Re: spamd: respawning server - why?

2010-01-15 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 15/01/2010 11:42 AM, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > Yesterday one of our servers started having problems. I found the following > messages in the syslog file: > > Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost spamd[20926]: spamd: respawning server at > /usr/local/bin/spamd line 1080. > Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost s

Re: sa 3.2.1 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX

2010-01-15 Thread Mark Martinec
> since 3.2.1 is still stable in gentoo portage [...] > 3.2.5 is only marked unstable in gentoo old -> historical -> rotten -> decaying -> stable

Re: sa 3.2.1 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX

2010-01-15 Thread Benny Pedersen
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301125 hope it gets resolved now, point for me is that 3.2.5 is only marked unstable in gentoo, and i tryed to make another server with just stable ebuilds to see where remaining problems is -- xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Re: Faked _From_ field using our domain - how to filter/score?

2010-01-15 Thread Jonas Eckerman
1. It shows up as internal mail so gets -6 points or so from the auto-whitelist thus giving it a decent chance of getting through. If it shows up as internal mail even though its external something is wrong. The AWL takes both the renders email address and the sending systems IP-address int

Re: What are these headers?

2010-01-15 Thread Kris Deugau
Brent Gardner wrote: Anybody seen headers like this? X-SI: 538 X-EN: 1470024 X-SE: 69846 X-EV: 0 X-Job: 69846 X-SO: 2 I've seen them (or similar headers) in messages that passed through one or another third-party spam filter services (eg Postini, Messagelabs). If you can correlate the values

spamd: respawning server - why?

2010-01-15 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
Yesterday one of our servers started having problems. I found the following messages in the syslog file: Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost spamd[20926]: spamd: respawning server at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 1080. Jan 14 14:12:38 localhost spamd[20927]: spamd: respawning server at /usr/local/bin/spamd

Re: Spam getting through while SA restarts

2010-01-15 Thread RW
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:42:48 +0200 Jari Fredriksson wrote: > On 15.1.2010 10:21, geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote: > > I occasionally get a spam leaking through without having been > > processed by SA despite passing the part of my procmail filtering > > where SA is called. These spams

RE: newbie: configure SA to reject spam

2010-01-15 Thread tonjg
R-Elists wrote: > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sendmail+reject+spam+smtp wow thanks a million -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/newbie%3A-configure-SA-to-reject-spam-tp27149042p27174842.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Spam getting through while SA restarts

2010-01-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 15.1.2010 10:21, geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote: > I occasionally get a spam leaking through without having been processed > by SA despite passing the part of my procmail filtering where SA is > called. These spams are always at the time of scheduled SA restarts so I > assume they sl

Spam getting through while SA restarts

2010-01-15 Thread geoff . spamassassin3
I occasionally get a spam leaking through without having been processed by SA despite passing the part of my procmail filtering where SA is called. These spams are always at the time of scheduled SA restarts so I assume they slip through while it is down. SA is called as below, is there anythin

RE: newbie: configure SA to reject spam

2010-01-15 Thread R-Elists
> From: tonjg [mailto:t...@freeuk.com] > On 01/13/2010 07:22 PM, tonjg wrote: > > thanks for your response Ned. > your last line describes exactly what I want to do - reject > mail, do it at the smtp stage in sendmail - but I don't know > how to achieve this. > -- TonJ, http://lmgtfy.com/