On søn 26 dec 2010 04:09:00 CET, "Warren Togami Jr." wrote
For now I'm proposing only disabling NJABL in sa-update, since it is
currently useless and not worth the extra network query.
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DNSBL%20Usage
for me it seems moved there ?
zen 127.0.0.5
Hey folks,
Does anyone know the story of what is going on with NJABL?
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20101225-r1052760-n/RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY/detail
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20101225-r1052760-n/RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY/detail
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20101225-r1052760-n/RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM
In general, please stop worrying about your corpus being ideal. Our sample
size right now is so small that even non-ideal corpora would be helpful.
Get started with cron nightly masschecks then work on improving your corpus
later.
I personally include:
* The last 4 weeks of spam. I use logrotate
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:57:43 +0100
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 2010-12-24 12:37, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> > You have the option of uploading your corpus to the central server
> > to process every night. But most people have privacy concerns
> > about that if it is their own personal ham. Fo
On 12/25, John Hardin wrote:
> Sorry, I realize now that was unclear. What does "current" in
> "current emails" mean? What time window? Since the last masscheck? A
> week? Six months?
Since the last mass check of that type (network / nightly), yes.
> And how do you ensure a sufficiently large
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Also "current" is referring to the nightly masscheck snapshot of svn trunk
including the latest rules.
Sorry, I realize now that was unclear. What does "current" in "current
emails" mean? What time window? Since the last masscheck? A week? Six
mo
At 09:07 AM 12.24.2010 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Top post:
Guess I'm the only one with this issue or was it an ignorant question?
Jack
>Using:
>FBSD-7.x
>p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1_3
>perl-5.8.9_3
>mysql-server-5.0.90
>
>I'm getting a lot of these error messages from the perl module Bayes.pm.
I thought a bit more about the --reuse problem. While there are pros and
cons to reuse, I guess there is more benefit to --reuse than without. So I
now recommend it in all cases of masscheck.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> This does remind me however that there is a
