On ons 26 aug 2009 02:59:06 CEST, Dennis German wrote
X-Spam-testscores: BAYES_00=-2.599,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MISSING_HEADERS=5.7,
SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=3.1,UPPERCASE_75_100=1.528
Does this indicate that bayes needs tuning/learning?
if you want bayes to know its spam yes, remember to train every ema
Hi,
> If you're using autolearning, what are your learning thresholds?
What do you recommend for thresholds? I'm considering using
autolearning, but very concerned about corrupting the database. I
think I would use something like +15 for spam.
There are FNs on occasion in the 2.x range with low
sa-learn --dump magic
config: could not find site rules directory
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 262297 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 24621 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 142776
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Dennis German wrote:
email with this content:
CONGRATULATION YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS WON YOU THE 2010 FIFA WORLDCUP LOTTER=
Y OPEN THE ATTACHMENT AND VIEW THE PROFILE OF YOUR WINNING FUND=2C ALSO CON=
TACT YOUR CLAIM AGENT
received these scores
X-Spam-testscores: BAYES_00=
email with this content:
CONGRATULATION YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS WON YOU THE 2010 FIFA WORLDCUP LOTTER=
Y OPEN THE ATTACHMENT AND VIEW THE PROFILE OF YOUR WINNING FUND=2C ALSO CON=
TACT YOUR CLAIM AGENT
received these scores
X-Spam-testscores: BAYES_00=-2.599,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MISSING_HEADERS=5.
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 15:07 +0200, a...@exys.org wrote:
> when testing spam with spamc -R i dont see any bayes rating. I cant
> remember seeing any _ever_.
Do you see BAYES_xx rules hitting, if you are *not* using the -R switch?
> Does that mean bayes has no rating, or is my spamc broken?
Sound
>
> Very cool. I think that's exactly what we want. How is the handoff
> to clamav handled? I would probably want that to be on the external
> server too.
Here you go. Smtp, well, that should be obvisous. Anyway, it' hands it off to
[IP]:PORT (clamsmtpd) which will then call back on 9993.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
>> We have a cluster of postfix servers through a load balancer. I would
>> like to set up an external set of spamassassin servers where these
>> postfix servers simply query the spamassassin servers over the network
>> for spam decisions then dro
> We have a cluster of postfix servers through a load balancer. I would
> like to set up an external set of spamassassin servers where these
> postfix servers simply query the spamassassin servers over the network
> for spam decisions then drop or relay accordingly. This is for
> outbound email
* Terry :
> Hello,
>
> We have a cluster of postfix servers through a load balancer. I would
> like to set up an external set of spamassassin servers where these
> postfix servers simply query the spamassassin servers over the network
> for spam decisions then drop or relay accordingly. This is
Hello,
We have a cluster of postfix servers through a load balancer. I would
like to set up an external set of spamassassin servers where these
postfix servers simply query the spamassassin servers over the network
for spam decisions then drop or relay accordingly. This is for
outbound email on
Michael,
> Mark Martinec wrote:
> > Fixed in 3.3.0:
> > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5965
>
> guess 3.3.0 is due out so soon that this won't be backported to 3.2.6?
>
> would that patch work on 3.2.5? (giving me an excuse for another port
> bump for SA?)
The posted pat
Mark Martinec wrote:
Fixed in 3.3.0:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5965
guess 3.3.0 is due out so soon that this won't be backported to 3.2.6?
would that patch work on 3.2.5? (giving me an excuse for another port
bump for SA?)
Mark
--
Michael Scheidel
Michael,
> FN on these three rules: (so how do I write a rule to match?)
> header __ST_ISMMS exists:X-MMS-Message-Type
> will also FN on THIS rule:
> header __ST_ISMMS X-MMS-Message-Type =~ /./
> and FN on this rule:
> header __ST_ISMMS X-MMS-Message-Type =~ /0/
>
> if header
> X-MMS-Message-Type:
Hi,
when testing spam with spamc -R i dont see any bayes rating. I cant
remember seeing any _ever_.
Does that mean bayes has no rating, or is my spamc broken?
FN on these three rules: (so how do I write a rule to match?)
header __ST_ISMMS exists:X-MMS-Message-Type
will also FN on THIS rule:
header __ST_ISMMS X-MMS-Message-Type =~ /./
and FN on this rule:
header __ST_ISMMS X-MMS-Message-Type =~ /0/
if header
X-MMS-Message-Type: 0
(seems eval tests
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 07:21 -0500, Igor Chudov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:54:08PM -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> > At 12:48 PM 8/24/2009, you wrote:
> >> Lately I have been receiving quite a bit of spams that promote films
> >> of the most indecent kind, involving persons of minor age. Example
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:54:08PM -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 12:48 PM 8/24/2009, you wrote:
>> Lately I have been receiving quite a bit of spams that promote films
>> of the most indecent kind, involving persons of minor age. Examples
>> are here:
>>
>> http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam009.tx
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:28 +0530, ram wrote:
> I am getting a lot of pill spams on the abuse@ ids
>
> I had thought spammers would not really be that naive. Usually anyone
> sitting at the abuse@ helpdesk is atleast smart enough to know not to
> respond to these fakes
>
> They are just creatin
19 matches
Mail list logo
