Hello, list.
I would like to ask some about bayes.
If I have recevied ham mail which written ***SPAM***,
So in order to train bayes this mail with sa-learn to ham, I forwarded
this mail using outlook or outlook express to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and this mail
would be saved at /var/spool/mail/ham
Tom wrote:
> How do I stop Spamassassin from scanning email for a particular user
> (email account) on the server.
>
> I have Spamassassin 3.1.7 finally working and would like to send all
> messages identifed as spam to a user on the server
> The problem is now those messages that go to the spam ac
> >> Ideally a milter will fake a return-path header when it fakes the
> >> required received header.
> >
> > For the record, current versions of MIMEDefang do this. I believe
> > someone mentioned that current versions of Amavisd-new also do this.
> > YMMV with older releases and other milters.
>
Tom wrote:
How do I stop Spamassassin from scanning email for a particular user
(email account) on the server.
I have Spamassassin 3.1.7 finally working and would like to send all
messages identifed as spam to a user on the server
The problem is now those messages that go to the spam account g
How do I stop Spamassassin from scanning email for a particular user
(email account) on the server.
I have Spamassassin 3.1.7 finally working and would like to send all
messages identifed as spam to a user on the server
The problem is now those messages that go to the spam account gets rescann
Hello,
Suddenly, i notice huge cpu usage by SA on 3 different servers. nothing
was changed in custom rules or configuration recently. kindly suggest,
what might have been casing this.
Regards
...
Matthew Bickerton wrote:
I am having a problem with the Net::DNS module. It just hangs up when trying
to resolve a domain to get the TXT data for SPF tests in spanassassin. If I
try to reinstall the module it fail the make test. How did you solve the
problem?
Matthew
-Original Message-
Matthew, I never had a problem with a hang. My problem was that it would get
back
incorrect results. It was making ham as spam when it should not have. I was
told to
upgrade Net::DNS it to the latest version. I can only suggest the same to you.
Which version of perl and Net::DNS are you running?
Kelson wrote:
> Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>> Matt Kettler wrote:
>>> But this assumes that your SA is called after the Return-Path header is
>>> added, and not before. If you're using a milter, this won't work,
>>> but if
>>> you're calling from procmail, it will.
>>
>> Ideally a milter will fake a
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Dhaval Patel wrote:
I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed
from the Debian packages.
I had a problem with the Net::DNS module a while back and upgrade
perl to 5.8.8 using
CPAN. This upgrade installed perl 5.8.8 as the default perl version
I've set up Sendmail to send double bounces to /dev/null but I'm still
getting a large about of "Delivery failures" to my spambox, and each one
of them has been scanned by OCR. According to my logs in the last 48
hours I've scanned 1.3 million incoming messages and the server is
seriously bogged d
Martin,
> The MISSING_SUBJECT rule fires on every email, even though they actually
> have a "Subject:" header
If I remember corrently, this effect can be produced by having
syntactically incorrect rules. Make sure to run 'spamassassin --lint'
before starting with modified rules!
Mark
Note that I'm not the author of the original message. If you're going to
cc, you should cc her.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:03:00PM -0500, Jeff Morton wrote:
> Is there a way, then, to cause spamc to learn from an entire folder
> without writing a bash for loop to pipe the files in one at a time?
No. spamc only knows how to deal with single messages. If you want mbox,
mbx, or dir handling,
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
But this assumes that your SA is called after the Return-Path header is
added, and not before. If you're using a milter, this won't work, but if
you're calling from procmail, it will.
Ideally a milter will fake a return-path header when it fakes th
***If you could get your CIO (or top management) to understand one thing,
just ONE thing, about fighting spam, what would it be?***
This sounds too fatalistic, but I have one simple thing I wished people
understood:
You cannot stop all spam, at least not without causing collateral damage
to
I've set up spamassassin so that the bayes files are owned by 'nobody'
and are centrally located, and spamc is used to report spam or ham to
train the filter. I have no problem training the filter by piping a
single file at a time into spamc.
The local.cf file contains:
bayes_path /etc/mail/spa
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:48:18PM -, Martin Gill wrote:
> The MISSING_SUBJECT rule fires on every email, even though they actually
> have a "Subject:" header and spam assassin actually modifies the message
> to add it's SPAM tag.
> Anyone able to explain this to me please? Have I misunderstood
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:30:12PM +, Dan Massey wrote:
> This obviously does not work in its current format, is there a 'continuation
> line' character I can use?
No, rules have to be on one line.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"It's not a huge rocket science thing, but it is a little bit fu
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:51:47AM +0500, Roman Serbski wrote:
>
>> It looks like Razor2 servers are down?
>>
>
> That's the type of question that you'd do much better asking the razor people.
>
>
I agree that's a better place to as. However, I've seen it asked a
Hi,
I've been watching my spam assassin rules for a while and I'm getting a
bit confused with a couple of them.
The MISSING_SUBJECT rule fires on every email, even though they actually
have a "Subject:" header and spam assassin actually modifies the message
to add it's SPAM tag.
Also TO_CC_NONE
Hi List
I have a file of custom rules for spamassassin, but some of the rules have
lots of OR conditions and I would like, for the sake of readability to break
it over several lines in the file, for example
header MYTEST From =~ /(
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
[EMAIL PROTECT
22 matches
Mail list logo
