Re: Spamd still running as root?

2009-03-14 Thread LuKreme
On 14-Mar-2009, at 13:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote: bddd1...@kreme.com> Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org LuKreme wrote on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:20:49 -0600: Since I have both local and virtual users I don't see any choice but to run sa-learn as root. which means you want to run a "sitewide ba

Re: Experimental Plugin: MetaSVM

2009-03-14 Thread LuKreme
On 13-Mar-2009, at 21:21, decoder wrote: John Hardin wrote: If you want it to be dynamical, then the plugin could do the appending. However, the model cannot be extended, that means to incorporate new lines, the whole model must be recalculated. So this can't be done per message but only ma

Re: Experimental Plugin: MetaSVM

2009-03-14 Thread LuKreme
On 13-Mar-2009, at 15:24, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, decoder wrote: You create one model file once by feeding it a large corpus of ham +spam. The problem is that feeding does not work with an SVM algorithm. You have to train on the _whole_ set _always_, so feeding mails is un

Re: whitelist pattern problem

2009-03-14 Thread LuKreme
On 13-Mar-2009, at 12:58, Linda Walsh wrote: I get many emails addressed to internal sendmail 's. 123...@mydomain 1abd56.ef7...@mydomain (seem to fit a basic pattern but don't know how to specify the pattern (or I don't have it right): <(start of an email-address)>[0-9][0-9a-fa-f\@mydomain

Re: SPF_NEUTRAL scoring?

2009-03-14 Thread LuKreme
On 13-Mar-2009, at 11:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:17:29 +0100: There is no ~all in his spf record. I was assuming that a missing "all" might trigger this NEUTRAL (I haven't seen a single example without it yet). That's wrong, it seems. IIRC

Re: Spamd still running as root?

2009-03-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
bddd1...@kreme.com> Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org LuKreme wrote on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:20:49 -0600: > Since I have both local and virtual users I don't see any choice but > to run sa-learn as root. which means you want to run a "sitewide bayes". Oh, I'm repeating myself, sorry. Kai

Re: Spamd still running as root?

2009-03-14 Thread LuKreme
On 13-Mar-2009, at 11:31, RobertH wrote: i am guessing that he does not run SA as the vpopmail user, although i could be wrong. even so, UID and GID matters when running sa-learn, and if i cannot read the files it is processing because they do not have the required perms or UID/GID, then it

Re: Spamd still running as root?

2009-03-14 Thread LuKreme
On 13-Mar-2009, at 11:31, RobertH wrote: i am guessing that he does not run SA as the vpopmail user, although i could be wrong. even so, UID and GID matters when running sa-learn, and if i cannot read the files it is processing because they do not have the required perms or UID/GID, then it

Re: Experimental Plugin: MetaSVM

2009-03-14 Thread Justin Mason
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 21:24, John Hardin wrote: > On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, decoder wrote: > >> You create one model file once by feeding it a large corpus of ham+spam. > >> The problem is that feeding does not work with an SVM algorithm. You have >> to train on the _whole_ set _always_, so feeding m