On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 13:51 -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> > > body__RCR_MEGADK/.*(M.*E.*G.*A.*D.*K).*/
> >
> > There are a few things that strike me as peculiar about that rule. Not
> > least of which is that it would appear to match the following -
> > hypotheti
Dominic Benson wrote:
On 06/08/10 17:18, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Yeah that is the fastest way. :) I used a little diff formula and
found the issue. My I think this may not be the rule we were going
for but ...
body__RCR_MEGADK/.*(M.*E.*G.*A.*D.*K).*/
There are a
On 06/08/10 17:18, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Yeah that is the fastest way. :) I used a little diff formula and
found the issue. My I think this may not be the rule we were going for
but ...
body__RCR_MEGADK/.*(M.*E.*G.*A.*D.*K).*/
There are a few things that strike
On 8/6/2010 12:18 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Randy Ramsdell :
>>
>>> I found an bug in spamassassin that can be reliably reproduced when
>>> using our local rules. What would be interesting is to track down
>>> where this bug is exactly.
>>>
>>> 1. The process runs
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Randy Ramsdell :
I found an bug in spamassassin that can be reliably reproduced when
using our local rules. What would be interesting is to track down
where this bug is exactly.
1. The process runs @ 100% cpu and hangs there. Has t o be kill -9 'ed
2. I see no erro
* Randy Ramsdell :
> I found an bug in spamassassin that can be reliably reproduced when
> using our local rules. What would be interesting is to track down
> where this bug is exactly.
>
> 1. The process runs @ 100% cpu and hangs there. Has t o be kill -9 'ed
> 2. I see no errors in spamassassin
On 8/6/10 11:43 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I found an bug in spamassassin that can be reliably reproduced when
using our local rules. What would be interesting is to track down
where this bug is exactly.
1. The process runs @ 100% cpu and hangs there. Has t o be kill -9 'ed
2. I see no errors
I found an bug in spamassassin that can be reliably reproduced when
using our local rules. What would be interesting is to track down where
this bug is exactly.
1. The process runs @ 100% cpu and hangs there. Has t o be kill -9 'ed
2. I see no errors in spamassassin -D
For the time being I ha
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 09:48 +0530, Suhag P Desai wrote:
> Simscan is compulsory to use in tcp.smtp ? as I want both attachment
> filtering and content filtering for mails
>
> From: Suhag P Desai [mailto:spde...@gnvfc.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:46 PM
>
> I am running qmailtoaster-p
