Re: whitelist_return_path

On man 20 dec 2010 05:31:40 CET, wrote Gentlemen, I wish there was a whitelist_from *...@facebookmail.com rule that would use the Return-Path field, $ egrep '^(From|Return-Path):' a b a:Return-Path: notification+zj4oo-6-6...@facebookmail.com a:From: Facebook

Re: preventing authenticated smtp users from triggering PBL

Hi Aaron, I know in our setup we just give trusted_networks a score of -120, that way it usually doesn't matter if they kick off any PBL's etc on their initial hop. Regards Eddie Hallahan Enterprise Management Consulting www.emcuk.com Enterprise Management Consulting is a company registered in

Re: Fake MX

Hello Toni Mueller, Am 2010-12-08 19:06:43, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: I tried the high MX for some time, but in my experience, spammers usually only hit the first two MXes. I do not have this experience. So if you were using the high and low MX, you should imho have no reasonable

Re: whitelist_return_path

On 12/19/2010 11:31 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: Gentlemen, I wish there was a whitelist_from *...@facebookmail.com rule that would use the Return-Path field, $ egrep '^(From|Return-Path):' a b a:Return-Path: notification+zj4oo-6-6...@facebookmail.com a:From: Facebook

DKIM verification failed vs DKIM couldn't verify ?

I think I must have asked this before, so I must have forgotten the answer - is there any way of distinguising between DKIM verification negative and DKIM could not verify? /Per Jessen, Zürich