Re: Public Corpus

2010-08-30 Thread Justin Mason
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:03, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:36:36 -0700 (PDT) joker_ft gugafontan...@gmail.com top-posted: Benny Pedersen wrote: On søn 29 aug 2010 17:28:52 CEST, joker_ft wrote Does anyone know some public corpus updates in 2010 ? or why

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread Mark Martinec
On Saturday 28 August 2010 20:00:11 LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote: He was talking about RBL checks when he said that, not the DBL. I think it was just that he used a non-standard format in his reply, which confuses some people Regardless, it is still not working for me. I completely removed and

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread LAWRENCE WILLIAMS
How do I work around this? - Lawrence From: Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 2:21:03 PM Subject: Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL On Saturday 28 August 2010 20:00:11 LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote: He was

some weight for 12-letter 2nd level labels

2010-08-30 Thread Len Conrad
for 1. rejects of high-rate @sender.garbage.domain or rhsbl garbage domains or 2. hold: for high-rate @sender.domain, here is the distribution of qty of letters in the 2nd level label for preceding 10 days: 9 chars: 34 domains 10 : 30 11 : 23 12 : 180 13 : 16 14 : 15 Which corresponds

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 8/30/2010 1:41 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: spamassassin --lint -D output: http://www.lcwsoft.com/salintoutput/salintoutput_debug.txt Option --lint implies --local-only How do I work around this? Do not specify --lint when doing a normal mail check. This option is intended for syntactic

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread LAWRENCE WILLIAMS
I think I was confused for a second. I merely posted the --lint output so that a better eye could see if it showed anything that was obviously wrong. I do not run SA this way normally. Like I said before, I am using a stock SA 3.3.1 with the updates.spamassassin.org channel set to update

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread Mark Martinec
On Monday August 30 2010 21:19:22 LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote: I think I was confused for a second. I merely posted the --lint output so that a better eye could see if it showed anything that was obviously wrong. I do not run SA this way normally. Like I said before, I am using a stock SA 3.3.1

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread LAWRENCE WILLIAMS
Here is a link to the complete output. http://www.lcwsoft.com/salintoutput/salintoutput.txt Any ideas? Regards, Lawrence From: Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 7:21:42 PM Subject: Re: enabling

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread Mark Martinec
Lawrence, Either your DNS resolver is borked, or your firewall/home-router is playing jokes on you. Are you using Google Public DNS for this? Don't! This is a dedicated server in a facility in the US. The server is configured to use the resolvers 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 I wouldn't dream

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread LAWRENCE WILLIAMS
Hi Mark, It is definitely something with those resolvers. When I try the host command you gave me, I get the following error: Host midpage.ru.dbl.spamhaus.org. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) I am contacting the DC now and will hopefully have no further need for assistance on this mailing list :)

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
On man 30 aug 2010 18:55:44 CEST, LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote How do I work around this? spamassassin 21 -D -t msgfile | less -- xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread Mark Martinec
It is definitely something with those resolvers. When I try the host command you gave me, I get the following error: Host midpage.ru.dbl.spamhaus.org. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) I am contacting the DC now and will hopefully have no further need for assistance on this mailing list :) See also:

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Mark Martinec wrote: Lawrence, This is a dedicated server in a facility in the US. The server is configured to use the resolvers 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 I wouldn't dream of relying on Google for anything :) Like I said, your resolver is tricking you. Either by its

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
On tir 31 aug 2010 00:34:33 CEST, LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote Here is a link to the complete output. http://www.lcwsoft.com/salintoutput/salintoutput.txt Aug 30 20:00:47.455 [19467] dbg: async: aborting after 7.423 s, deadline shrunk: URI-DNSBL, DNSBL:multi.uribl.com.:with.com have a

Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL

2010-08-30 Thread LAWRENCE WILLIAMS
Mark's suggestion to switch resolvers seems to have resolved the issue. Thanks to Mark and everyone for his help. Regards, Lawrence From: Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 10:09:53 PM Subject: Re:

Re: some weight for 12-letter 2nd level labels

2010-08-30 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Len Conrad wrote: for 1. rejects of high-rate @sender.garbage.domain or rhsbl garbage domains Can you provide a sample of each pls? Detecting either of those _should_ be trivial, but I'd like to see a sample before suggesting rules. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