On 2010-11-16 23:52, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:20 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:02 +, Mike Bro wrote:
2. Email body contains less than 4 characters
I've never seen mail with so short a body - where's
Hi all!
I've created custom rbl with own dns. I've noticed problem when
connection from remote smtp is via ipv6. It looks like SA dosen't query
rbl about address ipv6.
Example 1:
client(address BB, ipv4)-MTA( CC, ipv4)-dest. MTA
in this case, SA checks for both addresses BB and CC
example 2:
I'm going to use own rbl to do it.
Hi,
I've got a strange problem: some messages that have a negative score are
getting flagged as spam.
Example from log:
Message oASERJxQ023391 from x.y.z.a {svr.hotmail.com}
(froma...@hotmail.com) to tgtdomain.nl is spam, SORBS-DNSBL,
SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.379, required 5, BAYES_00
On man 22 nov 2010 14:05:46 CET, Ger Apeldoorn wrote
Is this a known bug and if so, is there a workaround available?
disable rbl tests in mailscanner
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Marcin Mirosław mar...@mejor.pl writes:
I'm using SA-3.3.1, NetAddr-IP-4.033.
May you give any advice?
Sorry, i don't know about 3.3.1 Version. By the way there is somewhat
similar patchs for IPv6. You would check out as following:
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/
Sincerely,
disable rbl tests in mailscanner
Wouldn't that pass through much more spam? Is this a known bug?
Do you perhaps have a link to more information? Google didn't turn up
anything relevant.
Thank you very much,
Ger.
PS: I'm mailing this from another address to prevent the mail-banner
to be
