Re- hijack - sorry - it was 1:20am when I sent this ... we all make mistakes :)
RE- 'digging' ... I have, but SA seems to have come along a fair bit since
SA2.5 days, hence the word 'easiest'. Maybe 'best' would have been a better
choice of word.
Re- risk. Thing with risk is that 'mileage varie
I have removed spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5 as it is old version. And
installed SpamAssassin Server version 3.3.1. Now my mail scanning is stop
after upgrade the same. I have rebuild the qmail-toaster after doing the
same but still it is not working. Is there any rule that non-toaster package
cannot
> better - *don't even think of using them* - they are not being updated
> and never will.
>
> Anything worthy has already been migrated to SA mainstream and the few
> SARE survivors are also SA commiters so they'll commit to SA instead of
> SARE.
>
> Anybody hammering the rulesemporium with lwp/w
On 8/19/10 7:49 AM, "C. Bensend" wrote:
>
>> better - *don't even think of using them* - they are not being updated
>> and never will.
>>
>> Anything worthy has already been migrated to SA mainstream and the few
>> SARE survivors are also SA commiters so they'll commit to SA instead of
>> SARE.
> Then you haven't been getting the regular updates. If you don't have
> updates.spamassassin.org in your --channelfile, it won't check it...
No, I stand corrected, sorry for the misinformation. At the very
top of the file (they had scrolled out of my term), I have:
updates.spamassassin.org
so
C. Bensend wrote:
Then you haven't been getting the regular updates. If you don't have
updates.spamassassin.org in your --channelfile, it won't check it...
No, I stand corrected, sorry for the misinformation. At the very
top of the file (they had scrolled out of my term), I have:
update
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 09:19 +0100, s...@yacc.co.uk wrote:
> RE- 'digging' ... I have, but SA seems to have come along a fair bit
> since SA2.5 days, hence the word 'easiest'. Maybe 'best' would have
> been a better choice of word.
These sub-BL listings still have been used in 3.1.x, no need to dig
On tor 19 aug 2010 02:21:26 CEST, wrote
A release or two ago, default inclusion of Postmaster and Abuse
lists at RFC-Ignorant.org were turned off (some will say for good
reason).
What is easiest way to turn them back on again?
meta it from subrules, both exists as __foo
here i do
#
# me
On tor 19 aug 2010 10:19:47 CEST, wrote
Re- hijack - sorry - it was 1:20am when I sent this ... we all make
mistakes :)
road to hell is paid with good intentions :)
RE- 'digging' ... I have, but SA seems to have come along a fair bit
since SA2.5 days, hence the word 'easiest'. Maybe 'best
On tor 19 aug 2010 03:14:50 CEST, Marc Perkel wrote
Now you're going to criticize me for explaining what you just asked for?
moderator did not criticize but say imho just this is not your market place
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
10 matches
Mail list logo
