> The problem is, Daryl...there's a handful of users that get a certain type
> of spam that DOESN'T process in the usual timeframe. In fact, even on a
> spamassassin restart, those messages come right back in, and eat a process
> space and NEVER finish. Presumably they also consume CPU time and
>
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Mar 30 21:52:14 quark spamd[45835]: __alarm__
Mar 30 21:52:14 quark spamd[45835]: __alarm__
Mar 30 21:52:14 quark spamd[45835]: sp
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Mar 30 21:52:14 quark spamd[45835]: __alarm__
Mar 30 21:52:14 quark spamd[45835]: __alarm__
Mar 30 21:52:14 quark spamd[45835]: spamd: copy_config timeout (with
empty $@), respa
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
Hey, if anyone is around RIGHT NOW, I'm getting the issue, it's
repeatable, and I can't figure out strace...I'm trying strace -o
/home/danm/strace.log -f -ttt /usr/local/bin/spamd -D -u spamd -i -A
72.9.101.130,65.125.237.232,65.125.228.130,127.0.0.1 -q
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:04:24PM +0200, Christoph Petersen wrote:
> I've wondered when the new spamassassin release will be in the debian apt
> repository.
> Does anyone know anything about it?
Put simply: when I get around to it. Sorry. School ends next Friday,
so maybe next weekend?
I'm reall
Heute (02.04.2006/01:45 Uhr) schrieb Jim Knuth,
> Heute (02.04.2006/00:36 Uhr) schrieb Theo Van Dinter,
>> On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:00:24PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
>>> >> ~# sa-update
>>> >> sa-update: importing default keyring to
>>> >> '/etc/mail/spamassassin//sa-update-keys'...
>>> >> confi
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 01:45:38AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Yes, the update was ok. Thank you. But no files changed. Is that
> ok?
What do you mean? The files under /var/lib/spamassassin should have
updated. If not, run with -D and see what's going on.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
* * * <-
Heute (02.04.2006/00:36 Uhr) schrieb Theo Van Dinter,
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:00:24PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
>> >> ~# sa-update
>> >> sa-update: importing default keyring to
>> >> '/etc/mail/spamassassin//sa-update-keys'...
>> >> config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule SPF
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:00:24PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> >> ~# sa-update
> >> sa-update: importing default keyring to
> >> '/etc/mail/spamassassin//sa-update-keys'...
> >> config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule SPF_HELO_PASS
> >> config: warning: description exists for non-e
From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
I'm not sure if this on was a "legitimate" spam or if it was a troll from
someone that didn't like this company...
Loren
...
They look like a quite legitimate company, but a little sloppy
(check out the registration for cyberservicesllc.c
You will want to add SARE for better results and switch on BAYES. Also,
choosing a content scanner like spamassassin or competing products is only
a small part of building an anti-spam/anti-malware server. I have found
that the best combination is greylisting, access lists/certain RBLs at
MTA,
...
>I'm not sure if this on was a "legitimate" spam or if it was a troll from
>someone that didn't like this company...
>
>Loren
...
They look like a quite legitimate company, but a little sloppy
(check out the registration for cyberservicesllc.com - which is them
also). They app
Heute (01.04.2006/05:48 Uhr) schrieb Theo Van Dinter,
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:56:28PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
>> ~# sa-update
>> sa-update: importing default keyring to
>> '/etc/mail/spamassassin//sa-update-keys'...
>> config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule SPF_HELO_PASS
>
Hi,
I've wondered when the new spamassassin release will be in the debian apt
repository.
Does anyone know anything about it?
Regards
Christoph
Loren Wilton wrote:
I'm not sure if this on was a "legitimate" spam or if it was a troll from
someone that didn't like this company...
They apparently got enough complaints to change their web page...
I'm not sure if this on was a "legitimate" spam or if it was a troll from
someone that didn't like this company...
Loren
Status: U
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from proxy08.pacific.net.th ([61.47.124.81])
by mx-mastin.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP
16 matches
Mail list logo
