I find i have to run botnet rules individually, not as the big meta rule. See
the doc in the tar ball for how to.
-- martin
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Stroik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:25 -0700, fchan wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I don't have experience with this product.
I do have limited experience with Barracuda Networks appliance and I
think is a great product for an e-mail filter which I had experienced
with my friend to set up on their network email
ram schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:25 -0700, fchan wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I don't have experience with this product.
I do have limited experience with Barracuda Networks appliance and I
think is a great product for an e-mail filter which I had experienced
with my friend to set up on their
Christian Gregoire wrote:
Hello,
Is there any alternative to the %u, %l or %d options to the
virtual-config-dir option ? I have 12 000 mailboxes, that is, as many entries
in only one directory ...
SQL
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.2/sql/README
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 05:03:06PM +0100, David Carvalho wrote:
Is it possible to redirect classified spam to another file, just after
classification, instead of
No.
Well, it's possible to do, but it's not possible for spamassassin to do
it by itself. In
Hi all,
I'm looking for some regex to find a list of strings in the body,
independent where they are and so on.
Example:
i am Nice Girl good looking girl who is looking to chat with you.
email me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i will reply back with some really nice pics or skype realtime videos.
patrickbaer schrieb:
Hi all,
I'm looking for some regex to find a list of strings in the body,
independent where they are and so on.
Example:
i am Nice Girl good looking girl who is looking to chat with you.
email me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i will reply back with some really nice pics or
This is the email that went through. Nothing about razor though?
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from medusa.tvwerk.de ([unix socket])
by medusa2 (Cyrus v2.2.13-Debian-2.2.13-10.cb1.1) with LMTPA;
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:33:23 +0200
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 05:56 -0700, patrickbaer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for some regex to find a list of strings in the body,
independent where they are and so on.
Example:
i am Nice Girl good looking girl who is looking to chat with you.
email me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i will
patrickbaer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for some regex to find a list of strings in the body,
independent where they are and so on.
Example:
i am Nice Girl good looking girl who is looking to chat with you.
email me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i will reply back with some really nice pics or
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, fchan wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I don't have experience with this product.
I do have limited experience with Barracuda Networks appliance and I think is
a great product for an e-mail filter which I had experienced with my friend
to set up on their network email server. It is easy
patrickbaer wrote:
I'm looking for some regex to find a list of strings in the body,
independent where they are and so on.
Sounds more like your looking for a meta rule.
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
and search for meta
The most common phrases are: nice girl, good looking, chat with
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Karl Pearson wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, fchan wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I don't have experience with this product.
I do have limited experience with Barracuda Networks appliance and I think
is a great product for an e-mail filter which I had experienced with my
friend to set up
At 03:16 PM 9.11.2008 +0200, Mariusz Kruk wrote:
On czw, 2008-09-11 at 15:06 +0200, John Wilcock wrote:
No need for that attitude, we were all newbies once...
Sorry, wasn't meant as an insult or anything like that. Was more like
surprised because I really didn't understand the problem.
It
Karl,
Ease of setup and use are not the primary reason for purchasing any
product, IMO.
Yes, but you aren't the common user. Many commercial products *must*
have oversimplified setups if they want the largest possible customer
base. Consider the difference between the primary goals of
Excellent points. I'm glad I'm not a 'common user'...
KLP
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Jesse Stroik wrote:
Karl,
Ease of setup and use are not the primary reason for purchasing any
product, IMO.
Yes, but you aren't the common user. Many commercial products *must* have
oversimplified setups if
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:45:43 -0500
Jack L. Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to be a bother on this again, it is the shell issue. Is anyone
running the csh (or tcsh) shell and know what the syntax should be to
make this work? It works in the borne shell (sh). I've read the man
pages on the
Jesse Stroik wrote:
Karl,
Ease of setup and use are not the primary reason for purchasing any
product, IMO.
Yes, but you aren't the common user. Many commercial products *must*
have oversimplified setups if they want the largest possible customer
base.
It's more than a common user
At 09:44 12-09-2008, Jesse Stroik wrote:
setups if they want the largest possible customer base. Consider
the difference between the primary goals of spamassassin and
arbitrary commercial anti-spam solution:
Spamassassin: To facilitate a community effort with the primary goal
of accurate
I just installed SpamAssassin 3.2.5 and after doing a sa-update and
sa-compile I get the following:
Illegal octal digit '8' ignored at /usr/local/bin/sa-compile line 631,
$fh line 2436.
Wide character in print at /usr/local/bin/sa-compile line 385, $fh
line 2436.
They compile w/o errors, but
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Sorry to be a bother on this again, it is the shell issue. Is anyone
running the csh (or tcsh) shell and know what the syntax should be to make
this work? It works in the borne shell (sh). I've read the man pages on the
shells but no joy with various
Mouss,
mouss wrote:
It's more than a common user question. while I can build an
*BSD/Debian/Centos box to do what I want, I did buy COTS firewalls,
backup servers, ... etc.
You're not talking about ease of setup, you're talking about quality and
reliability of product. Spamassassin
Gentlemen, I am frustrated by the duplication of information in:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
3.2.5-mon_sep__8_23_53_29_2008.jidanni2.jidanni.org (2008-06-10) on
jidanni2.jidanni.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=1.9 tests=none autolearn=disabled
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentlemen, I am frustrated by the duplication of information in:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
3.2.5-mon_sep__8_23_53_29_2008.jidanni2.jidanni.org (2008-06-10) on
jidanni2.jidanni.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=1.9
Hi,
I'm experiencing the exact same problem with 3.2.3, y fix was simply
to manually specify the spam score:
# adjust for high efficiency rules
score URIBL_BLACK 50
score URIBL_JP_SURBL 50
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 50
score RAZOR2_CHECK 50
score BAYES_99 50
# short circuit high efficiency
I have heard that the sonicwall email security appliance is pretty good. It
gets expensive per user, but they have desktop controls in outlook.
The other one is the service offered by mcaffee enterprise... I don't
remember the name, but its essentially a service they host and your mail
server
If your using postfix, you could create a bash script that reads the email
as its passed back to postfix from SA, matches text and then sends that
matching email to a specific user. You could even set it up to send to
different mailboxes based on matching different text.
If your interested, I
27 matches
Mail list logo
