I currently process sa-learn against two mailboxes in each user's
mailspool, sal-ham and sal-spam using a line like this:
/usr/local/bin/sa-learn --spam --mbox -u $i $S_PATH
where $i is the user name and $S_PATH is /home/${i}/Mail/sal-spam
Now, I want to process maildirs that are stored for v
I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How can I
enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the lack
of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up as
"SPAM" in the dnstools spam database checker. I haven't been able to find
a
I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql earlier
today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham < spam.txt (full email headers
too) a few times and those are the only entires in the db, the ones that I
ad
I recently saw this happening when testing. Is this stuff left over from some
older version, or something not installed?
What should I do with the undefined dependencies?
[29724] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined
dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
[29724] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC
I believe it is from --lint, my other snippets are from feeding it a spam.
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
> Peter Pluta wrote:
>> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with Postfix + Amavisd-new + Spamassassin (razor,
>> pyazor) + Clamav. I'm getting some nasty spams, as in 20-30 per day. My
>> email is relatively
Peter Pluta wrote:
> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with Postfix + Amavisd-new + Spamassassin (razor,
> pyazor) + Clamav. I'm getting some nasty spams, as in 20-30 per day. My
> email is relatively new, i'm trying to figure out if razor and pyzor are
> working.
>
> I noticed this in my spamassassin -D ou
Look like it's wokring, odd.
[86465] info: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"/usr/local/etc/mail/sp
amassassin/v310.pre": # This is the right place to customize your
installation o
f SpamAssassin.
[86465] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor
[86465] dbg: razor2: razor2 is avai
Peter Pluta wrote:
>
>
>
> Gary V-2 wrote:
>>
>>>Vahur Jõesalu wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Peter Pluta wrote:
>>> >> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with Postfix + Amavisd-new + Spamassassin
>>>(razor,
>>> >> pyazor) + Clamav. I'm getting some nasty spams, as in 20-30 per day.
>>> My
>>> >> email is relati
Gary V-2 wrote:
>
>>Vahur Jõesalu wrote:
>> >
>> > Peter Pluta wrote:
>> >> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with Postfix + Amavisd-new + Spamassassin
>>(razor,
>> >> pyazor) + Clamav. I'm getting some nasty spams, as in 20-30 per day.
>> My
>> >> email is relatively new, i'm trying to figure out if r
Vahur Jõesalu wrote:
>
> Peter Pluta wrote:
>> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with Postfix + Amavisd-new + Spamassassin
(razor,
>> pyazor) + Clamav. I'm getting some nasty spams, as in 20-30 per day. My
>> email is relatively new, i'm trying to figure out if razor and pyzor
are
>> working.
>>
>> I n
Vahur Jõesalu wrote:
>
> Peter Pluta wrote:
>> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with Postfix + Amavisd-new + Spamassassin (razor,
>> pyazor) + Clamav. I'm getting some nasty spams, as in 20-30 per day. My
>> email is relatively new, i'm trying to figure out if razor and pyzor are
>> working.
>>
>> I n
Peter Pluta wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with Postfix + Amavisd-new + Spamassassin (razor,
pyazor) + Clamav. I'm getting some nasty spams, as in 20-30 per day. My
email is relatively new, i'm trying to figure out if razor and pyzor are
working.
I noticed this in my spamassassin -D output:
[8
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> It could be. SA will only use headers it can trust for this test. Once
> you go back far enough the message has been on an untrusted server, that
> Recieved header (and all the others) could be forged, thus can't be used
> here.
Hmm, tha
I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with Postfix + Amavisd-new + Spamassassin (razor,
pyazor) + Clamav. I'm getting some nasty spams, as in 20-30 per day. My
email is relatively new, i'm trying to figure out if razor and pyzor are
working.
I noticed this in my spamassassin -D output:
[81423] dbg: plugin: lo
Gene Heskett schrieb:
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 6/9/2007 6:50 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thank
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
>Yet Another Ninja wrote:
>> On 6/9/2007 6:50 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
>>> At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic
Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
DDoS protection.
Great news and good work! I assume we can re-enable sa-update for
tonigh
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 6/9/2007 6:50 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
DDoS protection.
Great news and good work!
On 6/9/2007 6:50 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
DDoS protection.
Great news and good work! I assume we can re-enable
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Jerry Durand wrote:
>At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
>>Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
>>GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
>>DDoS protection.
>
>Great news and good work! I assume we can re-
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
DDoS protection.
Great news and good work! I assume we can re-enable sa-update for
tonight's run.
Thanks for
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 6/7/2007 2:52 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems all were unable to connect for their daily RDJ update
yesterday. I time out trying to reach http://rulesemporium.com. Does
anyone know what's happeni
Alexis Manning wrote:
> I have the following entry in my local.cf and it doesn't seem to be
> hitting. I've looked at the documentation and it looks like I'm doing
> it right, but obviously not! Any thoughts?
>
Is mf1.spamfiltering.com, and all the hosts leading up to it, part of
your trust
I have the following entry in my local.cf and it doesn't seem to be
hitting. I've looked at the documentation and it looks like I'm doing
it right, but obviously not! Any thoughts?
I do note that that correspondant is starting their email address with a
capital letter, but surely this test is
24 matches
Mail list logo
