On Sunday 23 July 2006 16:53, Marc Perkel wrote:
> . SPF is useless because few are using it due to the fact
> that it just doesn't work.
And how would your project fair under those evaluation rules?
Actually I find SPF starting to be used by some of my
banks.
--
_
It *could* be an interesting project, but how long does an IP remain
blacklisted?
The other problem is that although you may think the whitelist is where
the accuracy is going to be there will be plenty of clueless sysadmins
who will blindly block based on the blacklist regardless of how accurate
John Andersen wrote:
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:25, Brent Kennedy wrote:
But based on its current setup, spammers who probably
read this list, will most likely just feed good feedback about their mail
servers through those servers and corrupt the data.
And spammers alre
From: "Igor Chudov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 03:33:03PM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote:
I started receiving a lot of spam in my mailbox. That spam regards one
of the most frequently spammed mede cations, with its name somewhat
misspelled in the Subject:. I am afraid that perhaps so
From: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Obantec Support wrote:
> /etc/mail/spamassassin exists and is chown root.root and chmod 755
>
> bayes dir is chown root.root and chmod 770
And SpamAssassin is running as what user? Can you "
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
In the error logs, I see a lot of errors like this:
Jul 9 12:38:03 robin spamd[10366]: prefork: sysread(9) not ready,
wait max 300 secs
Jul 9 12:38:09 robin spamd[10388]: prefork: periodic ping from spamd
parent
Jul 9 12:38:09 robin spamd[10388]: prefork: sysread(9) no
From: "Kjetil Kjernsmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sunday 23 July 2006 00:52, jdow wrote:
We still need to know how SpamAssassin is invoked. Could you give an
anatomical description of your "mail goes in here and comes out
there" message digestion process with each tool that gets invoked
along the
On Sunday 23 July 2006 12:39, Igor Chudov wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 03:33:03PM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote:
> > I started receiving a lot of spam in my mailbox. That spam regards one
> > of the most frequently spammed mede cations, with its name somewhat
> > misspelled in the Subject:. I am afr
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 10:44:29PM +0200, Christian Schade wrote:
> > Assuming the updates.spamassassin.org (default) channel ...
>
> Are there any other (usefull) channels beside the default jet?
We have a jet? Cool! :P
I can't speak for anyone else out there, but from the ASF SpamAssassin
pro
On Sunday 23 July 2006 3:11 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 02:46:07PM -0500, Chris wrote:
> > This may have been answered, I didn't read through all the messages in
> > the archives. Generally, how often should sa-update be run?
>
> This is really up to you and what channels
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 03:33:03PM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I started receiving a lot of spam in my mailbox. That spam regards one
> of the most frequently spammed mede cations, with its name somewhat
> misspelled in the Subject:. I am afraid that perhaps some of my rules
> stopped working (lik
I started receiving a lot of spam in my mailbox. That spam regards one
of the most frequently spammed mede cations, with its name somewhat
misspelled in the Subject:. I am afraid that perhaps some of my rules
stopped working (like network identification of open spam relays).
It is strange. Anyone
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 02:46:07PM -0500, Chris wrote:
> This may have been answered, I didn't read through all the messages in the
> archives. Generally, how often should sa-update be run?
This is really up to you and what channels you're using.
Assuming the updates.spamassassin.org (default)
This may have been answered, I didn't read through all the messages in the
archives. Generally, how often should sa-update be run?
--
Chris
14:45:00 up 13 days, 12:49, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.15, 0.24
pgp3d4WPQAV62.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:25, Brent Kennedy wrote:
> But based on its current setup, spammers who probably
> read this list, will most likely just feed good feedback about their mail
> servers through those servers and corrupt the data.
And spammers already sign up with every isp they can find and
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: bayes sitewide
Hi
just changing the bayes line to
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes
worked as i no longer see an error on restart and can see bayes files
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 11:41:44AM +0100, Obantec Support wrote:
> bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
> to local.cf and restarted spamd
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes" is
> not valid for "bayes_path", skipping: bayes_path
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/bay
This wasn't detected as a redirector attack by 3.1.3, running
sa-update weekly:
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-DCC: _DCCB_: _DCCR_
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on ga.impsec.org
X-Spam-Level:
- Original Message -
From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: bayes sitewide
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Obantec Support wrote:
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin exists and is chown root.root and chmod 755
> >
> > bayes dir is chown root.root and
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Obantec Support wrote:
/etc/mail/spamassassin exists and is chown root.root and chmod 755
bayes dir is chown root.root and chmod 770
And SpamAssassin is running as what user? Can you "su" to
that user and then cd to that directory, and read and write
files there?
- Log
Brent Kennedy wrote:
I like the idea.. But based on its current setup, spammers who probably
read this list, will most likely just feed good feedback about their mail
servers through those servers and corrupt the data. You would need to have
some sort of login and a way to track what was put
I like the idea.. But based on its current setup, spammers who probably
read this list, will most likely just feed good feedback about their mail
servers through those servers and corrupt the data. You would need to have
some sort of login and a way to track what was put in the database so if you
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 12:27 PM
Subject: RE: bayes sitewide
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2
> -Original Message-
> From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 6:42 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: bayes sitewide
>
>
> Hi
>
> i added the lines
> bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
> bayes_file_mode 0770
>
> to local.cf and
Hi
i added the lines
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0770
to local.cf and restarted spamd
maillog shows
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes" is
not valid for "bayes_path", skipping: bayes_path
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error
thanks for the link http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates it
helped a bit.
how often should i run sa-update? is it something i should s
On Sunday 23 July 2006 00:52, jdow wrote:
> We still need to know how SpamAssassin is invoked. Could you give an
> anatomical description of your "mail goes in here and comes out
> there" message digestion process with each tool that gets invoked
> along the way at least named?
Yup, all that was i
27 matches
Mail list logo
