Re: Obvious? Disabling some RBL/URIBL checks

2009-02-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Sat, February 7, 2009 03:55, Charles Sprickman wrote: Any ideas on what I've missed here? 1 a bind dns cache 2 subscribtion on paid spamhaus 3 disable some plugins in pre files 4 tell what spamassassin version you use 5 where i can get crystall balls :=) using isps dns servers with forward

Re: Obvious? Disabling some RBL/URIBL checks

2009-02-07 Thread Matt Kettler
Benny Pedersen wrote: On Sat, February 7, 2009 03:55, Charles Sprickman wrote: Any ideas on what I've missed here? 1 a bind dns cache 2 subscribtion on paid spamhaus 3 disable some plugins in pre files 4 tell what spamassassin version you use 5 where i can get crystall balls :=)

Re: Obvious? Disabling some RBL/URIBL checks

2009-02-07 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 21:55 -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: I'm a bit stumped on this one. We recently got notice that we have too much volume to continue using spamhaus queries, and the quote for our rather small userbase was near what we'd pay for outsourcing all of our spam filtering

Re: Filtering/ blocking forged emails

2009-02-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 06.02.09 16:00, Michael Scheidell wrote: (yes, I know, SPF is broken) and spammers can sign their spam with dkim, and spammers can run their own domains and put in valid spf records. No, it is not. There are other things that are broken and people blame SPF instead of them... -- Matus

Re: Filtering/ blocking forged emails

2009-02-07 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Scheidell wrote: (yes, I know, SPF is broken) and spammers can sign their spam with dkim, and spammers can run their own domains and put in valid spf records. It's not broken, just mislabeled, and thus people try to use it for things it's not designed for. SPF isn't a

not seeing any advantage to sa-learn?

2009-02-07 Thread Ricardo Kleemann
Hi, I have SA working very well for me, but there are still a few cases of spam that are very persistent, I still get a considerable amount of spam that SA doesn't catch. However, what is annoying is that no matter how much I feed through sa-learn, the SA score doesn't change much. I created

Re: not seeing any advantage to sa-learn?

2009-02-07 Thread jdow
You may need to expound a little more on your SpamAssassin setup. You cannot run sa-learn as root and have it do diddly. You must run it per user, generally. {^_^} - Original Message - From: Ricardo Kleemann rica...@americasnet.com To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Saturday,

Re: not seeing any advantage to sa-learn?

2009-02-07 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: I have SA working very well for me, but there are still a few cases of spam that are very persistent, I still get a considerable amount of spam that SA doesn't catch. However, what is annoying is that no matter how much I feed through sa-learn,