Robert Nicholson wrote:
So,
I'm looking at mail being sent to my domain and it's overwhelmingly mail
people who don't exist at my domain.
I'd rather this was trapped before my qmail script executed. every one
of these mails is forking the perl interpreter and executing my perl
script
So,
I'm looking at mail being sent to my domain and it's overwhelmingly
mail people who don't exist at my domain.
examples
165(new):From: "Wilford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
166(new): To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
167(new): Subject: Enjoy the newest Every man wants it Be delighted with
174(new)
On Monday 18 September 2006 8:13 am, Sietse van Zanen wrote:
> Probably the writers of the module have decided to use strict references
> in their programming.
>
> You can do 1 of 2 things:
> 1. donwgrade back to 0.53.
> 2. edit the perl source for the new module and disable strict references.
> Th
On Mon, September 18, 2006 08:36, Ramprasad wrote:
> We scan a huge number of mails ( upto 150k an hour ) on our load
> balanced array of servers.
bigger is better :-)
> I was thinking of running a local fingerprinting server like pyzord
yes pyzord is working, its just setup one and publish th
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:43:33PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Can anyone shed any light on what happens to the SA rulesets eg. all
> > the files in the /usr/share/spamassassin directory when one does an
> > upgrade from say the 2.64 version to the latest 3.15 version ?
> They are removed and r
John Goubeaux wrote:
> Can anyone shed any light on what happens to the SA rulesets eg. all
> the files in the /usr/share/spamassassin directory when one does an
> upgrade from say the 2.64 version to the latest 3.15 version ?
They are removed and replace with the files from the new version.
This
Can anyone shed any light on what happens to the SA rulesets eg. all
the files in the /usr/share/spamassassin directory when one does an
upgrade from say the 2.64 version to the latest 3.15 version ?
Likewise, I assume that I CAN upgrade directly from this earlier
version to the latest releas
Hi again,
seems that sa-exim somehow lets SA run as user Debian-exim. One of the files
(don't exactly remeber
which one) had root ownership. I changed that and I will check tomorrow,
when another dozen of
spam as run through.
CU Carsten.
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
>
> Check if the user you are r
From: "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi all...
using qmail/vpopmail.
so far users have individual .spamassassin under their vpopmail
directories using mailfilter to pipe incoming mail trough spamd for each
user. this apparently has the disadvantage of not being able to run per
user sa-lea
> now i wait to dkim commes on gentoo
Btw, dkim-milter 0.5.2 just came out
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/
It fixes:
- compatibility with Postfix milter environment;
- verifies that the body hash in a signature matches the actual body hash;
- fixes "relaxed" body canonicalization o
Thanks for the hint. The daemon runs as root. But as SA is run through
sa-exim, I am not so sure who
will try to r/w those files. As a test, I tried to set all the files to 666,
but I will further investigate on that.
Carsten.
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
>
> Check if the user you are running spa
I'm running Spamassassin 3.1.4, spamass-milter 0.3.1, sendmail 8.13.8 (all from the Blastwave builds) on a Sun 220R running Solaris 9. I upgraded to the very latest versions last Tuesday. On Wednesday I saw some "451
4.3.2 Please try again later" messages, gradually increasing until now I am get
hi experts,
i need some help with qmail + spamassassin. I have a qmail + spamassassin
and when i try to send an emal it neves get to destination. Now I look im my
maillog it shows me:
Sep 18 11:38:23 profactory spamd[7211]: handle_user: unable to find user
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'!
Sep 18 11:38:23 pro
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 05:48:35PM +0200, Stéphane LEPREVOST wrote:
> I'm surprised that nobody seems to complain for problems with auto-whitelist
> file growing. Of course, it may be only a question of free time to do this
> (I understand SO much these problems...) but does someone knows if someon
Hi,
A little
question about AutoWhitelistExpiry : does someone knows why this feature has
never been coded ? It seems like Dallas Engelken once made a patch for this
in 2004 but only for SQL DB's...
I'm
surprised that nobody seems to complain for problems with auto-whitelist file
growin
Check if the user you are running spamassassin under has r/w access to the files in /var/spool/exim4/.spamassassin/bayes
It is also best if you run spamd with option '-u user' if you have a side wide bayes. Otherwise all your local users + the user nobody need r/w access.
-Sietse
From: Car
Hi,
I have autlearn enabled and configured for auto-expire:
use_bayes 1
bayes_path /var/spool/exim4/.spamassassin/bayes
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 5.0
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -1.5
bayes_min_ham_num 100
bayes_min_spam_num 100
bayes_auto_expire 1
bayes_journal_ma
Mike Pepe wrote:
> Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have
> an inkling as to what I could do.
>
> Some mail servers are now rejecting my email:
>
> (reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname must contain a dot.)
>
> I checked and sure enough, the HELO ju
Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have
an inkling as to what I could do.
Some mail servers are now rejecting my email:
(reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname must contain a dot.)
I checked and sure enough, the HELO just spits out the hostname, not
Probably the writers of the module have decided to use strict references in their programming.
You can do 1 of 2 things:
1. donwgrade back to 0.53.
2. edit the perl source for the new module and disable strict references. There should be a line that says 'use strict;'. Add a line 'no strict '
On Sun, September 17, 2006 21:48, SM wrote:
> At 04:32 17-09-2006, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> how does one do signing multible domains ?
>> man 8 dk-filter says to make a internal domain file and add this as -i
>> internal.file
> You can use the -d parameter ( -d example.com,example.net) or
thank
hi all...
using qmail/vpopmail.
so far users have individual .spamassassin under their vpopmail
directories using mailfilter to pipe incoming mail trough spamd for each
user. this apparently has the disadvantage of not being able to run per
user sa-learn. and not all users have the mailfilter i
22 matches
Mail list logo
