RE: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread R Lists06
You use sendmail. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=reject+spam+during+sendmail+smtp+sessio n+for+spamassassin+scoring http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DeletingAllMailsMarkedSpam http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedInMta We use qmail, specific qmail patches, ClamAV, Spamassassin

Re: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread John D. Hardin
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, The Doctor wrote: > > You could also set the rule scores absurdly high and then use a more > > standard policy of discarding when the score is high enough. > > > > The definition of "high enough" will vary from person to person, of > > course, based on personal philosophy an

Re: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:04:44PM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, The Doctor wrote: > > > Any recipe recommendations? > > :0 > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*\ > /dev/null > > Vary the rulename-of-death to suit. > > You could also set the rule scores absurdly high and then us

Re: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 01:12:19PM -0700, R Lists06 wrote: > > > > Any recipe recommendations? > > -- > > Doc, > > Score the rule high and reject the email before accepted. It is scored high (>99) and not it is a matter of rejecting using sendmail. > > We do it in some of our installations us

Re: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread John D. Hardin
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, The Doctor wrote: > Any recipe recommendations? :0 * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*\ /dev/null Vary the rulename-of-death to suit. You could also set the rule scores absurdly high and then use a more standard policy of discarding when the score is high enough. The definition

RE: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread R Lists06
> > Any recipe recommendations? > -- Doc, Score the rule high and reject the email before accepted. We do it in some of our installations using a patched older version of qmail-scanner-queue.pl If you need more website references, hit me off list... - rh -- Abba Communications Internet Spok

Re: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread J.
--- The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 08:35:41AM -0700, J. wrote: > > > > --- The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Is there any way to using a ruleset to delete incoming mail > > > found on that ruleset? > > > > This seems to get asked an answered prett

Re: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:59:52PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > The Doctor wrote: > > Is there any way to using a ruleset to delete incoming mail > > found on that ruleset? > > > > > Depends, what are you using to delete your mail? > > Fundamentally, spamassassin itself does not, and in fact ca

Re: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 08:35:41AM -0700, J. wrote: > > --- The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there any way to using a ruleset to delete incoming mail > > found on that ruleset? > > This seems to get asked an answered pretty regularly on this list. > Spamassassin doesn't delete anyt

Re: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread Matt Kettler
The Doctor wrote: > Is there any way to using a ruleset to delete incoming mail > found on that ruleset? > > Depends, what are you using to delete your mail? Fundamentally, spamassassin itself does not, and in fact cannot, delete mail. It's role as a mail filter only grants it the ability to ch

Re: USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread J.
--- The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any way to using a ruleset to delete incoming mail > found on that ruleset? This seems to get asked an answered pretty regularly on this list. Spamassassin doesn't delete anything. You can have another component of your mail system do that for

SA more efficient of client?

2007-04-22 Thread Florian Lindner
Hello, I use SA von my server. The mails are filtered immediatly after they were received. SA uses a number of external services, for example black lists which test if they same email was already received by thousands of other people. Are these tests signifcantly more effectively when being run

Re: sa-learn: have i seen this before?

2007-04-22 Thread Faisal N Jawdat
On Apr 22, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Matt Kettler wrote: You don't have sa-blacklist, do you? no, but i had a whitelist with almost 5,000 entries -faisal

Re: sa-learn: have i seen this before?

2007-04-22 Thread Matt Kettler
Faisal N Jawdat wrote: > On Apr 21, 2007, at 11:49 PM, Matt Kettler wrote: >> Try adding a -D to sa-learn.. if it's lock contention, you should see >> a bunch of messages about it waiting for the lock. > > i did this earlier (after some mucking about with file tracing tools) > and found that most o

USing Botnet.cf to delete all spam incoming

2007-04-22 Thread The Doctor
Is there any way to using a ruleset to delete incoming mail found on that ruleset? -- Member - Liberal International This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED] God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Beware Linux the Microsoft of Unixes!! -- This message has been scanned

Re: sa-learn: have i seen this before?

2007-04-22 Thread Faisal N Jawdat
On Apr 21, 2007, at 11:49 PM, Matt Kettler wrote: Try adding a -D to sa-learn.. if it's lock contention, you should see a bunch of messages about it waiting for the lock. i did this earlier (after some mucking about with file tracing tools) and found that most of the wait seems to be in two