New Mandriva 2009, SA not scanning

2008-12-31 Thread Chris
I've been working on updating to MDV2009 and have SA installed. Fetchmail fetches ok, procmail is tossing to the folders, but, SA seems not to be scanning. I can scan a message from the cli but whereas before it would score mail to my inbox it no longer does that. I backed up my entire /etc/mai

Re: Spamassassin OE / Outlook ratware issue

2008-12-31 Thread Alex Nee
Ignore the snipit in my first Post Here is the one you want sorry ... header __OE_MUN X-Mailer =~ /^Microsoft Outlook Express [456]\.[0-9]{2}\.[0-9]{4}\.[0-9]{4}$/ header __OE_MUA X-Mailer =~ /\b Outlook Express [456]\./ header __OE_MSGID_1 MESSAGEID

Spamassassin OE / Outlook ratware issue

2008-12-31 Thread Alex Nee
I am not sure if i can post this here, but i will give it a go I have found that the fix bellow stops certain current versions of Outlook Express being picked up as invalid / forged Request for Change--- SpamAssassin vers

Looking for a volunteer for MX Backup service test

2008-12-31 Thread Marc Perkel
Looking few a few domains to test and automated MX backup service with some spam filtering. What you do is this. Add these two MX records as your two highest MX records. mail.example.com 10 mxbackup1.junkemailfilter.com 20 mxbackup2.junkemailfilter.com 30 And in theory it will just work. If it

Re: cuda

2008-12-31 Thread Ben Winslow
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:12:08 -0500 jp wrote: > Would there be any performance to be gained by SpamAssassin if it > were adapted to support cuda where possible? It seems spamd is both > multicore friendly and pretty CPU intensive and if it could offload > some of that work, it might be helpful. It

cuda

2008-12-31 Thread jp
Would there be any performance to be gained by SpamAssassin if it were adapted to support cuda where possible? It seems spamd is both multicore friendly and pretty CPU intensive and if it could offload some of that work, it might be helpful. It appears a $200 nvidia chipped video card can do so

Re: spamassassin & msrbl

2008-12-31 Thread mouss
sebast...@debianfan.de a écrit : > Hello, > > how to integrate the msrbl.com - lists in spamassassin? > > > *** > We currently provide the following RBLs: > > * virus.rbl.msrbl.net - Hosts found sending virus mails > * phishing.rbl.msrbl.net - Hosts found sending phishing mails > *

2 weird errors ... Might be interconnected

2008-12-31 Thread Frank DeChellis
Hi there, We are running Spamassassin 3.2.1. I am getting these error messages repeatedly but I can¹t find where to specify the directory: spam-filter spamd[9476]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create lockfile /nonexistent/.spamassassin/auto-whitel

spamassassin & msrbl

2008-12-31 Thread sebast...@debianfan.de
Hello, how to integrate the msrbl.com - lists in spamassassin? *** We currently provide the following RBLs: * virus.rbl.msrbl.net - Hosts found sending virus mails * phishing.rbl.msrbl.net - Hosts found sending phishing mails * images.rbl.msrbl.net - Hosts found sending mail contan

Re: Implementing SPF

2008-12-31 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, December 31, 2008 06:29, Bijayant wrote: > > From all the discussions and reading all the replies in this thread > I have understood many things like > 1) We use smtp-auth for sending the mails. So, I can reject all > mails which are not generating from my mail server, reject sender domai

Re: white listing sendmail authenticated users

2008-12-31 Thread Matt Kettler
Bazooka Joe wrote: > I am trying (unsuccessfully) to write a rule to pickup if the > "authenticated bits=0" in the Received line of the header and give it > -100 > > I am not sure if spamass-milter Version 0.3.1is passing the Received > line to SA. > > Does anyone know if that works? Or a better wa

Re: Implementing SPF

2008-12-31 Thread ram
On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 21:30 -0800, Bijayant wrote: > >From all the discussions and reading all the replies in this thread I have > understood many things like > 1) We use smtp-auth for sending the mails. So, I can reject all mails which > are not generating from my mail server, right? This will be

Re: Implementing SPF

2008-12-31 Thread Bijayant
Bijayant wrote: > > From all the discussions and reading all the replies in this thread I have > understood many things like > 1) We use smtp-auth for sending the mails. So, I can reject all mails > which are not generating from my mail server, right? This will be a good > tactics. > Now the SP