When manually running spamassassin -r on a spam I sometimes see this:
[27497] warn: reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory
reporter: razor2 had unknown error during authenticate
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm line
217, line 1.
at /usr/l
I haven't heard anything about the DOB list from Support Intelligence in
several months and that was only to hear about timeouts. Is it still a
viable list? Does anyone use it? I know it does still respond but I
haven't used it in over a year. Back then it seemed to work well.
I have acces
MISSING_SUBJECT is, at least in my opinion, incorrect. The Subject
header is there, it do EXISTS. It's empty, OK but it's not MISSING.
You are in the realm of philosophy. I would agree with you that
semantically :exists is not doing what it would imply (by name) that it is
doing, sin
I run the update via a crontab entry (set when logged in as root) how do
I specify who its done by and what the umask is?
spamassassin is run by postfix user - all this part of the setup should
be fine as I haven't played with the config files and it had all been
running well.
I run the test a
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pastebin for email: http://pastebin.ca/1018368
> Pastebin for spam check results: http://pastebin.ca/1018373
>
> Thanks
> Kate
>
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 16:25 +1200, Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
> >
> >> which
I run sa-update from the crontab daily which I believe should update the
rules. (i'm relatively new to this so could have it completely wrong)
The command I use in crontab is
00 01 * * * sa-update --allowplugins --channelfile
/etc/mail/spamassassin/update-channels.txt --gpgkeyfile
/etc/mail/spa
Since Theo already answered most of the questions...
> Automatic deletion of spam above specific score set to 'Score 2'.
Don't. Seriously, don't.
Even with a really good, fundamental understanding of SA and massively
tweaked settings and custom rules, this is a highly dangerous thing to
do. You
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 09:09 +1200, Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
>
> Pastebin for email: http://pastebin.ca/1018368
> Pastebin for spam check results: http://pastebin.ca/1018373
OK. And what about my questions above? Err, wait, they are actually
below your reply. ;)
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 18:26, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> http://spamcop.net/
so spamcop still works with spamcop plugin ?
the website does not look like it can be done online anymore :(
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:46:04PM -0500, Jim Goode wrote:
> I have SpamAssassin Sensitivity set to 'Very High (2)' and
SA has no such setting,
> Automatic deletion of spam above specific score set to 'Score 2'.
SA can't do that.
> Is SpamAssassin placing '[SPAM 8.3 of 2.0]' in the subject line
Hi,
Pastebin for email: http://pastebin.ca/1018368
Pastebin for spam check results: http://pastebin.ca/1018373
Thanks
Kate
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 16:25 +1200, Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
which seems to me that it is actually loading up the correct files - yet
when
Hi,
I use version 3.1.9-1 on an SME Linux server and am getting confusing
results.
I have SpamAssassin Sensitivity set to 'Very High (2)' and
Automatic deletion of spam above specific score set to 'Score 2'.
With only 6 people in the office, one person appears to get most of the spam
that i
On Wed, May 14, 2008 16:45, Aaron Bennett wrote:
> My question is to people who've been using the rules in a real
> production environment -- do you see them working with the default
> scores, or have you tweaked them at all?
vbounce is working as default as designed :)
but you need to define a
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:03 -0400, Aaron Bennett wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >
> > Please check the recent archives for threads
> > about the VBounce plugin or backscatter.
>
> I apologize for not doing that... however, had I, I would have still
> asked the question because the advice g
>
> Is anyone using these rules for spam detection? If so,
> how have you been scoring them? I'm glad to have a
> confirmation that 0.1 is obviously not enough but I'm
> curious how others are scoring these rules; given a
> general spam target of 5. I'm thinking of scoring in the
> range of 1.5
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 16:25 +1200, Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
> which seems to me that it is actually loading up the correct files - yet
> when i do a test on a piece of mail which should hit heaps of rules
> especially the sought_rules it is not hitting at all.
> Are there any other tests I can
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Please check the recent archives for threads
about the VBounce plugin or backscatter.
I apologize for not doing that... however, had I, I would have still
asked the question because the advice given is not suitable for an
enterprise deployment:
# If you use this
Still getting the same problem. Thanks for the tip thou.
Any email i check using spamc or spamassassin works.
So it must be the way the mta Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.3
is passing the headers to spamassassin.
I tried launching spamd in debug mode really not enough information. Is there
a
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 02:19:59AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is SA capable of doing such a thing?
Sure, you can do anything you want, basically, in SA, but you'd have to write
a plugin to do what you want here.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"It's the ego trip of the century to write your
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:17:35PM +0530, ram wrote:
> I was wondering if there could be a hosted site where I could cut paste
> my spams and find what scores would they get on a standard SA
> configuration with sa-update with all the channels
Sure, there could be. I don't think there is though.
> Aaron Bennett wrote:
> > production environment -- do you see them working with the default
> > scores, or have you tweaked them at all?
On 14.05.08 12:04, Matt Garretson wrote:
> I've set up a meta rule which adds more to the score if either
> ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE or VBOUNCE_MESSAGE hit.
pardo
Aaron Bennett wrote:
> production environment -- do you see them working with the default
> scores, or have you tweaked them at all?
I've set up a meta rule which adds more to the score if either
ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE or VBOUNCE_MESSAGE hit. I also have custom
rules that try to decrease the score
> I'm giving some though to deploying the Vbounce ruleset into an existing
> SA 3.1.9+Maia Mailguard / 5,000 user email environment. It makes good
> sense; the only thing that seems off is the scoring. As I see it, none
> of the rules score greater then 0.1. It's hard to see how that's going
I was wondering if there could be a hosted site where I could cut paste
my spams and find what scores would they get on a standard SA
configuration with sa-update with all the channels
That way I can see what rules I am missing and what I should be adding
I can also report spam if possible thru
Hi,
I'm giving some though to deploying the Vbounce ruleset into an existing
SA 3.1.9+Maia Mailguard / 5,000 user email environment. It makes good
sense; the only thing that seems off is the scoring. As I see it, none
of the rules score greater then 0.1. It's hard to see how that's going
t
Hi all,
Can the "tflags multiple" setting be used with mimeheader rules? Or only with
header, body, rawbody, uri, and full tests?
Also, where can I find some further info on how "tflags multiple" should be used - perhaps with an example or two? I can't find
anything in the SpamAssassin wiki on
Hi,
I'm using the following configuration: Qmail, vpopmail 5.4.1,
qmail-scanner 1.25st, spamassassin 3.11.
This is a hosting server so several domains are running on it. Users
(which aren't on the same subnet) are sending mails through their
clients using the SMTP service on the server. Problem
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.2.3 w/ Perl 5.8.8 on Linux.
I invoke it through a procmail recipe that says, in part,
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
My user_prefs file is as follows.
report_safe 0
required_score 4.0
score BAYES_50 0.1
score BAYES_80 3.0
score BAYES_95 4.0
score BAYES_99 5.0
bayes_journal_max_
mouss writes:
> Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:51:50 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why do you think
> >> that it pretends to look like backscatter, and why do you think it is not?
> >>
> >
>
Hi
Can someone suggest a rule (or rules) which will count the number of
lines in the body of a mail message? Or alternatively, a rule which
will tell me if a message contains less than N lines in its body?
Suppose, for example, I am looking to penalize messages which contain
a specific url and co
30 matches
Mail list logo
