Hi ALL
does spamassassin work on qmail MTA
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
At 10:40 AM 7/28/2006, you wrote:
Enable network tests. URIBL rules were basically invented for this
type of spam, and they tend to work quite well.
It looks like I'm not, but I'm not able to see how to - I use
spamassassin on a os/x box. I call spamc from procmail
spamc -s 512000
All goog
On Friday 28 July 2006 10:33, Joe Harvell wrote:
> I have Postfix 2.2.10 and SpamAssassin 3.1.3. I have been trying to
> figure out how to set up per-user Bayesian filtering. Obviously I need
> to cause sa-learn to maintain a different database for each user. My
> question is how do I get SpamAs
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quoth Theo:
Why? us.tt acts as a registrar (www.us.tt -> joynic.com), dolling out
.us.tt to others, so we want to be able to deal with that.
Same as other .tt 2TLDs.
Quoth the Trinidad Tobago registrar, ttnic at http://www.nic.tt/ :
===8<--- (Reform
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maurice Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
> SA will only see us.MUN
From: "Maurice Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
> SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you thin
From: "Maurice Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
> SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you thin
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 04:08:42PM -0700, jdow wrote:
> And after my playing around with whois one comes to the confusion or
> conclusion that us.it is not a two level domain or else whois is very
> broken. I vote for the former conclusion. If you play with the standard
> spammer trick .us.it it co
From: "Maurice Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
> SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you thin
From: "Yet Another Ninja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/28/2006 4:57 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think that. us
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FWIW, BAYES_50 actually has a tiny tiny non-zero score so it'll show up as a
rule hit. Otherwise, people went crazy not understanding why there were no
BAYES_* hits.
Gee, I can take out my BAYES_50 tweak.
{^_-}
Visit the wiki for information on changing scores and how the four score
numbers are used. http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
You can learn about the specific BAYES_ scores in this file:
/usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf
Do not change the scores there.
The four scores listed are used under
On Fri, July 28, 2006 19:28, Evan Platt wrote:
> I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI,
> then about 2 more lines.
>
> I've put a sample at http://www.espphotography.com/spam.txt . But
> that's about what they generally are. Very short, to the point so to speak.
>
> Any
The bayesian filter seems super-delicate. If I run sa-learn on a
mailbox with more than about 200 messages in it, it gets killed, I'm
not sure why:
$ sa-learn --spam --dir Maildir/.spam/cur/
Killed
$
If sa-learn gets killed in the middle, it leaves a database that it
thinks is empty.
Before a k
From: "Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for your help, Theo Van Dinter!
Using your tip, I was able to find this on a web site here:
http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/htdocs/Mail-SpamAssassin/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/RegistrarBoundaries.pm.html
(which I post in cause someone in
From: "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, July 28, 2006 13:14, Ramprasad wrote:
From: Rory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Barbra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I write a ruleset to hit these froms
yes
attached a rule for this
I think he meant the "cardiac.cardiac" and "adjudge.ad
Ben Wylie wrote:
> IS there a way to stop all trusted being triggered when no received
> headers are found at all?
>
> Thanks
> Ben
>
>
That should not happen in recent versions of SA.. What version are you on?
SA 3.1.x will only fire ALL_TRUSTED if all of the following are met:
1) there is a
I just realized the question also applies to outgoing mail. Would that
be based on the senders DB? What about for relayed mail? Is there a
way to make it so that SA only gets invoked for incoming mail?
Joe Harvell wrote:
> I have Postfix 2.2.10 and SpamAssassin 3.1.3. I have been trying to
> f
I have Postfix 2.2.10 and SpamAssassin 3.1.3. I have been trying to
figure out how to set up per-user Bayesian filtering. Obviously I need
to cause sa-learn to maintain a different database for each user. My
question is how do I get SpamAssassin to use the DB corresponding to the
recipient of th
On 27-Jul-06, at 7:46 PM, Tao Lin wrote:
Hi, John
Now I understand what MIME_BOUND_RKFINDY mean. It means my email is
generated by Indy component. And I have some misuse of the Indy
component that it gen the html email is not so clean. Once I fix it,
my email score from 2.4 downto 0.5!
A
Evan Platt wrote:
I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI, then
about 2 more lines.
...
Any rules that would help these?
Enable network tests. URIBL rules were basically invented for this type
of spam, and they tend to work quite well.
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate
I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI,
then about 2 more lines.
I've put a sample at http://www.espphotography.com/spam.txt . But
that's about what they generally are. Very short, to the point so to speak.
Any rules that would help these?
Thanks.
