> disable rbl tests in mailscanner
Wouldn't that pass through much more spam? Is this a known bug?
Do you perhaps have a link to more information? Google didn't turn up
anything relevant.
Thank you very much,
Ger.
PS: I'm mailing this from another address to prevent the mail-banner
to be append
Marcin Mirosław writes:
> I'm using SA-3.3.1, NetAddr-IP-4.033.
> May you give any advice?
Sorry, i don't know about 3.3.1 Version. By the way there is somewhat
similar patchs for IPv6. You would check out as following:
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/
Sincerely,
--
소여물 황병희(
On man 22 nov 2010 14:05:46 CET, Ger Apeldoorn wrote
Is this a known bug and if so, is there a workaround available?
disable rbl tests in mailscanner
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Hi,
I've got a strange problem: some messages that have a negative score are
getting flagged as spam.
Example from log:
Message oASERJxQ023391 from x.y.z.a {svr.hotmail.com}
(froma...@hotmail.com) to tgtdomain.nl is spam, SORBS-DNSBL,
SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.379, required 5, BAYES_00
I'm going to use own rbl to do it.
Hi all!
I've created custom rbl with own dns. I've noticed problem when
connection from remote smtp is via ipv6. It looks like SA dosen't query
rbl about address ipv6.
Example 1:
client(address BB, ipv4)->MTA( CC, ipv4)->dest. MTA
in this case, SA checks for both addresses BB and CC
example 2:
cl
On 2010-11-16 23:52, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:20 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:02 +, Mike Bro wrote:
>>>
2. Email body contains less than 4 characters
>>>
>>> I've never seen mail with so sh