> Am 2008-02-08 01:49:52, schrieb Gene Heskett:
> > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed to
> > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed? I vaguely recall
> > feeding it my corpus of another folder it was having trouble with a year
> > ago,
> > th
> Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
> > > to
> > > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
> >
> > Dunno if there are limitations -- however, your 7k messages should be
> > perfectly fi
On 12.02.08 13:41, The Doctor wrote:
> I indicated a whtielist_from in the universal configuration file
> and still there is {spam?} label.
>
> What should I be fixing?
maybe the label is inserted before your mail server/spam filter processes
the message
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTEC
Hello,
I'm setting up a gateway spamfilter mailserver. And I like to be able to give
with spamc the path to the user_prefs file for the right domain. So the user
does not exists, so I can not use the -U option.
I have read this patch
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4405 a
Maarten wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up a gateway spamfilter mailserver. And I like to be able
to give with spamc the path to the user_prefs file for the right
domain. So the user does not exists, so I can not use the -U option.
I have read this patch
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/sho
All
We've been using the following pyzor server..
82.94.255.100:24441
For many years now as the 'official' one seemed not to update.
Now this this seems to be dead as well (well people on the MailScanner IRC
channel also report no activity from this).
Any news or good alternates?
--
Martin H
Use Razor.
Its faster, more people use it, (the more you use it the more accurate it
is) and its no longer restricted.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>|SECNAP Network Security
Winner 2008 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
_
T
I just checked my logs because I was surprised to here this and it looks
like 82.94.255.100:24441 is what I'm still using and my
MailScanner-SpamAssassin log entries are still showing that sa rule
being tripped by some transactions. 263 so far today and 1740 yesterday
average sa-checked messages i
Greetings
Is using sa-compile the standard now?
... or are most organizations still just using the stock formatted rulesets?
If not the standard, is it the SA recommended standard?
I know there can be problems or issues, yet if we do use sa-compile as
instructed by the documentation, should we
Greetings everyone. I'm new to the list because I need help
desperately. I've been using spamassassin for many years and it has
gone a long way to fixing spam, so first, thank you for the great product.
System is Fedora Linux 6 running sendmail. Mail is delivered for local
users with procma
>
> I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using it.
>
> That said, I still cannot get it to work on my system. Everything works
> fine with the standard rulesets, but as soon as I enable the compiled
> rules
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 09:45 -0800, Tim Alberts wrote:
> Greetings everyone. I'm new to the list because I need help
> desperately. I've been using spamassassin for many years and it has
> gone a long way to fixing spam, so first, thank you for the great product.
>
> System is Fedora Linux 6 r
Robert - elists wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Is using sa-compile the standard now?
>
> ... or are most organizations still just using the stock formatted
> rulesets?
>
> If not the standard, is it the SA recommended standard?
>
> I know there can be problems or issues, yet if we do use sa-compile as
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 10:15 -0800, Tim Alberts wrote:
> Rubin Bennett wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 09:45 -0800, Tim Alberts wrote:
> >
> >> Greetings everyone. I'm new to the list because I need help
> >> desperately. I've been using spamassassin for many years and it has
> >> gone a lon
Robert - elists wrote:
> > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using
> > it.
> >
> > That said, I still cannot get it to work on my system. Everything
> > works fine with the standard rulesets, but as soo
Rubin Bennett wrote:
spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist
(Googled for SpamAssassin AWL remove entry)
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AwlWrongWay
Also man spamassassin should give you some more details about that
command :)
Rubin
yahoo'd - spamassassin auto white list clear
Guess t
Rubin Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 09:45 -0800, Tim Alberts wrote:
Greetings everyone. I'm new to the list because I need help
desperately. I've been using spamassassin for many years and it has
gone a long way to fixing spam, so first, thank you for the great product.
System is
At 09:45 13-02-2008, Tim Alberts wrote:
some (very important) customers and it's really a problem right
now. Where is the score 244.3 coming from? The sender is
whitelisted for -100?
[snip]
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=244.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version
> At 09:45 13-02-2008, Tim Alberts wrote:
>> some (very important) customers and it's really a
>> problem right now. Where is the score 244.3 coming
>> from? The sender is whitelisted for -100?
>> [snip]
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=244.3 required=5.0
>> tests=AWL,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST auto
100% of the non-English email we're getting is spam, so I added this to
my local.cf file:
ok_languages en
However, I can't see that it's having any effect at all. I'm still
getting tons of Russian and asian spams that don't seem to even be
triggering any SA rules at all. Am I using the config o
R. Steven Rainwater wrote:
100% of the non-English email we're getting is spam, so I added this to
my local.cf file:
ok_languages en
However, I can't see that it's having any effect at all.
Steven,
I think you might need to uncomment
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
in
> 100% of the non-English email we're getting is spam, so I
> added this to my local.cf file:
>
>
> ok_languages en
>
>
> However, I can't see that it's having any effect at all.
> I'm still getting tons of Russian and asian spams that
> don't seem to even be triggering any SA rules at all. Am
> -Original Message-
> I think you might need to uncomment
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
>
> in /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre (or your equivalent).
>
> As an aside, I'm afraid I simply reject some of them out of hand if
they
> contain a particular MIME charset
Tim Alberts wrote:
Thank you for responding Rubin. I disable the AWL with main
spamassassin local.cf config file and the line 'auto_learn 0' correct?
Not quite. If you run "spamassassin --lint" with that directive in
place, you should get an error reported.
Add "use_auto_whitelist 0" to lo
Hi All,
I've got SA 3.1.9-1 on CentOS 5.1 and I see these messages:
...
Feb 13 16:55:51 nexus spamd[1837]: spamd: handle_user unable to find user:
'corey'
Feb 13 16:55:51 nexus spamd[1837]: spamd: still running as root: user not
specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobo
I will be out of the office starting 02/13/2008 and will not return until
02/18/2008.
I will be out of the office until Jan 30rd. I will respond to your message
when I return.
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 6:38 am, Martin.Hepworth wrote:
> All
>
> We've been using the following pyzor server..
>
> 82.94.255.100:24441
>
> For many years now as the 'official' one seemed not to update.
>
> Now this this seems to be dead as well (well people on the MailScanner IRC
> channel a
Hello,
At 19:50 13-02-2008, Dale's Stuff wrote:
I would like to see the evidence of any claimed spam or other
inappropriate emails that would cause this domain to be listed as a
banned server.
The domain is listed in a few blacklists. You'll have to contact
them for evidence.
Regards,
-sm
I have an older slackware 9 box running SA, and I have compiled and
installed GPG (1.4.2) into /usr/local/bin, running sa-update from cron
gives me this error: "error: gpg required but not found!"
I've found that comes from here:
if ($GPGPath =
Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::find_executable_in_env_pat
Dale's Stuff wrote:
Hello,
Trying to figure out what the criteria is for getting a domain listed
in sa-blacklist.current, and more importantly how to be de-listed.
List: AFAIK, you only need to be the From: address on spam sent to one
of Will Stern's spamtrap.
Delist: Contact Will Sterns.
Hello,
Trying to figure out what the criteria is for getting a domain listed in
sa-blacklist.current, and more importantly how to be de-listed.
For some reason one of my domains has all of a sudden been listed in the
above listed db. Which is rather ironic since there are only 3 active
accou
Hi,
We don't use the offizial pyzor server anymore, but run
our own patched version, with mysql support.
So it is still a useful filtering mechanism, additionally
to ixhash, razor etc.
--
Martin
Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
32 matches
Mail list logo
