Re: Problems with DATE_IN_FUTURE_

2010-11-30 Thread RW
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:41:24 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote: > On tir 30 nov 2010 00:25:18 CET, RW wrote > > > I don't know if it's significant, but all four quoted emails have > > one thing in common - they lack any usable received header before > > the one > > in that case mue did not add requere

RE: sender in black list

2010-11-30 Thread Salvatore
Benny Pedersen wrote: > blacklist_from not blacklist from Is strange but also with: blacklist_from t...@hotmail.it mail with this sender are in queue: 5E9691DAD40 387469 Mon Nov 29 18:13:44 t...@hotmail.it (conversation with mail.domain.ru[85.21.x.y] timed out while sending RCPT TO)

Illegal mix of collations for operation

2010-11-30 Thread David Sanchez Herrero
Hi all, I'm having a rare problem with MySQL Cluster 7.1.5. I have a mail platform combining Postfix+Amavisd-new+Spamassassin (3.3.1)+ClamAV+Mysql-Cluster over a OpenSUSE GNU/Linux 11.2. The cluster stores the user data to access the mail throw Webmail, and the bayes database. When everything

Re: Problems with DATE_IN_FUTURE_

2010-11-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michael Menge < > michael.me...@zdv.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote: > > we recieve some e-Mails triggering the DATE_IN_FUTURE rules > > where i don't understand why the date is in future. On 29.11.10 13:23, David Burns wrote: > I've also seen some that I also don't unde

Re: Problems with DATE_IN_FUTURE_

2010-11-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
On tir 30 nov 2010 00:25:18 CET, RW wrote I don't know if it's significant, but all four quoted emails have one thing in common - they lack any usable received header before the one in that case mue did not add requered Date: header -- xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Re: Problems with DATE_IN_FUTURE_

2010-11-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
On man 29 nov 2010 22:23:57 CET, David Burns wrote I've been setting the scores for those to 0 for a long time, but your post makes me hope that maybe there's a better way? there was 2 servers, one with 3.3.1 and a older with 3.2.3, only the first is fixed with that date problem, if you can p

Re: help: bayes failed: RESOLVED

2010-11-30 Thread Tom Kinghorn
Further to my post, when using amavis, the autolearn fails, when i pass the same mail via spamassassin -t -D < message, it shows autolearn=spam, so it looks like an amavis issue. I know its now OT, but any advice would be appreciated. Thanks Tom Hi List Please ignore. Problem solved.

Re: help: bayes failed: update

2010-11-30 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 2010/11/30 10:07 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote: Good morning List. Apologies for this post but I do not know what else to try. I am new to Suse & Amavisd-new. (inherited system) As such, I appear to have a problem getting bayes to learn. Hi List. Further to my post, when using amavis, the auto

Re: Not passing checks (tests=[none])

2010-11-30 Thread Angel L. Mateo
El 29/11/10 13:07, Mark Martinec escribió: Angel, I have run it with amavis user. I attach you the output of the command. There you can see some checks (dns checks), but it seems that none of them is passed. I only one serious issue that I can see: Assuming the xenon12.um.es is your MX, it n

help: bayes failed

2010-11-30 Thread Tom Kinghorn
Good morning List. Apologies for this post but I do not know what else to try. I am new to Suse & Amavisd-new. (inherited system) As such, I appear to have a problem getting bayes to learn. I keep getting the errors autolearn=failed I have a feeling its a permission problem due to amavis but