.cf
Is the latest addition to the SARE rule sets.
-Doc (SARE Ninja)
Actually I'd suspect it was amavis doing the rewriting. I understand
it simply uses SA as a score mechanism and discards its markups unless
you tell it otherwise somehow.
Either way it's not an SA issue so you can expect confusion here.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Jaime Aguado
Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2006 00:52 schrieb Gary V:
The only configurable header field is the X-Virus-Scanned
($X_HEADER_TAG, $X_HEADER_LINE), other are not configurable,
I found a workaround to find out which machine wrote the X-Spam-Status. I use
different values for sa_tag_level_deflt
Al
I just wanted to
take a few moments to update everyone here on my trials and tribulations on
getting SA to work using Exim 4.60 or several previous versions. As I
wrote in my lastemail, and just to give a quick refresher, I have had
problems successfully running SA 3.1.0 and Exim 4.60
How much diskspace do you need for your database and how many users do
you have?
Bye,
Aiko
--
Aiko Barz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.haeckser.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This is a new one for me. Today I've received some mail with hey john in
the subject, and the mail otherwise appears blank. It didn't contain a
virus, or it would've been discarded by ClamAV.
Are these familiar to you guys? What's the point of them? Headers of one
below: Thanks! - John
This is a new one for me. Today I've received some mail with hey john
in the subject, and the mail otherwise appears blank. It didn't contain a
virus, or it would've been discarded by ClamAV.
Are these familiar to you guys? What's the point of them? Headers of one
below: Thanks! - John
John Fleming wrote:
This is a new one for me. Today I've received some mail with hey john
in the subject, and the mail otherwise appears blank. It didn't contain
a virus, or it would've been discarded by ClamAV.
Are these familiar to you guys? What's the point of them? Headers of
one
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 17:13 -0800, Kelson wrote:
John Fleming wrote:
This is a new one for me. Today I've received some mail with hey john
in the subject, and the mail otherwise appears blank. It didn't contain
a virus, or it would've been discarded by ClamAV.
Are these familiar to
From: John Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a new one for me. Today I've received some mail with hey john in
the subject, and the mail otherwise appears blank. It didn't contain a
virus, or it would've been discarded by ClamAV.
Are these familiar to you guys? What's the point of them?
Funny . I am reading thid and then I get one with the. Subject Hey mdm.
Spooky
Regards,
Michael Di Martino
Director of MIS
The telx Group
Office: 212 480 3300 X.2022
Cell: 646 207 6603
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
-Original
I am using SA 3.0.4. Not sure why these errors are occuring,
# spamassassin --lint
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: P_6_ALPH_L +
__GAP_7_ALPH_L + __GAP_8_ALPH_L + __GAP_9_ALPH_L + __GAP_10_ALPH_L = 5)
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: P_6_ALPH_R +
28 matches
Mail list logo
