squintr wrote:
> I'm seeing this in every message that goes through SpamAssassin:
>
> Score Matching Rule Description
> cached not
> score=1.451
> 2 required
> -1.80 ALL_TRUSTED
> -2.60 BAYES_00
>
> This is often causing spam that should have a relatively high score to not
> get caug
I'm seeing this in every message that goes through SpamAssassin:
Score Matching Rule Description
cached not
score=1.451
2 required
-1.80 ALL_TRUSTED
-2.60 BAYES_00
This is often causing spam that should have a relatively high score to not
get caught.
I've turned bayes off in my
Gestern (09.01.2007/22:39 Uhr) schrieb Dan Horne,
> Is there now a NetPBM-less-than-10.34 patch for 3.5.1? The changes in
> the patch are rather trivial, really, so it seems like a good thing to
> include in the INSTALL readme rather than distribute a patch, such as:
> NETPBM LESS THAN 10.34
>
Gestern (09.01.2007/22:39 Uhr) schrieb Dan Horne,
> Is there now a NetPBM-less-than-10.34 patch for 3.5.1? The changes in
> the patch are rather trivial, really, so it seems like a good thing to
> include in the INSTALL readme rather than distribute a patch, such as:
> NETPBM LESS THAN 10.34
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Baron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 8:32 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: FuzzyOcr Log Entries
>
> 2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for pamthreshold
> 2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find
> -Original Message-
> From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: FuzzyOcr 3.5.1 released
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
> since 3.5.0 RC1
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >>> User emails from his/her dialup IP directly to trusted_networks server 1
> >>> (which is allowed by access not SMTPAUTH), which then goes to my server.
> >>> It seems this e
> 2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for pamthreshold
> These are listed as helpers to the program. What needs to be
> installed to make use of them and what is their value/advantage.
> FuzzyOcr seems to be working quite well!
I'll piggyback my pamthreshold-related issue on this thr
Bob Pierce wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 15:16 +0100, decoder wrote:
>
>> Now, the version seems stable enough to replace the 3.4.x branch, and
>> I recommend everyone to upgrade to it :)
>
> The FuzzyOcr site still lists 3.5.1 as devel. Should it be considered
> stable enough for production us
Markus Eskola wrote:
[snip]
> Ok, checked that too, and it also looks ok. Gcc can find
> libgcc_s.so.1, but if it didn't, wouldn't I get an error during
> compilation?
No, libgcc is different than libgcc_s.
> I checked mysql.so aswell using ldd and all the depending libraries
> are referenced to
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 15:16 +0100, decoder wrote:
> Now, the version seems stable enough to replace the 3.4.x branch, and
> I recommend everyone to upgrade to it :)
The FuzzyOcr site still lists 3.5.1 as devel. Should it be considered
stable enough for production use yet?
We are still running 2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René Berber skrev:
>>
>>
>>> Is there somehow I can check that all the other files are in place;
>>> libgcc_s.so.1, ld.so.1 and mysql.so (well I know they are there, I
>>> checked, but whether the linking was done to the right files etc)?
>> Yes, `per
Now that you mention it, yes, it had a Geocities URL.
- Original Message -
From: "John Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: "Dear Homeowner" spam
Claude Frantz wrote:
> Hello Folk !
>
> Sometimes I get BAYES_99=3.5 as result of the test, in a message
> coming to me. This message is only sent to me and its contents is not
> SPAM.
>
> How can I find exactly the reason on this erroneous marking ?
The general reason is the message closely matche
David Baron wrote:
> 2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for pamthreshold
> 2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for pamtopnm
> 2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for tesseract
>
> These are listed as helpers to the program. What needs to be
> installed to
2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for pamthreshold
2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for pamtopnm
2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for tesseract
These are listed as helpers to the program. What needs to be installed to make
use of them and what is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Ries wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have running an instace of Spamassassin that crashes every few days...
>
> The last entry in the mail.log was that spamd was scanning a mail and
no error
> was written. The spamd process was running bur no mail was sca
Both of my systems reported:
Subroutine __CTYPE_HTML_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_ratware.cf, rule __CTYPE_HTML,
line 6.
Subroutine __FROM_EBAY_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/80_additional.cf, rule __FROM_EBAY,
line 6.
Subroutine __HAS_RCVD_h
Yup - if you are looking for "within 10 miles" you can perform a raw
comparison by looking at the lat-lon degrees number to remove anything
more than two degrees apart. That knocks down your search by 180 time
in each direction, over 3:1 savings right there. If you store all
the data as degree
Hi,
I recently installed FuzzyOcr (3.5.0-rc1, now 3.5.1) and got it to work
using MailScanner-4.51 and SpamAssassin-3.1.7 and Postfix-2.3.
Since a day or two focr isn't seeing images anymore when parsed via
MailScanner and possibly also the recipient email address seems missing.
(SpamAssassin its
Hi
I have running an instace of Spamassassin that crashes every few days...
The last entry in the mail.log was that spamd was scanning a mail and no error
was written. The spamd process was running bur no mail was scanned for about
one day.
Restarting spamassassin helped but this is no real so
Hello list,
I am not able to unsubscribe from this list. I try several times sent an
empty email with no subject to
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. I get no response from the
list-server.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks a lot.
Alex
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this is a bug with the FAKE_HELO_MSN rule, or if I'm just
overlooking something...
I just received a legitimate email from MSN.com (to verify an email address
for MSN Messenger). The email triggered the FAKE_HELO_MSN rule, but I can't
see why. Here are the 3 Received hea
23 matches
Mail list logo
