3.1.7. Skip 6.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Lake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 20:14
Subject: Should I upgrade to 3.1.6?
Just looked over the bug fix list for 3.1.6 and it doesn't seem
like anything *major* that would suggest that I shou
It's a few lines of perl. Download it. Put the pieces in the appropriate
places. Go.
(The direct answer is "of course not." It's still beta and nobody has
done rpms, debs, or ports of it. There might now be a zip or tar file
of it.)
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Lake" <[EMAIL
>
> Just looked over the bug fix list for 3.1.6 and it doesn't seem
> like anything *major* that would suggest that I should make the leap. I'm
> right now running 3.1.5 on my box. Is there other improvements, such as
> rules and the like, that would make this a preferable upgrade? Or
Just looked over the bug fix list for 3.1.6 and it doesn't seem
like anything *major* that would suggest that I should make the leap. I'm
right now running 3.1.5 on my box. Is there other improvements, such as
rules and the like, that would make this a preferable upgrade? Or should I
Oh, this sounds spectacular. One question. Is there a port on
Freebsd for this? I don't see one offhand. If there is, then that would
assume that all the other necessary ports are present as well. If not,
it'll be a royal b trying to get the nix versions installed instead if
no
From: "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, October 14, 2006 19:52, Michael Scheidell wrote:
you could increase the score for
DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX :-)
this is just plain easy to reject from postfix cidr: mapping :-)
rule of thumps, dont accept mail of you cannot bounce it back
Yu
From: "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, October 14, 2006 14:33, Suhas \(QualiSpace\) wrote:
Which rule will help me in checking if senders domain has MX
record or not. E.g I am getting email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], then the rule
should check whether domain.com has an MX record or not
There are a number of options. Volatile and backports are probably the
safest. Braver souls can run unstable or testing (if they know how to
install it without bringing planet earth along with it). And others may
choose to completely remove the Debian package and install it from source or
CPAN.
> -Original Message-
> From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 2:18 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: senders domain has MX or not?
>
>
>
> On Sat, October 14, 2006 19:52, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > you could increase the s
On Sat, October 14, 2006 20:01, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>> clear_internal_networks
>> internal_networks 127.0.0.0/8
>> clear_trusted_networks
>> trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8
>> trusted_networks
> This is incorrect.
i forgot why i did it :/
> internal_networks *must* include the IPs of your ow
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, October 14, 2006 12:18, Suhas \(QualiSpace\) wrote:
How to disable ALL_TRUSTED ?
no
local.cf:
clear_internal_networks
internal_networks 127.0.0.0/8
clear_trusted_networks
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8
trusted_networks
This is incorrect. internal_networks *mu
On Sat, October 14, 2006 19:52, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> you could increase the score for
> DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX :-)
this is just plain easy to reject from postfix cidr: mapping :-)
rule of thumps, dont accept mail of you cannot bounce it back
--
"This message was sent using 100% recycled sp
On 14-okt-2006, at 19:33, Bob Proulx wrote:
Chris Purves wrote:
You can also get newer versions of spamassassin from
debian-volatile, which maintains packages that update often (such as
spamassassin, antivirus, etc). You would need to add the following
to your sources.list (although y
Title: Message
you
could increase the score for
DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX :-)
Chris Purves wrote:
> You can also get newer versions of spamassassin from
> debian-volatile, which maintains packages that update often (such as
> spamassassin, antivirus, etc). You would need to add the following
> to your sources.list (although you'll probably want a closer mirror
> http://www.
On October 13, 2006 06:42 am, Bart Veltman wrote:
> Currently I am using spamassassin version 3.0.3 on a Debian 3.1 sarge
> (stable release) linux system. According to Debian this version is
> stable but is more than a year old. Which version should I use, or must
> I use, to maintain a stable envi
Which rule will help me in checking if senders domain has MX record or not.
E.g I am getting email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], then the rule should check
whether domain.com has an MX record or not.
I think this should be a question on your mail daemon. Not spamassassin.
On Sat, October 14, 2006 14:33, Suhas \(QualiSpace\) wrote:
> Which rule will help me in checking if senders domain has MX
> record or not. E.g I am getting email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], then the rule
> should check whether domain.com has an MX record or not.
its not a fail if a domain have no mx
Hello,
Which rule will help me in checking if senders
domain has MX record or not. E.g I am getting email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], then the rule should check
whether domain.com has an MX record or not.
Warm Regards,
Suhas
System Administrator
QualiSpace - A
QuantumPa
On Sat, October 14, 2006 12:18, Suhas \(QualiSpace\) wrote:
> How to disable ALL_TRUSTED ?
no
local.cf:
clear_internal_networks
internal_networks 127.0.0.0/8
clear_trusted_networks
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8
trusted_networks
# and below here i add all trusted forwarding ips
trusted_network
You don't. Look it up on the wiki pages.
If you do not set up SpamAssassin trust relationships properly then
none of the DNS rules will work for you.
Note that trust in this sense is NOT, repeat NOT, trust that a given
MTA will never deliver spam to you. It IS trust that it will never
forge any
On Fri, October 13, 2006 10:11, Suhas \(QualiSpace\) wrote:
> Can anybody explain me why SA did not flagged this message as spam?
> USER_IN_WHITELIST
i bet USER_IN_WHITELIST gives -100 with is one of the problems
2 ways of solve it:
1: put a lower score on so the user is still whitelisted but
How to disable ALL_TRUSTED
?
Warm Regards,
Suhas
System Administrator
QualiSpace - A
QuantumPages Enterprise
===
Tel India:
+91 (22) 6792 - 1480
Tel US:
+1 (614) 827 - 1224
Fax India:
+91 (22) 2530 - 3166
URL: http://www.qualispace.com
=
Anyone aware of BOGUS_ATTACH_SCAN
, how it helps? From where to get it?
I need a rule which will scan zip
attachment and report if it is password protected.
Warm Regards,
Suhas
System Administrator
QualiSpace - A
QuantumPages Enterprise
===
Tel India:
+
From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--On Friday, October 13, 2006 9:23 AM +0100 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Please bear in mind, also, that there are 5 different rules that
use RFCI data, and they have wildly varying accuracies and scores:
SPAM%HAM%S/ORANKSC
25 matches
Mail list logo
