SA poor scores after reboot

I run an Ubuntu machine with qmail, qmail-scanner and SpamAssassin. Yes, I know this isn't the qmail or qmail-scanner list, but I genuinely think this is an SA issue. Well, a user issue with SA, really. Normally, the system runs great, rejecting heaps of spam. But after a reboot (our power

RE: SA poor scores after reboot

Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: I run an Ubuntu machine with qmail, qmail-scanner and SpamAssassin. Yes, I know this isn't the qmail or qmail-scanner list, but I genuinely think this is an SA issue. Well, a user issue with SA, really. Normally, the system runs great, rejecting heaps of

re2c/sa-compile failures with SOUGHT ruleset?

Ever since I've updated to the SOUGHT ruleset I get fairly consistent sa-compile failures. I looked through the archives, but found only a note to update to the latest re2c, which I have done with no real change. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ re2c --version re2c 0.13.5 About once a week the

RE: re2c/sa-compile failures with SOUGHT ruleset?

-Original Message- From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:28 PM To: SpamAssassin Users Subject: re2c/sa-compile failures with SOUGHT ruleset? Ever since I've updated to the SOUGHT ruleset I get fairly consistent sa-compile failures. I looked

Re: Honeypot Email Addresses

jdow wrote: I believe you could blacklist_from. That would train SpamAssassin's Bayes filter - Or not. Both USER_IN_BLACKLIST and USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO have tflags set to userconf noautolearn (in current 3.2.5 rules), which means that SpamAssassin will ignore their scores when deciding whether