Re: sa-update on Windows

2008-07-27 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:19:19PM -0500, Shawn Berg wrote: > company's firewall logs EVERY outgoing connection and when I run > sa-update from the command prompt, no connection is established > anywhere. Previously, I could see the connection being logged. > > Any troubleshooting help on this wou

sa-update on Windows

2008-07-27 Thread Shawn Berg
Greetings! New to the list so bear with me... I have been running SA on Exchange 2003 for quite some time and recently updated to 3.2.5. One thing I have noticed is sa-update doesn't actually seem to be making a connection; as it had always done in the past. Our company's firewall logs EVERY ou

Re: Memory Leak?

2008-07-27 Thread jdow
From: "Larry Nedry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 2008, July 27 12:02 On 7/27/08 at 8:28 AM -0700 jdow wrote: These are important results. They show that you have a plenty fast enough machine for 100,000 emails per day, although given the fact that daytime is pretty bad compared to night t

Re: Memory Leak?

2008-07-27 Thread Larry Nedry
On 7/27/08 at 8:28 AM -0700 jdow wrote: >These are important results. They show that you have a plenty fast >enough machine for 100,000 emails per day, although given the fact >that daytime is pretty bad compared to night time you'd probably see >significant slowdowns in throughput during the day a

Re: Solution for Disaster spam?

2008-07-27 Thread jdow
From: "Jari Fredriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 2008, July 27 09:03 What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam that's quite common now? I usually don't use BAYES Things like Man killed by flying cocktail glass A-rod dropped from team Obama withdra

Re: Solution for Disaster spam?

2008-07-27 Thread jdow
From: "Arvid Ephraim Picciani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 2008, July 27 08:53 On Sunday 27 July 2008 17:43:44 Robert Nicholson wrote: What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam that's quite common now? nothing. see my previous post ( "0 Points") I usually d

Re: Solution for Disaster spam?

2008-07-27 Thread Dave Funk
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Robert Nicholson wrote: What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam that's quite common now? I usually don't use BAYES Things like *Man killed by flying cocktail glass* *A-rod dropped from team* *Obama withdraws support for Israel* That's StormWo

Re: Solution for Disaster spam?

2008-07-27 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> What have people been using to curtail some of the new > disaster spam that's quite common now? > > > I usually don't use BAYES > > > > Things like > > > Man killed by flying cocktail glass > > > A-rod dropped from team > > > Obama withdraws support for Israel Content preview: McCai

Re: Solution for Disaster spam?

2008-07-27 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
On Sunday 27 July 2008 17:43:44 Robert Nicholson wrote: > What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam that's > quite common now? nothing. see my previous post ( "0 Points") > I usually don't use BAYES doesn't help anyway. > Things like > > *Man killed by flying cocktai

Solution for Disaster spam?

2008-07-27 Thread Robert Nicholson
What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam that's quite common now? I usually don't use BAYES Things like *Man killed by flying cocktail glass* *A-rod dropped from team* *Obama withdraws support for Israel*

Re: Memory Leak?

2008-07-27 Thread jdow
From: "Ron Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 2008, July 27 06:16 My results for time spamc < (test email): real 0m0.354s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.005s My results for time spamassassin < (test email): real 0m5.310s user 0m1.969s sys 0m0.521s I clearly see slowdowns in spam on the weekend

Re: Memory Leak?

2008-07-27 Thread Ron Smith
Hello, all. Here's the current situation with what I was concerned was a memory leak. Since the Network Settings DNS was changed to the named process on the same machine as the CG Pro mail server some 36 hours ago, and the spamd settings were changed to spamd -d -x -q -u nobody -x -m 4 --