Evan
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:21:11AM -0700, Ninja Dude wrote:
> In other words, Bayes looks at it, says, "I have no idea whether this is
> spam-like or not." So 0 is the appropriate score for BAYES_50.
FWIW, BAYES_50 actually has a tiny tiny non-zero score so it'll show up as a
rule hit. Otherwis
Golden, James wrote:
I have several SPAM messages that are trigerring
Bayes_50 but are getting a score of 0.00.
BAYES_50 means Bayes thinks the message has a 50% chance of being spam.
Which is the same as a 50% chance of being ham.
In other words, Bayes looks at it, says, "I have no idea wh
Thanks for your help, Theo Van Dinter!
Using your tip, I was able to find this on a web site here:
http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/htdocs/Mail-SpamAssassin/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/RegistrarBoundaries.pm.html
(which I post in cause someone in the future stumbles upon this thread looking
for this same an
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:27:09AM -0400, Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
> I wasn't involved in that URIBL listing which brought this up... but, BTW,
> I'd love to have that "two level TLD in SA" list handy. Therefore, can
> someone point me in the right direction for where I could find SA
>> ... us.tt is listed as a two level TLD in SA
I wasn't involved in that URIBL listing which brought this up... but, BTW, I'd
love to have that "two level TLD in SA" list handy. Therefore, can someone
point me in the right direction for where I could find SA's list of "two level
TLDs"?
Thanks
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> > I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
> > SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
>
> I'm not sure why you think that. us.tt is listed as a two le
On 7/28/2006 4:57 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think that. us.tt is listed as a two level TLD in
SA, so .us.t
Oops they were single from headers , but from different mails
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 16:50 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, July 28, 2006 13:14, Ramprasad wrote:
> > From: Rory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: Barbra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Can I write a ruleset to hit these fro
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
> SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think that. us.tt is listed as a two level TLD in
SA, so .us.tt is what gets used.
--
Randomly Generated
On Fri, July 28, 2006 13:14, Ramprasad wrote:
> From: Rory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Barbra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Can I write a ruleset to hit these froms
yes
attached a rule for this
--
Benny# > header TWO_SUBJS ALL =~ /(?:^|\n)Subject:.*\nSubject:/s
# > header DOUBLE_SUBJ
Excuse my ignorance, but I have seen mention of raising scores for Bayes_99, Bayes_95, and I have several SPAM messages that are trigerring Bayes_50 but are getting a score of 0.00. What are the differences between these and how do I go about raising the scores? I can't seem to find any docum
On Fri, July 28, 2006 13:56, Ben Wylie wrote:
> IS there a way to stop all trusted being triggered when no received
> headers are found at all?
that will be brokken if that happens, your own mta should be there no matter
how brokken the sending client is
what you can do is trust less to avoid it,
Tried that, and it didn't work. Even with file permissions set to 777, I
was seeing these log entries:
Jul 25 12:36:10 vps spamd[28501]: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp
lockfile /.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.vps.zinski.net.28501 for
/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: Permission denied
IS there a way to stop all trusted being triggered when no received
headers are found at all?
Thanks
Ben
Hi!
All spams advertising stocks of HLUN.PK Am I alone facing this problem.
Also I found that the From header in all mails is a typical repeated
string
No this is seen all over.
Anyone a nice rule?
Bye,
Raymond.
I am suddenly facing a lot of image spams from a pretty effiecient
spammer now . The Ips he is using are not listed anywhere
All spams advertising stocks of HLUN.PK Am I alone facing this problem.
Also I found that the From header in all mails is a typical repeated
string
Like these
From: Ro
BG Mahesh wrote:
hi
We are moving our mailserver to a new machine. The old machine has
MailScanner+SA 2.6.x
The new machine has MailScanner+SA 3.1.4
How can I move the bayes file from the old machine to the new machine
and make sure it is SA 3.1.4 complaint?
Basically I want the new machine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gino Cerullo wrote:
>
> On 27-Jul-06, at 4:32 PM, Hamish wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 17:25, Marc Perkel wrote:
>>> Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, July 25, 2006 18:51, Marc Perkel wrote:
> SPF breaks email forwarding. My users use forw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Hamish wrote:
>
>> Forwarding should (IMO) be implemented in such a way as the
>> FORWARDING mailbox should be used as the new return-path (Just
>> like if you forwarded an email from your MUA rather than wi
Hello,
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I know there are some domains which use a 2 level tld zone. like .co.uk
which will never be included.
Is this not an TLD which has be to changed inside SA to a 2 level tld?
If I check the
42 matches
Mail list logo