Hi,
I have installed spam-assassin in my mail server and when i sent mails
from my gmail accout i always get these errors.
* 2.4 DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS RBL: Envelope sender listed in bl.open-whois.org.
* 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Because of these errors my
On 05/29/2010 05:03 AM, Yves Goergen wrote:
>> Stepping away from the ZMI issue and headig towards the larger
>> picture, what kind of spam are you trying to nail down with this
>> ruleset? What goals did you hope to meet with the ZMI rules? If
>> it's a specific type of spam, can you pastebin
aquero wrote:
> Hi,
> When i checked the third party softwares for spam-assassin i found many
> custom rule sets. Do I have to install these rule sets manually? If I
> perform sa-update, will it will include all these rule sets into my
> spam-assassin rules list?
Before you start adding a bunch
I am using Extracttext from
http://whatever.frukt.org/spamassassin.text.shtml#ExtractText.pm
It extracts text from attached .rtf .doc and some other formats. Then
feeds the results to BAYES and normal body testing.
My issues are that it works great with SA 3.2.5, However on the same
server it doe
On 4.6.2010 19:33, aquero wrote:
>
> Hi,
> When i checked the third party softwares for spam-assassin i found many
> custom rule sets. Do I have to install these rule sets manually? If I
> perform sa-update, will it will include all these rule sets into my
> spam-assassin rules list?
sa-update
aquero wrote:
Hi,
What is the maximum allowed spam score value for a legitimate mail? What
value should i set as the spam score limit?
On my own servers, I lean towards being a little extra conservative. I
don't tag subject lines until the score reaches 6. However, if the
score gets to
Hi,
When i checked the third party softwares for spam-assassin i found many
custom rule sets. Do I have to install these rule sets manually? If I
perform sa-update, will it will include all these rule sets into my
spam-assassin rules list?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> On 4.6.2010 18:53, aquero wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> What is the maximum allowed spam score value for a legitimate mail?
>> What
>> value should i set as the spam score limit?
>
> The default is 5 and that value works best for any installation, as the
> stock rules are
On 4.6.2010 18:40, aquero wrote:
> I want to know
> whether spam-assassin will check the mail content also for finding spam
> score , in its default settings. If not what changes should I make in the
> configurations for, the spam-assassin to include the mail content , for its
> spam check. Pleas
On 4.6.2010 18:53, aquero wrote:
>
> Hi,
> What is the maximum allowed spam score value for a legitimate mail? What
> value should i set as the spam score limit?
The default is 5 and that value works best for any installation, as the
stock rules are configured using that value.
You have it at
Hi,
What is the maximum allowed spam score value for a legitimate mail? What
value should i set as the spam score limit?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/spam-score-limit-adivse-tp28781886p28781886.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi,
I have installed spam assassin in my server and its working perfectly. I
have included the following parameters in the local.cf file
rewrite_header Subject [* SPAM _SCORE_ *]
required_score 2.0
#to be able to use _SCORE_ we need report_safe set to 0
#If this option is se
On Fri 04 Jun 2010 04:44:46 AM CEST, cviebrock wrote
http://pastebin.com/xFddVaX8
http://sanesecurity.org/ dont know what clamav rules helps for this,
but this is another way to stop spam attachements
remember to make good choice of official sigs in clamd if using clamav
milter, only reje
You're right in that it *could* be a common RTF header, but a bit of decoding
of the attachments on my end seems to indicate that it isn't. All these
spam RTFs are practically identical except for a different URL link in the
document, and a different (probably forged) "generator Msftedit #.##.##.
Whoa, thanks I completely missed that. Apparenlty Mandriva 2010 free includes
perl-Mail-SpamAssassin and spamassassin rpms by default even though I am pretty
sure I unselected mail server from the list of install options.
Scot
--- On Fri, 6/4/10, Mark Martinec wrote:
From: Mark Martinec
S
On Friday June 4 2010 07:09:25 Scot Meyer wrote:
> I am unable to get a clean install using the directions in INSTALL from
> working. I have a VM of the Mandriva image prior to installing any
> version of spamassassin. Then I downloaded 3.3.1 and followed the
> directions including running sa-upd
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:44 -0700, cviebrock wrote:
> I'm trying to write a rule to catch a bunch of spam I'm getting recently that
> contain only an .RTF file. The filename, subject line, and other details
> vary, but the raw message body is always the same i.e. the base64 encoded
> RTF file.
>
Am 03.06.2010 16:42, schrieb Kris Deugau:
> Tarvo Kurm wrote:
>> Mails coming in thru postfix+spamass-milter+spamassassin have
>> drastically lower scores than those checked manually with spamassasin
>> or spamc. Specifically, mails taking the milter path will not have
>> RCVD_IN rules matched _alm
18 matches
Mail list logo