On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:03, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
joker_ft gugafontan...@gmail.com top-posted:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On søn 29 aug 2010 17:28:52 CEST, joker_ft wrote
Does anyone know some public corpus updates in 2010 ? or why
On Saturday 28 August 2010 20:00:11 LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote:
He was talking about RBL checks when he said that, not the DBL. I think it
was just that he used a non-standard format in his reply, which confuses
some people
Regardless, it is still not working for me. I completely removed and
How do I work around this?
- Lawrence
From: Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 2:21:03 PM
Subject: Re: enabling SpamHaus DBL
On Saturday 28 August 2010 20:00:11 LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote:
He was
for
1. rejects of high-rate @sender.garbage.domain or rhsbl garbage domains
or
2. hold: for high-rate @sender.domain,
here is the distribution of qty of letters in the 2nd level label for preceding
10 days:
9 chars: 34 domains
10 : 30
11 : 23
12 : 180
13 : 16
14 : 15
Which corresponds
On 8/30/2010 1:41 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
spamassassin --lint -D output:
http://www.lcwsoft.com/salintoutput/salintoutput_debug.txt
Option --lint implies --local-only
How do I work around this?
Do not specify --lint when doing a normal mail check.
This option is intended for syntactic
I think I was confused for a second. I merely posted the --lint output so that
a
better eye could see if it showed anything that was obviously wrong. I do not
run SA this way normally.
Like I said before, I am using a stock SA 3.3.1 with the
updates.spamassassin.org channel set to update
On Monday August 30 2010 21:19:22 LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote:
I think I was confused for a second. I merely posted the --lint output so
that a better eye could see if it showed anything that was obviously
wrong. I do not run SA this way normally.
Like I said before, I am using a stock SA 3.3.1
Here is a link to the complete output.
http://www.lcwsoft.com/salintoutput/salintoutput.txt
Any ideas?
Regards,
Lawrence
From: Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 7:21:42 PM
Subject: Re: enabling
Lawrence,
Either your DNS resolver is borked, or your firewall/home-router
is playing jokes on you.
Are you using Google Public DNS for this? Don't!
This is a dedicated server in a facility in the US. The server is
configured to use the resolvers 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2
I wouldn't dream
Hi Mark,
It is definitely something with those resolvers. When I try the host command
you
gave me, I get the following error:
Host midpage.ru.dbl.spamhaus.org. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
I am contacting the DC now and will hopefully have no further need for
assistance on this mailing list :)
On man 30 aug 2010 18:55:44 CEST, LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote
How do I work around this?
spamassassin 21 -D -t msgfile | less
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
It is definitely something with those resolvers. When I try the host
command you gave me, I get the following error:
Host midpage.ru.dbl.spamhaus.org. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
I am contacting the DC now and will hopefully have no further need for
assistance on this mailing list :)
See also:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Mark Martinec wrote:
Lawrence,
This is a dedicated server in a facility in the US. The server is
configured to use the resolvers 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2
I wouldn't dream of relying on Google for anything :)
Like I said, your resolver is tricking you. Either by its
On tir 31 aug 2010 00:34:33 CEST, LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote
Here is a link to the complete output.
http://www.lcwsoft.com/salintoutput/salintoutput.txt
Aug 30 20:00:47.455 [19467] dbg: async: aborting after 7.423 s,
deadline shrunk: URI-DNSBL, DNSBL:multi.uribl.com.:with.com
have a
Mark's suggestion to switch resolvers seems to have resolved the issue. Thanks
to Mark and everyone for his help.
Regards,
Lawrence
From: Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 10:09:53 PM
Subject: Re:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Len Conrad wrote:
for
1. rejects of high-rate @sender.garbage.domain or rhsbl garbage domains
Can you provide a sample of each pls?
Detecting either of those _should_ be trivial, but I'd like to see a
sample before suggesting rules.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
16 matches
Mail list logo