"Alexis Manning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Apologies if this is received more than once - apache.org doesn't like my
> local mailserver!]
>
> Does anyone have any data on high-scoring false positives? Currently I
> have my required score set to 7.5.
>
> Under 7.5 gets delivered normally. A
[Apologies if this is received more than once - apache.org doesn't like my
local mailserver!]
Does anyone have any data on high-scoring false positives? Currently I
have my required score set to 7.5.
Under 7.5 gets delivered normally. Anything between 7.5 and 15 gets put
into a folder that I
Gary W. Smith wrote:
Mail::SpamAssassin:Client seems to work but is alpha. Any ideas on the
status of this?
I've been using it for a long time with no problems at all. The
check_spamd Nagios plugin (available in contrib/ in svn) uses it too.
Daryl
-Original Message-
From: Alex Woick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:24 PM
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: Andy Figueroa; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: use or not use awl
Matt Kettler wrote:
> That said, I think the AWL is a great idea, but not ready for
IMO, all AWL needs is an auto expiry systems like bayes has.
For us as a College, AWL makes a HUGE difference when students submit their
thesis, term papers, etc. which at times may be on sexual debauchery, KP,
internet scams etc. With AWL, it sees that all previous messages from this
individaul
Alex Woick wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> That said, I think the AWL is a great idea, but not ready for production
>> use on servers with reasonable mail volume. I say that because it
>> completely lacks any kind of useful (ie: atime based) expiry mechanism.
>> The only way to prune the AWL databa
Matt Kettler wrote:
That said, I think the AWL is a great idea, but not ready for production
use on servers with reasonable mail volume. I say that because it
completely lacks any kind of useful (ie: atime based) expiry mechanism.
The only way to prune the AWL database is by hitcount, using the
c
I have enabled dcc, pyzor, and razor2 and network checks, so I find the
following debug output confusing so I'm unable to tell with any certainty
that I have this optimized the way I want to.
Why does it tell me "dcc: local tests only, disabling DCC" and likewise for
pyzor and razor2? Perhaps
I have enabled dcc, pyzor, and razor2 and network checks, so I find the
following debug output confusing so I'm unable to tell with any
certainty that I have this optimized the way I want to.
Why does it tell me "dcc: local tests only, disabling DCC" and likewise
for pyzor and razor2? Perhaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sander Holthaus wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:59:47AM +0100, Sander Holthaus wrote:
>>> But how do I do this for just one specific language? I use the
>>> TextCat
>> ok_languages nl
>
>>> in _LANGUAGES_, so I want a rul
SA 3.0.3 - Does this log entry just mean Pyzor isn't available, or something
more serious? - John
Jan 20 08:40:51 Luke spamd[18328]: Pyzor -> check failed: Can't fork at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 1017.
Jan 20 08:40:51 Luke spamd[18829]: Pyzor -> check failed: Can't fork a
Gary W. Smith wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I’m working on a perl script that will check some emails. I had a
> question though (based on an earlier question). If SA is on a
> different box how do I tell the perl code to use a different host and
> port?
>
Erm, if you're using Mail::SpamAssassin, you aren
Never mind. I just realized that this module does the full SA
execution.
Mail::SpamAssassin:Client seems to work but is alpha. Any ideas on the
status of this?
Gary Wayne Smith
From: Gary W. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 2
Hello,
I'm working on a perl script that will check some emails. I had a
question though (based on an earlier question). If SA is on a different
box how do I tell the perl code to use a different host and port?
Given something like the code below how do I specific a non-default
backend?
#!/us
14 matches
Mail list logo
