-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[sent only to the original poster by accident - reply-to considered
"needs brain" ;) ]
| [skipped the debug output]
A couple of notes:
1) This advice:
| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
| configured; it is recom
Matthias Leisi wrote:
>
> A couple of notes:
>
> 1) This advice:
>
> > Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
> > configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
> > manually
>
> should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly redu
On Dienstag, 10. Juni 2008 peter pilsl wrote:
> I just uploaded three different examples of recent spamwave to my
> webpage:
> http://www.goldfisch.at/goldfisch/temp/spam1
As others said already, with simple network tests you could filter that
mails. Consider using the BOTNET tool, that helps too
Hello,
On 30.05.08 11:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I'd like to use WrongMX plugin on our mailservers (I found it very good
> idea and I was explicitly searching for it), but I'd like to ask a few
> questions, if someone of you uses it:
>
> - did you modify score of it?
>
> - did you modif
Hello,
I noticed when having
whitelist_bounce_relays mailhub?.nextra.sk smail2.tnce.sk *.fw.nextra.sk
some messages are still marked as BOUNCE, even when received by matching
host:
SA headers:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on t02.nx
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, s
On 11.06.08 09:07, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> [sent only to the original poster by accident - reply-to considered
> "needs brain" ;) ]
your MUA needs brain, pardon, List-Reply function...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail ad
Matthias Leisi wrote:
1) This advice:
| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
| configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
manually
should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce
the number of DNS lookups and can avoid
At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote:
How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be
useful to assign a probability to "Trust" at the least. I mean do I put
my ISP in my trusted server list? -- suppose they start partnering with
It could be a reputation system where you ass
If I do not control any mail servers is it necessary for the trusted networks
line to be set in my local.cf? If so, what addresses would I enter there?
I'm asking this because of this line in the Wiki:
Generally you want trusted_networks set to contain all the mailservers you
control that add Re
Chris wrote:
If I do not control any mail servers is it necessary for the trusted networks
line to be set in my local.cf?
In most cases you want to trust all the mailservers the MX back. If you
don't control any mailservers at all, then you would substitute to
trusting your ISPs mailsers.
I
Nobody has a hint?
Chris
On Mo, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:56:25 +0200, Vinogratzky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a installation of spamassassin with postfix and amavis.
> sa-update brings up an error:
> "dns: query failed: 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org => no nameservers"
> which is strange. DNS is working.
11 matches
Mail list logo
