Hi,
I use spamassassin 3.1.8 and i have developped an Mail program but my mail
are tagged with theses two tags RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO and SARE_RECV_SUSP_3.
Where could i found complete explain on theses tags to correct my program ?
Regards
Philippe
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 19:15 -0500, maillist wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >
> > RBL hits. They most likely have been updated since the original scan.
> > Since you get this result with a subsequent spamc run, too, we pretty
> > much can rule out permanent DNS failures or local tests option.
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
RBL hits. They most likely have been updated since the original scan.
Since you get this result with a subsequent spamc run, too, we pretty
much can rule out permanent DNS failures or local tests option. Still, a
(potentially local) temporary DNS issue might explain it
> The test score for that message was 6.269 ( 7 is required ) and the
^
> tests that it hit were:
> BAYES_80,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HS_BOBAX_MID_2,RDNS_NONE
> ...however, when I manually run it through either spamc -c < 7.txt or
> spamassass
> Another responded with a request for more info. I posted one small
> message here...
That would have been me. ;)
> http://emailacs.com/temp/J872209005Tq/7.txt
>
> The test score for that message was 6.269 ( 7 is required ) and the
> tests that it hit were:
> BAYES_80,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HS_
Bowie Bailey wrote:
maillist wrote:
Hi guys,
slackware 11.0
spamassassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.64
sendmail 8.14
I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it
looks like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam
mes
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-07-24 04:54:58, schrieb Michael Scheidell:
amazon.com has a decade long history of spamming and should not be in
the def_whitelist_from_spf or dnswl.
they have a history of rfc abuse (the bounce emails to abuse@, with 'if
you wish to report fraud or phish, go t
> I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it looks
> like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam message, and
> run it through "spamassassin -t", then it shows that it should be spam,
> but during the process when the mail actually comes in, it is scoring
A manual expire run took less than 2 minutes -- closer to 1 minuteHow
impatient
is SA ??
John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:35 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
Jul 25 15:28:21 Ishtar spamd[2355]: bayes: expire_old_tokens: child processing
timeout at /usr/bin/spamd line 1085, line 22.
maillist wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> slackware 11.0
> spamassassin version 3.2.5
> running on Perl version 5.8.8
> mimedefang version 2.64
> sendmail 8.14
>
> I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it
> looks like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam
> message
Hi guys,
slackware 11.0
spamassassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.64
sendmail 8.14
I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it looks
like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam message, and
run it through "spamassassin -t
On Monday, Jul 28th 2008 at 12:03 -, quoth Mark Martinec:
=>Dan,
=>
=>> I installed WrongMX.pm today, on my secondary MX, but it does not appear
=>> to be firing. A spamassassin -D --lint does show the module to be
=>> loaded, and the module shows up in my amavisd-new logs:
=>>
=>> Jul 23 13:
I'm getting a lot of errors like:
Jul 28 09:16:24 smtp4.sea.intelius.com spamd: __alarm__ignore__
Jul 28 09:16:24 smtp4.sea.intelius.com spamd: caught at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
419
Jul 28 09:16:24 smtp4.sea.intelius.com spamd: timeout with em
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:20:16PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> I seem to remember the wiki explains the update process and how DNS is
> involved. Can't find it though. Maybe I am just confusing it with list
> posts.
You may be thinking of
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/PublishingRuleU
Dan,
> I installed WrongMX.pm today, on my secondary MX, but it does not appear
> to be firing. A spamassassin -D --lint does show the module to be
> loaded, and the module shows up in my amavisd-new logs:
>
> Jul 23 13:33:56 foo amavis[17285]: (17285-01) extra modules
> loaded: /etc/mail/spamass
Am 2008-07-24 04:54:58, schrieb Michael Scheidell:
> amazon.com has a decade long history of spamming and should not be in
> the def_whitelist_from_spf or dnswl.
>
> they have a history of rfc abuse (the bounce emails to abuse@, with 'if
> you wish to report fraud or phish, go to this url, jump
Please keep mailing list conversation on-list, either by replying to all
or to list. Back on-list to close the dangling thread.
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 07:50 -0500, Shawn Berg wrote:
> With the frequesncy of DNS look-ups, DNS logging is not enabled. Once
> I did enable the logging of DNS requests
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 23:36 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:19:19PM -0500, Shawn Berg wrote:
> > company's firewall logs EVERY outgoing connection and when I run
> > sa-update from the command prompt, no connection is established
> > anywhere. Previously, I could see the
18 matches
Mail list logo
