FYI -- trunk/3.3.0 updates are now working.
Thanks :-)
Although, I think I'll also take earlier advice 'stay here' (a stable
working 3.2.x) for a bit.
--
Thanks,
JTDeLys
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], SM wrote:
Hi Tony,
At 15:01 06-07-2007, Tony Houghton wrote:
I just use the one built in to my ADSL router; I don't know whether it
caches. The one it forwards to at my ISP is probably bind.
The DNS server on your ADSL router is built for residential
usage. If you
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been mentioned and I've missed it, but
I noted today that since upgrading from 3.2.0 to 3.2.1 bayes stopped
working, or rather, bayes started ignoring the username etc passed
from the local.cf.
Using bayes_sql_override_username has resolved the issue. My worry
Tony Houghton wrote:
SA used to kill a different router I used to have, but I don't think
that's the problem here.
I don't see how even a low end router would have a problem with the
amount of data from DNS lookups that could be generated. It must have
been something else.
I temporarily
omehegan wrote:
Any other thoughts on this? I got another 5-6 spams this morning that were
scored 0 by Bayes. It's dragging down the hits from other rules!
I have seen this too when the volume of spam to learn from is much
larger than the volume of non-spam and the total quantity of learned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill McGonigle wrote:
I've seen plenty of spam hit the RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP rule and just recently
noticed that the default score is only 0.23.
My first impression is that if they're sending from an unassigned
address then I ought to just crank
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bob Proulx wrote:
Tony Houghton wrote:
SA used to kill a different router I used to have, but I don't think
that's the problem here.
I don't see how even a low end router would have a problem with the
amount of data from DNS lookups that could be generated. It must
Tony Houghton wrote:
I switch my PC off overnight and I noticed the router would crash
shortly after switching it back on and deduced it was because of the
large volume of mail being fetched in one go. It was OK if I got my
PC to use my ISP's DNS instead.
Strange. Frankly that just seems
At 06:10 07-07-2007, Tony Houghton wrote:
SA used to kill a different router I used to have, but I don't think
that's the problem here. I temporarily pointed /etc/resolv.conf to my
ISP's servers and restarted spamd, which you'd expect to make at least
some difference, but it didn't really.
Hello all you block list provides,
I now have a new and better spam feed for those running block lists.
There's a new specification for automated reporting of spam.
http://www.mipassoc.org/arf/
I wrote a little Pascal program to do this spec and can now forward spam
as an attachment. I'm
At 06:10 07-07-2007, Tony Houghton wrote:
SA used to kill a different router I used to have, but I don't think
that's the problem here. I temporarily pointed /etc/resolv.conf to my
ISP's servers and restarted spamd, which you'd expect to make at least
some difference, but it didn't really.
11 matches
Mail list logo