At 10:40 AM 7/28/2006, you wrote:
Enable network tests. URIBL rules were basically invented for this
type of spam, and they tend to work quite well.
It looks like I'm not, but I'm not able to see how to - I use
spamassassin on a os/x box. I call spamc from procmail
spamc -s 512000
All
Hi ALL
does spamassassin workon qmail MTA
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
On Saturday 29 July 2006 08:48, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
does spamassassin work on qmail MTA
Yes. Also, you might want to look into using the qpsmtpd component, as
it gives you a lot of power over the SMTP dialogue:
http://smtpd.develooper.com/
Best,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer /
It looks like the process is getting killed from an external signal.
Maybe this is the Linux OOM killer in action? What is the memory/swap
status of this machine? Have you tried running sa-learn with the -D
option?
Leander
On 29-jul-2006, at 0:31, Steven Scotten wrote:
The bayesian filter
Or perhaps there is some other form of resource control in place.
What's the output of ulimit -a?
Leander
On 29-jul-2006, at 14:22, Leander Koornneef wrote:
It looks like the process is getting killed from an external signal.
Maybe this is the Linux OOM killer in action? What is the
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
On Saturday 29 July 2006 08:48, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
does spamassassin work on qmail MTA
Yes. Also, you might want to look into using the qpsmtpd component, as
it gives you a lot of power over the SMTP dialogue:
http://smtpd.develooper.com/
You might also want
From: Rory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Barbra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something like
header FROMFROM=~ /[A-Z]\w+ \[mailto\: \w+\.\w+\@/
There is a way to be more specific, but it costs considerably more. I'd try
this first.
Loren
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:03:12PM -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
On a similiar note: I added
urirhssub URIBL_BLACK multi.uribl.com.A 2
urirhssub URIBL_GREY multi.uribl.com.A 4
Any ideas?
Any reason you don't just use sa-update which has the uribl.com folks
Does DCC, RAZOR, PYZOR, or any other signature algorithms work with
the image spams? It's not apparent from reading the man pages. It
seems to me that one could compare the signatures of attachments instead
of the whole e-mail and provide additional detection.
Thanks,
Tim
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:
From: Rory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Barbra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something like
header FROMFROM=~ /[A-Z]\w+ \[mailto\: \w+\.\w+\@/
There is a way to be more specific, but it costs considerably
more.
Namely:
header
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
header FROMFROM=~ /[A-Z]\w+ \[mailto\: \w+\.\w+\@/
It won't work. [A-Z] without the case-insensitive flag won't match
the samples provided.
Whoops! Comment retracted!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
Does DCC, RAZOR, PYZOR, or any other signature algorithms work with
the image spams? It's not apparent from reading the man pages. It
seems to me that one could compare the signatures of attachments instead
of the whole e-mail and provide additional detection.
Thanks,
Tim
Hi Tim,
it
On Saturday 29 July 2006 10:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does DCC, RAZOR, PYZOR, or any other signature algorithms work with
the image spams? It's not apparent from reading the man pages. It
seems to me that one could compare the signatures of attachments instead
of the whole e-mail and
13 matches
Mail list logo
